35 responses from Ms Diane Meakin (Individual)
1. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 10:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Paragraph No.
0.0 Whole Document
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Please find enclosed maps with annotations which act as general summaries of present remarks regarding this present consultation on Land Allocation, together with this covering letter and a list of those maps the whole together to be MY RESPONSE.
During the last twelve years or even more I have put forward various letter summary papers that refer to land under South Lakeland District Council including that which concluded with the Inquiry of March 2012 into S.L.D.C. Core 2025 Plans. I particularly note this as it was cleared with the assumption that the Council would have the same amount of land at its allocation as from prior than. But since that date both the Lake District National Park and the Yorkshire Dales National Park have made representations to claim parts of this land for their own. Altogether as much as one third of land as at Two Thousand and Ten would be lost to SLDC which makes me wonder the legality of Core 2025 especially as YDNP Planning comes under the North East Regional Board as Sedbergh does now.
(See also attached maps)
2. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 12:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN133M KENDAL WEST OF OXENHOLME ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
EMPLOYMENT COMBINED:
Nearby estates
"Get up"
"Put to bed"
"Have a bath"
Part time or Full time
Joint jobs = club of offices, teachers, maintenance ..../ vehicles.
Even considered ..... [text omitted - unable to decipher] Outer. Running / walking wheelchair track 9ft width to allow. Small quiet building for service. Seen houses shelters dotted about. My Idea Put ... [text omitted] consultation. The whole of this LAND to be especially catered for over 55's (legal definition - age= could be used PLANNING). While too late for the area known now as The Oaks. I suggested a legal [clause?] as leasees of the land - itself in Trusteeship to preserve major parts as open Parkland. At parts "Hamlets" in different styles according to position. Hamlets = not as told in school as 5 to 6 houses. But small developments which allow for 'pre adjustment for older people - one floor apartments for two comfortably. The buildings below line of road = view preserved and local stone used.
CEGAC club = shares of = small house £. Rules = Kendalians born, leved 20 years +; NOT bought out by 'just returned'. Frees larger houses for families in area. On bus / train routes; local / long distant. Club house capable of meeting / livingroom; Classrooms / hobbies i.e. pottery class. Base level swimming pool; Indoors - outdoors. Close by hospital for general consultation / emergencies. A Clubhouse; cafe for residents with guests allowed; full professional kitchen (work); supplying same and delivery on order to dwellings; anchor point for handle bars.
(see attached document)
3. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 12:34:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.7 Business and Science Park Sites - M2M-mod KENDAL LAND EAST OF BURTON ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
1. M2M - completely against; fight and fight again .... Combined employment; Parkland; apartments / hamlets, no roads, exceeds access, quiet building, club house, cafe, classrooms, exercise swimming (Sandgates suggestion type - over subscribed)
2. Completely against this - see Kendal South East Maps; fought in inquiries several times; why restate?
3. I have been in various inquiries over the years where this land has been put forward for use. Each time the Inspector has agreed with our points. One of the greatest views out over the fields to the castle of The Parr family (6th wife of Henry VIII) surrounding it the 'Old Grey Town' of Kendal. Why keep putting it back into such plans except pounds?
4. EMPLOYMENT COMBINED:
Nearby estates
"Get up"
"Put to bed"
"Have a bath"
Part time or Full time
Joint jobs = club of offices, teachers, maintenance ..../ vehicles.
Even considered ..... [text omitted - unable to decipher] Outer. Running / walking wheelchair track 9ft width to allow. Small quiet building for service. Seen houses shelters dotted about. My Idea Put ... [text omitted] consultation. The whole of this LAND to be especially catered for over 55's (legal definition - age= could be used PLANNING). While too late for the area known now as The Oaks. I suggested a legal [clause?] as leasees of the land - itself in Trusteeship to preserve major parts as open Parkland. At parts "Hamlets" in different styles according to position. Hamlets = not as told in school as 5 to 6 houses. But small developments which allow for 'pre adjustment for older people - one floor apartments for two comfortably. The buildings below line of road = view preserved and local stone used.
CEGAC club = shares of = small house £. Rules = Kendalians born, leved 20 years +; NOT bought out by 'just returned'. Frees larger houses for families in area. On bus / train routes; local / long distant. Club house capable of meeting / livingroom; Classrooms / hobbies i.e. pottery class. Base level swimming pool; Indoors - outdoors. Close by hospital for general consultation / emergencies. A Clubhouse; cafe for residents with guests allowed; full professional kitchen (work); supplying same and delivery on order to dwellings; anchor point for handle bars.
4. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 14:00:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.9 Green Gaps between - KENDAL and OXENHOLME
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
EMPLOYMENT COMBINED:
Nearby estates
"Get up"
"Put to bed"
"Have a bath"
Part time or Full time
Joint jobs = club of offices, teachers, maintenance ..../ vehicles.
Even considered ..... [text omitted - unable to decipher] Outer. Running / walking wheelchair track 9ft width to allow. Small quiet building for service. Seen houses shelters dotted about. My Idea Put ... [text omitted] consultation. The whole of this LAND to be especially catered for over 55's (legal definition - age= could be used PLANNING). While too late for the area known now as The Oaks. I suggested a legal [clause?] as leasees of the land - itself in Trusteeship to preserve major parts as open Parkland. At parts "Hamlets" in different styles according to position. Hamlets = not as told in school as 5 to 6 houses. But small developments which allow for 'pre adjustment for older people - one floor apartments for two comfortably. The buildings below line of road = view preserved and local stone used.
CEGAC club = shares of = small house £. Rules = Kendalians born, leved 20 years +; NOT bought out by 'just returned'. Frees larger houses for families in area. On bus / train routes; local / long distant. Club house capable of meeting / livingroom; Classrooms / hobbies i.e. pottery class. Base level swimming pool; Indoors - outdoors. Close by hospital for general consultation / emergencies. A Clubhouse; cafe for residents with guests allowed; full professional kitchen (work); supplying same and delivery on order to dwellings; anchor point for handle bars.
(see attached document)
5. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 14:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.4 Broad Locations for New Housing - BURTON ROAD, KENDAL
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Breaks natural boundaries of town; followed by this SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT - NO, NO, NO.
(see attached documentation)
6. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 14:22:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R97 /MN34# KENDAL SOUTH OF NATLAND BECK FARM
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Breaks natural boundaries of town; followed by this SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT - NO, NO, NO.
Both R97M-mod and MN34# are the SAME PRINCIPLES AS M2M-mod. Prominent positions - green field sites.
Not particularly appealing site of Kendal Canal ... works .... for [text omission - unable to decipher]
7. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 14:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - E31M KENDAL LAND SOUTH OF K SHOES, NATLAND ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
This was partially suggest for the restoration of Kendal's Canal of which South Lakeland has already paid consultants for feasability studies; Kendal Canal under reopening consideration ..
(see attached document)
Not particularly appealing site of Kendal Canal ... works .... for [text omission - unable to decipher]
ROMAN FORT: Not been completely discovered nor touched in many years. Could be bigger than thought as Watergate ub [text omission - unable to decipher] Defence York Ingleborough ... See vessels = long as well as short route = forts west coast.
8. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 14:33:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R107M mod and R150M KENDAL KENDAL PARKS
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Not up to railway. ... with all year shrub Tree Screen and Stone Boundaries for houses. Public path joined along with other accesses. Present and in the future.
Consideration to access via farm .. access under railway to Paltis / Road. High Park and via Kendal Park Farm. (Presently barred / wired) As well as various connections to access off Kendal Parks Estate and Cheviot Road (Barretts) such as able to join PS6.
Even starred - must include Park ... strip with all year screening planted NO back gardens visible.
Main visitor approach Lake District, Windermere Railway = disinterested visitors; no visitors; no business; no £'s made; no upkeep.
9. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 15:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Kendal sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
In the Inquiry of March 2010 this Action Plan was mentioned and various other matters arising. Particularly regard a third supermarket that could be classed as 'Town Centre'.
There was reference to the Jubilee Fields (Kendal North East) and fields below West Coast Main Railway Line at Oxenholme off Oxenholme Road. The fact of these large areas of Town removed from Plan Core 2025 and this Land Allocation has sometimes proved difficult to make complete judgements.
Jubilee Fields here guarded - good. But possible some development associated with ex Milk Marketing Board Road (opposite Morrisons / Queen Katherine) could be considered adjacent? By roadside (west) on way to this (new) Business Park - i.e. small units = as Beezon Road ex railway but [text omitted - unable to decipher]
Kendal Old Quarry = 'Penningtons'. Stopped due to water discovered. Limestone filtered = pre historic possibilities? Any heavy machinery / Industrial usage should be properly assessed / sealed surface to reduce contamination.
Still do not like 'blank' of this action plan which has had a variety of suggestions not all good AND includes housing which being separate PLAN does not seem to count towards number called for through The North West Planning Regional Authority which is disconcerting at the least.
On upper northern part of this sheet (see attached plan) I mentioned how the sweep of the bypass but also visible from the Brigsteer Road would be able to view this overrun of new building.
Ironically as Bradley Fields where the old Kendal Horse Racing is still noted is a SSSI - Site of Special Scientific Interest. How long will it remain so when there are bridges to convey dog walkers to and into it. Just a nice 'swing' of a route for a walk. Aside from spoiling the greenfields approach to the Lake District.
Some suggestions - possible walk linkage to northern end of Parkway off PS61.
Query (map ref Kendal South East) - This is water what is the sense of the gas mains near railway?
10. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 15:24:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R121M-mod KENDAL EAST OF CASTLE GREEN ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Use of this brings buildings closer to the railway. I remarked on this type of closeness in the past. Over the years I have seen the disinterest of train passengers to look out of the window even when the Lake District Hills (National Park) are visible.
I fear that this act of dischantment could tell against future business.
11. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 16:05:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN169M+ RN299# KENDAL WEST OF HIGH SPARROWMIRE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Termage:
'Blood Kendalians' - those people with a very strong connection to the area i.e. born and possible parents also born Kendal (or very near - 5 miles)
This [site] completely breaks the boundaries of Kendal. Completely green fields NEVER BEEN BUILT UPON. Any claims as 'gaps' not what one could call same. This is rising land - top of road is high but houses not easily seen due to screening of gardens. Stone - variable walling too.
At past consultations RN169M & RN299# suggested IF passed for building give special protection. To be built part sunden in GROUND as additional and local co-operative of 'Blood Kendalians'. As all aboe red signed land should be starred for special consideration. Design materials; screening.
12. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 2 May 2012 16:12:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.4 Broad Locations for New Housing - APPLEBY ROAD, KENDAL
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Low 1 - so named as near watercourse that could be overwhelmed by a new drainage system on this low lying site.
Site 2 - Even bigger possibly.
Both sites bring transport problems to mind. Road narrows and not made for any type of heavy or high volume traffic.
Inquiry, Core 2010 suggested problems; capacity water = Wattsfield Sewage Workd.
Delay on Planning several years.
Size is not given but if one fills in field boundaries in which these are set area is much larger.
My understanding is these red dashed circles denote additional areas under consideration for more buildings. Both are huge areas OUTSIDE present boundaries that are built.
13. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:14:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - E23K# KENDAL LAND NORTH OF MEADOWBANK BUSINESS PARK
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
This continues the outside boundaries. Problems mentioned below.
Traffic [word omitted] alos apply BUT prefer usage of site to others suggested. Continuation of past extension for employment. Inquiry Core 2010 suggested problems. Capacity waste = Wattsfield Sewage Works. Delay on Planning several years.
14. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:20:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - E33 KENDAL LAND AT BOUNDARY BANK
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I think this is suggested. New Council Waste site if Canal Head north closed. Water is underneath and should be guarded in sealed surfaces.
15. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:29:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R129M KENDAL SOUTH OF UNDERBARROW ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
This too via lovely old peice of ground with vegetation undistrubed. Surprised - considered due to contours suitable for building upon. Lock out use of heavy machinery DESIGN / TO SITE / Unique development. This is such a disappointment to use these beautiful green fields; not green gaps visible on top of hill coming along on bypass. Hope you can save green lane; very old way; special treatment.
16. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:35:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R31# KENDAL LAND AT VICARAGE DRIVE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Could be an interesting block of apartments not to be wasted on a few houses. 'Sheltered' by high ground rise = possible security of ground stability. Buildings along railway - see my notes on disenchant visitors to lake District; same applies here.
17. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M41KM KENDAL SOUTH OF LUMLEY ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
M41KM AGAIN outside the existing town boundaries on green field site. Pleasant approach to Kendal Town with stone used and mature vegetation. Surprised. In future = leads to = red dashed circle (see attached plan)
18. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:56:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.6 Strategic Employment Sites - E4M KENDAL LAND AT SCROGGS WOOD, MILNTHORPE ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Time and time again; passed accepted boundary of Scroggs Wood green site; partly in possible flood plain.
These green fields on the right into Kendal look across green fields. Once called Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty towards the unspoilt land south of Kendal upwards to the eastern hills that being the town.
19. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 09:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - Site Omission
If you have selected a ‘Site omission’ please enter the site reference or location and relevant policy below
Site omission ON56#
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
[Please refer to attached document]
LAND ALLOCATION PLANS CONSULTATION April 2012
This shows employment; industrial - craft outlet, visitor centre. Additional usage of sponsered CCC bus route used by local people. Able to divert before entering village. Main entrance. Easy access to A roads and motorway / bypass.
Re Water Canal - without waiting for reconnection to Lancaster at Tewitfield due to 'CUT OFF' M6 motoway 1962.
As Inquiry evidence, Canal Trust; This section (as shown on map) to be part of Section 3 redevelopment plan to re-water whole length - join onto canal into Lancaster and thence all English / Welsh system navigation as is.
My suggestion - Why wait? from as shown re water whole or from Sedgwick. On present bus route - day tickets available. Could extend to South Kendal - re-water - to Watercrook.
Local housing a solution. Separation from existing housing and yet naturally screened by raising ground.
IDEA - As suggested Core Plan 2025 SLDC and Inquiry 2010; develop fields in a natural screened hollow.
Excavate 5 ft only required (waste riddled stone used)
Two harbour pools on either side of bridge; new returned track access; access only (foot traffic).
East 'Houseboats' local people = local stock building; West - 'visitors' own or hired (i.e. Norfolk Broads); craft 'village' suppliers (workshops / shops / display) chandlers; None vehicle one in park (stone wall screened).
20. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 10:39:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN223 OXENHOLME LAND E OF BURTON RD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
This infills a lovely little paddock field; will it lead to more infill up hill joining on between / level Beaswood (Oxenholme)
Later suggested extension - condition of some denied. Sorry if built; would prefer not.
21. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 10:49:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R108M OXENHOLME LAND S OF FELL CLOSE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Again field boundary broken - not green gap. Once before put forward to use whole site to Helm Lane - ... wedge to develop whole.
No; not only for key suggested idea.
Completely against R108M.
Parkside and Natland Churches filling; natural burial ground (ashes) & memorial usage of stat reg; nearest to houses [text omission]; "Woodland Walk" - basically Hawthorn trees (reduced sizes) near road; some old natural holly; paths zig-zag = levelled for wheelchair usage; low kerbs = for brass plate memorials. Possible 'Family Section' - as Family grave sites.
22. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 11:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R62 NATLAND WEST OF SEDGWICK RD, NATLAND
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Disappointed - this field has been retained. Hope some consideration is given to surrounding houses and styles. H = was Holmes (see attached document), a local nursery, good quality plants raised on own premises. Now sold and built upon by not very welcoming design; last seen compared with spacing and looks of carefully crafted buildings on north, east and south of same. Hope more care given to any allowed on this site.
23. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 11:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - Site Omission
If you have selected a ‘Site omission’ please enter the site reference or location and relevant policy below
Site omission - R120#
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
EMPLOYMENT COMBINED:
Nearby estates
"Get up"
"Put to bed"
"Have a bath"
Part time or Full time
Joint jobs = club of offices, teachers, maintenance ..../ vehicles.
Even considered ..... [text omitted - unable to decipher] Outer. Running / walking wheelchair track 9ft width to allow. Small quiet building for service. Seen houses shelters dotted about. My Idea Put ... [text omitted] consultation. The whole of this LAND to be especially catered for over 55's (legal definition - age= could be used PLANNING). While too late for the area known now as The Oaks. I suggested a legal [clause?] as leasees of the land - itself in Trusteeship to preserve major parts as open Parkland. At parts "Hamlets" in different styles according to position. Hamlets = not as told in school as 5 to 6 houses. But small developments which allow for 'pre adjustment for older people - one floor apartments for two comfortably. The buildings below line of road = view preserved and local stone used.
CEGAC club = shares of = small house £. Rules = Kendalians born, leved 20 years +; NOT bought out by 'just returned'. Frees larger houses for families in area. On bus / train routes; local / long distant. Club house capable of meeting / livingroom; Classrooms / hobbies i.e. pottery class. Base level swimming pool; Indoors - outdoors. Close by hospital for general consultation / emergencies. A Clubhouse; cafe for residents with guests allowed; full professional kitchen (work); supplying same and delivery on order to dwellings; anchor point for handle bars.
Natland - Map 19:
The suggestion on this map has been put forward by both word and in the written. I was disappointed not to see it NOT given the consideration I feel it deserves due to its nature and circumstances of the future. It is, I believe, ideally situated as it is close to Kendal and can be driven, walked , bus or riden to with ease.
It is a quiet locality inspite of this close proximity to the town and easily arrived at from reasons of localities.
Bus x35 to Westmorland General Hospital from Kendal Grange areas = 1 mile. A65 to site [text omitted - unable to decipher]. 555 bus change bus station / Milnthorpe road stops. Also bus 41 town becomes 44 Hallgarth or change Town Hall / Stricklandgate; 567 Kendal to Sedbergh onto Kirkby Stephen - many return to Kendal from same town into Helmside. Bus stops both ways less than 1/2 mile; easy walk Helmside; garage, petrol and shop (see attached document)
24. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 11:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Oxenholme sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Natland - Map 19:
The suggestion on this map has been put forward by both word and in the written. I was disappointed not to see it NOT given the consideration I feel it deserves due to its nature and circumstances of the future. It is, I believe, ideally situated as it is close to Kendal and can be driven, walked , bus or riden to with ease.
It is a quiet locality inspite of this close proximity to the town and easily arrived at from reasons of localities.
Bus x35 to Westmorland General Hospital from Kendal Grange areas = 1 mile. A65 to site [text omitted - unable to decipher]. 555 bus change bus station / Milnthorpe road stops. Also bus 41 town becomes 44 Hallgarth or change Town Hall / Stricklandgate; 567 Kendal to Sedbergh onto Kirkby Stephen - many return to Kendal from same town into Helmside. Bus stops both ways less than 1/2 mile; easy walk Helmside; garage, petrol and shop (see attached document)
Parkside and Natland Churches filling; natural burial ground (ashes) & memorial usage of stat reg; nearest to houses [text omission]; "Woodland Walk" - basically Hawthorn trees (reduced sizes) near road; some old natural holly; paths zig-zag = levelled for wheelchair usage; low kerbs = for brass plate memorials. Possible 'Family Section' - as Family grave sites.
[Text below to be read in conjunction with attached document / plan]
Closed off northern end (Kendal side) former A6 s route cut off.
OD = old road; new drive approach to houses alongside;
G = Field gate off A65; adaptable for easy entrance;
T = trees act as screen on higher ground - natural screen from A65; A65 wide verge; grass flat - possible easy extra space tarred for parking; across road existing layby but never used for walkers up Helm Lane onto The Helme (hill)
E = suggested site of eco friendly toilets; 'natural' with shelter / view / benches = in memorium (?)
No dogs allowed; special tie rail to side. Railway natural filter / barrier down hill view across valley to Scout Scar [some text omitted - unable to decipher]
25. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - Site Omission
If you have selected a ‘Site omission’ please enter the site reference or location and relevant policy below
Land south of R108M
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Natland - Map 19:
Bus x35 to Westmorland General Hospital from Kendal Grange areas = 1 mile. A65 to site [text omitted - unable to decipher]. 555 bus change bus station / Milnthorpe road stops. Also bus 41 town becomes 44 Hallgarth or change Town Hall / Stricklandgate; 567 Kendal to Sedbergh onto Kirkby Stephen - many return to Kendal from same town into Helmside. Bus stops both ways less than 1/2 mile; easy walk Helmside; garage, petrol and shop (see attached document)
Parkside and Natland Churches filling; natural burial ground (ashes) & memorial usage of stat reg; nearest to houses [text omission]; "Woodland Walk" - basically Hawthorn trees (reduced sizes) near road; some old natural holly; paths zig-zag = levelled for wheelchair usage; low kerbs = for brass plate memorials. Possible 'Family Section' - as Family grave sites.
[Text below to be read in conjunction with attached document / plan]
Closed off northern end (Kendal side) former A6 s route cut off.
OD = old road; new drive approach to houses alongside;
G = Field gate off A65; adaptable for easy entrance;
T = trees act as screen on higher ground - natural screen from A65; A65 wide verge; grass flat - possible easy extra space tarred for parking; across road existing layby but never used for walkers up Helm Lane onto The Helme (hill)
E = suggested site of eco friendly toilets; 'natural' with shelter / view / benches = in memorium (?)
No dogs allowed; special tie rail to side. Railway natural filter / barrier down hill view across valley to Scout Scar [some text omitted - unable to decipher]
26. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:18:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M38M BURNESIDE LAND OPPOSITE HOLME HOUSES
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I will just mention this patch of ground M38M. Is just as you are pulling out of Burneside on the train heading to Windermere with the Lake District National Park boundary VERY CLOSE. Apart from this my comments about infill up to the railway line and the disenchantment of our many guests.
I would request:
1. Development is starred for special design requirements (Development Brief for site) AND includes natural stone in both housing and boundary (walls). Together with all year screen - natural planting i.e. holly - can be cut to 10ft high to stop 'urbanization' look - back gardens - seen from train.
27. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:31:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Burneside sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Although I no longer live near Burneside, I am heart [word omitted] of it at times like these. While I am sure others will produce their comments, I will restrict mine to those below while reserving rights to speak, write or otherwise communicate at times as [word omitted] - i.e. in any Inquiry.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
YES, I wish to participate at the oral examination
28. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:37:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R489M BURNESIDE LAND ADJ HALL PARK
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Sorry these fields will be built upon while leaving main comments to those most closely concerned. Hope rememberance is given to fact that a lot of stone is in Burneside used in both houses, other buildings and boundary walls. Perhaps particular attention could be paid to this matter over and above normal planning brief and no modern white rendered outsides that are not appropriate to situation.
29. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:40:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - E32M BURNESIDE LAND ADJ CROPPERS PAPER MILL
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Presume allowance for expansion of mill - no objection; otherwise weary about traffic routes in particular - reserve comments.
30. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:43:00
Policy/Site No.
LA2.13 OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES, SOUTH OF BURNESIDE FOOTBALL CLUB, BURNESIDE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Not sure what this is supposed to show. Hope not further urbanisation of site with buildings i.e. houses or industrial units. Unless part of flood prevention or similar. Even so would like design brief * star.
31. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.10 Existing Green Infrastructure
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
AS100 protection OK [text omitted - unable to decipher] park alongside railway line.
[refer to attached document]
32. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 12:53:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN57M MILNTHORPE ADJ. TO ST ANTHONY'S CLOSE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Think ... [word omission] close to folly; top of hill; too much in view possibly - see from Kent Estuary instead of fold of hills which shields most of village.
33. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 13:10:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - M9M1-mod MILNTHORPE LAND ADJACENT TO BRIDGE END BUSINESS PARK, PARK ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Access route difficult? Access route concerns
34. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 13:12:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R151M-mod MILNTHORPE SOUTH OF MILNTHORPE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Again out of village boundary. Will it be considered?
35. Ms Diane Meakin (Individual) : 4 May 2012 13:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Policy/Site No.
LA1.4 Broad Locations for New Housing - LAND ADJACENT TO FIRS ROAD, MILNTHORPE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
[See attached plan - to be read in conjunction with text below:
? Query - are these lands also included inthis marked as possible expansion.
Join up cross hatch marked land around red dashed circle marked for possible expansion. Some screening, natural stone boundary, mature gree retained - needs included if developed.
