3 responses from Mr Roger Cartwright (Individual)
1. Mr Roger Cartwright (Individual) : 10 Jul 2017 14:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please use the drop down menu to indicate which of the following sites you are commenting on. Please use a separate form for each site.
Silverdale - part of S50
Please use the box below to make your comments.
I was disappointed to receive this additional consultation that appears to go back on or undermine some of the emerging policies in the Development Plan. Such as:
Policy
Q6 – Agreed that affordable housing should be a priority for any new development. We think the proportion should be more like 60%. The AONB is special and therefore it merits special guidelines for development.
Q7 – Yes, new housing should be for local people to meet identified needs and should be for use as main residence. Much of it should be for rent. Where affordable property is owned, we believe that, on re-sale, for a stated period local people should have the first option to buy.
Q8 – Only applications which propose housing that meets real ecological sustainability targets (eg. high energy efficiency) and caters for identified needs (eg for small/affordable/disability-friendly housing), should be considered for consent. We cannot offer advice on how this approach could be promoted.
My brief, mainly landscape comments on the further additional sites are attached.
[SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT]
2. Mr Roger Cartwright (Individual) : 10 Jul 2017 14:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please use the drop down menu to indicate which of the following sites you are commenting on. Please use a separate form for each site.
Storth - Quarry Lane
Please use the box below to make your comments.
I was disappointed to receive this additional consultation that appears to go back on or undermine some of the emerging policies in the Development Plan. Such as:
Policy
Q6 – Agreed that affordable housing should be a priority for any new development. We think the proportion should be more like 60%. The AONB is special and therefore it merits special guidelines for development.
Q7 – Yes, new housing should be for local people to meet identified needs and should be for use as main residence. Much of it should be for rent. Where affordable property is owned, we believe that, on re-sale, for a stated period local people should have the first option to buy.
Q8 – Only applications which propose housing that meets real ecological sustainability targets (eg. high energy efficiency) and caters for identified needs (eg for small/affordable/disability-friendly housing), should be considered for consent. We cannot offer advice on how this approach could be promoted.
My brief, mainly landscape comments on the further additional sites are attached.
[SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT]
3. Mr Roger Cartwright (Individual) : 10 Jul 2017 14:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please use the drop down menu to indicate which of the following sites you are commenting on. Please use a separate form for each site.
Arnside - Hollins Lane A8/A9
Please use the box below to make your comments.
I was disappointed to receive this additional consultation that appears to go back on or undermine some of the emerging policies in the Development Plan. Such as:
Policy
Q6 – Agreed that affordable housing should be a priority for any new development. We think the proportion should be more like 60%. The AONB is special and therefore it merits special guidelines for development.
Q7 – Yes, new housing should be for local people to meet identified needs and should be for use as main residence. Much of it should be for rent. Where affordable property is owned, we believe that, on re-sale, for a stated period local people should have the first option to buy.
Q8 – Only applications which propose housing that meets real ecological sustainability targets (eg. high energy efficiency) and caters for identified needs (eg for small/affordable/disability-friendly housing), should be considered for consent. We cannot offer advice on how this approach could be promoted.
My brief, mainly landscape comments on the further additional sites are attached.
[SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT]
