Response from Mr Robert Peck (Individual)
1. Mr Robert Peck (Individual) : 30 Nov 2017 10:01:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show that you have read the guidance notes accompanying this consultation.
I have read the guidance notes
Appendices, maps or other
General comment / comment on procedure
1.1 Do you consider the AONB DPD to be legally compliant?
Yes
1.3 Do you consider the AONB DPD to be sound?
Yes
1.5 Please give details of why you consider the DPD is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate. Please be as precise as possible.
If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the DPD or its compliance with the Duty to Cooperate, please also use this box to set out your comments.
I support the soundness of the AONB DPD because it embodies the reasons that the AONB exists. The protection of intrinsic beauty and geography is recognised in the DPD. Although I don't have technical knowledge in the area of statutory obligations I recognise that the way the plan interprets statute and holds to the purpose of the AONB is clearly represented in the plan. I support the way the plan protects the distinctiveness of local nature and amenity. Drainage is a particular issue in Silverdale and I'm glad the plan acknowledges the peculiar issues this presents to development here.
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, recommendations published and adopted.
Please notify me
