Response from Mr and Mrs Alwyn and Joan Gee (Individual)
1. Mr and Mrs Alwyn and Joan Gee (Individual) : 2 Sep 2013 11:43:00
Please add your response below, quoting the further proposed main modification reference number or relevant document title including reference to section / page / paragraph: (limit 3000 words)
Proposed development MM072U
Re: 27 to 71 properties at Hoad View
We are dismayed to learn of the proposal to extend the number of properties at Hoad View from 27 to 71. Such consideration almost defies belief. Is no one concerned with our safely?
To accommodate the much increased traffic flow along Union Lane to serve the 27 properties presently being constructed, the road width opposite our property has been increased by a miserable sixteen inches, at very substantial cost, when we asked during pre-build consultation for at least another six feet, on safety grounds, which could have been easily accomplished at negligible additional expense.
Mr Dellow is correct regarding the junction dangers but, additionally, the road width for traffic generated by a further forty-four properties is totally unsatisfactory.
We fully expect to be ignored once again but live in hope that common sense may still prevail.
Joan & Alwyn Gee.
