3 responses from Mrs Eileen Drinkall (Individual)
1. Mrs Eileen Drinkall (Individual) : 17 May 2012 11:38:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R339# ALLITHWAITE LAND SOUTH OF GREEN LANE
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I have fought to keep this field green for over forty year and again I will try again to
keep this green field.
This field is the only green field here; over the past forty years the village has grown
too big to be a village. Templand Park, Greendales, High cliff drive, Mayshelles
orchard, uplands fellside, Jack hill, Hazledene, plus in fill. Farm buildings and shops
have been converted to dwellings and shops. In Allithithwaite we have one shop/post
office which services this area.
The proposed dwellings on filed number R319, between Green lane and boarbank
lane, would increase traffic and parking, which there are already problems with on
these 2 roads, the sewerage system is old and would be inadequate for another 22
dwellings.By building on this land would be taking away residents on Green lane
and Boarbank roads only green field.
We are asking that other land be considered on the right hand side of Holme lane
fields NO RN230 AND RN65, the reason we ask for this land to be considered is
there is better access for cars it would mean traffic would not be brought threw the
centre of the village passed the school reducing the risk of accidents.
My final point is the village has already expanded and is now bigger than a village
yet it has no business to offer employment to people from the village, so to increase
housing without the facilities such as jobs would be of no benefit to the village.
I do understand there is a shortage of housing within this area, and many others in
the country, but rather than just build housing for the sake of building I would ask that
they be built on suitable sites with the least impact on the present residents.
2. Mrs Eileen Drinkall (Individual) : 17 May 2012 11:39:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - Site Omission
If you have selected a ‘Site omission’ please enter the site reference or location and relevant policy below
Site omission - Ref RN230
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I have fought to keep this field green for over forty year and again I will try again to
keep this green field.
This field is the only green field here; over the past forty years the village has grown
too big to be a village. Templand Park, Greendales, High cliff drive, Mayshelles
orchard, uplands fellside, Jack hill, Hazledene, plus in fill. Farm buildings and shops
have been converted to dwellings and shops. In Allithithwaite we have one shop/post
office which services this area.
The proposed dwellings on filed number R319, between Green lane and boarbank
lane, would increase traffic and parking, which there are already problems with on
these 2 roads, the sewerage system is old and would be inadequate for another 22
dwellings.By building on this land would be taking away residents on Green lane
and Boarbank roads only green field.
We are asking that other land be considered on the right hand side of Holme lane
fields NO RN230 AND RN65, the reason we ask for this land to be considered is
there is better access for cars it would mean traffic would not be brought threw the
centre of the village passed the school reducing the risk of accidents.
My final point is the village has already expanded and is now bigger than a village
yet it has no business to offer employment to people from the village, so to increase
housing without the facilities such as jobs would be of no benefit to the village.
I do understand there is a shortage of housing within this area, and many others in
the country, but rather than just build housing for the sake of building I would ask that
they be built on suitable sites with the least impact on the present residents.
3. Mrs Eileen Drinkall (Individual) : 17 May 2012 11:40:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - Site Omission
If you have selected a ‘Site omission’ please enter the site reference or location and relevant policy below
Site omission - Ref RN65
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I have fought to keep this field green for over forty year and again I will try again to
keep this green field.
This field is the only green field here; over the past forty years the village has grown
too big to be a village. Templand Park, Greendales, High cliff drive, Mayshelles
orchard, uplands fellside, Jack hill, Hazledene, plus in fill. Farm buildings and shops
have been converted to dwellings and shops. In Allithithwaite we have one shop/post
office which services this area.
The proposed dwellings on filed number R319, between Green lane and boarbank
lane, would increase traffic and parking, which there are already problems with on
these 2 roads, the sewerage system is old and would be inadequate for another 22
dwellings.By building on this land would be taking away residents on Green lane
and Boarbank roads only green field.
We are asking that other land be considered on the right hand side of Holme lane
fields NO RN230 AND RN65, the reason we ask for this land to be considered is
there is better access for cars it would mean traffic would not be brought threw the
centre of the village passed the school reducing the risk of accidents.
My final point is the village has already expanded and is now bigger than a village
yet it has no business to offer employment to people from the village, so to increase
housing without the facilities such as jobs would be of no benefit to the village.
I do understand there is a shortage of housing within this area, and many others in
the country, but rather than just build housing for the sake of building I would ask that
they be built on suitable sites with the least impact on the present residents.
