3 responses from C Jones (Individual)
1. C Jones (Individual) : 8 May 2012 13:00:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R697 & part R242 ULVERSTON CROFTLANDS EAST
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
It is unnecessary to destroy green space when there are areas that need to be redeveloped ("eyesores" to the area) and brown field sites. Don't take the beauty and tourist appeal out of the area.
We need to keep farm land for that purpose.
The site from Colthouse Lane to Priory Road would become over-developed - do we really need this number of houses in Ulverston?
Please re-think the long term impact on our area if you continue to destroy our 'green spaces' - don't destroy our countryside.
2. C Jones (Individual) : 8 May 2012 13:04:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R690ulv, R691ULV, R126M, RN184, RN234# & part R242 ULVERSTON CROFTLANDS WEST - NOOK FARM
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
It is unnecessary to destroy green space when there are areas that need to be redeveloped ("eyesores" to the area) and brown field sites. Don't take the beauty and tourist appeal out of the area.
We need to keep farm land for that purpose.
The site from Colthouse Lane to Priory Road would become over-developed - do we really need this number of houses in Ulverston?
Please re-think the long term impact on our area if you continue to destroy our 'green spaces' - don't destroy our countryside.
3. C Jones (Individual) : 8 May 2012 13:06:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN131M,RN141#, RN321# &RN284# Ulverston - Gascow Farm
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
It is unnecessary to destroy green space when there are areas that need to be redeveloped ("eyesores" to the area) and brown field sites. Don't take the beauty and tourist appeal out of the area.
We need to keep farm land for that purpose.
The site from Colthouse Lane to Priory Road would become over-developed - do we really need this number of houses in Ulverston?
Please re-think the long term impact on our area if you continue to destroy our 'green spaces' - don't destroy our countryside.
