8 responses from Lady Anne Graham (Individual)
1. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 19 Apr 2012 10:31:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Grange-over-Sands sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
2. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 19 Apr 2012 10:39:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Cartmel sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
3. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 19 Apr 2012 10:44:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Flookburgh sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
4. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 19 Apr 2012 10:45:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Allithwaite sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
5. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:25:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.1 Mixed Use Allocation at Berners Pool, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
6. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:29:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.2 Mixed Use Allocation at Land South of Allithwaite Road, Kent's Bank, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
7. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:34:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.3 Mixed Use Allocation at Guide's Lot, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
8. Lady Anne Graham (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:35:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - EN42# CARK STATION YARD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I wish to object in the strongest terms to the adoption of the above plan.
There are few remaining greenfield sites between Grange-over-Sands and Kents Bank. It is crucial that these should be retained in order to spearate these communities and thus avoid an undesirable urban sprawl. The same point applies equally to Kents Bank and Allithwaite and to Cartmel, Cark and Flookburgh. These are all SEPARATE communities and should remain so.
If the SLDC consider that a large number of 'affordable' homes are needed in the District, then the SLDC should provide them on 'brown' field sites, together with the necessary infrastructure, and with the necessary financial help from the government (possibly in conjunction with housing associations).
