3 responses from Mr John Gill (Individual)
1. Mr John Gill (Individual) : 14 Apr 2012 22:16:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.1 Development Boundaries- ENDMOOR
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
Yes
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
1 Density of houses on the site should be greatly reduced
2 A recent survey by the parish council showed a need for 10 houses, your proposal of 100 is not
acceptable and would show an increase of 48% of the village
3 Little thought of the sewerage system in and around Endmoor which is already running about its
capacity . Do we take this, that the new site would be having its own sewerage system.
4 Endmoor and district with its narrow roads and country lanes infrastructure would be stretched
beyond possibility.
5 Regarding another industrial site, we just do not need one. Summerlands and Gatebeck sites have
many sites vacant.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
The village of Endmoor with a shop and an outreach Post office is no place for a development of this
size. I am not against any development, but its got to fit in with the area, to be in proportion.
The 100 houses and the pressures it would bring would cause the fragile infrastructure to collapse,
and the lack of consultation brings the soundness in to very much doubt.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mr John Gill (Individual) : 18 May 2012 14:05:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M41M ENDMOOR NORTH OF SYCAMORE DRIVE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
Yes
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
1 Density of houses on the site should be greatly reduced
2 A recent survey by the parish council showed a need for 10 houses, your proposal of 100 is not
acceptable and would show an increase of 48% of the village
3 Little thought of the sewerage system in and around Endmoor which is already running about its
capacity . Do we take this, that the new site would be having its own sewerage system.
4 Endmoor and district with its narrow roads and country lanes infrastructure would be stretched
beyond possibility.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
The village of Endmoor with a shop and an outreach Post office is no place for a development of this
size. I am not against any development, but its got to fit in with the area, to be in proportion.
The 100 houses and the pressures it would bring would cause the fragile infrastructure to collapse,
and the lack of consultation brings the soundness in to very much doubt.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
3. Mr John Gill (Individual) : 18 May 2012 14:11:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - EN20, EN33# ENDMOOR LAND NORTH OF GATEBECK LANE, GATEBECK
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
Yes
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
5 Regarding another industrial site, we just do not need one. Summerlands and Gatebeck sites have many sites vacant.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
