4 responses from Mrs Tracey Vickers (Individual)
1. Mrs Tracey Vickers (Individual) : 2 Mar 2012 13:39:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R689 ULVM ULVERSTON NORTH URSWICK ROAD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The proposed plans for R689ULVM need to be removed. Urswick Road can not support any more houses.Already the sewers have to be drained regularly as they cannot cope with the demand already.During periods of heavy rain much surface water is on Urswick Road and I worry about where this will then go when the fields are removed. The junction from main road onto ulverston road and towards Pennington C of E school is already hugely dangerous and often cars are sat there for several minutes before they can pull onto the A590 and then turning towards Pennington School. The increase in volume of traffic is only going to make this worse and put peoples lives at risk. Why is more housing being considered when there are already lots of empty houses sitting around Ulverston? People are already struggling to sell there houses on Ulverston Road because of the volume of traffic and these proposals are only going to make this worse. Why should I lose the value of my home because of the addition of new houses. The proposed build at R690ULV, R691ULV,R126M is also ridiculous and will put a huge strain of resources that are already there. Urswick Road is already a cut through for people living in Croftlands and Ulverston and the increase in traffic that new housing will bring is unfair to the people who already live there, will put childrens lives at risk and damage the roads more than they already are. What is wrong is expanding some of the other settlements of gleaston and scales why does Ulverston and Swarthmoor have to be expanded any further. The A590 is a notorious road with the quantity of lorries that travel along it on roads that are unsuitable, further traffic is only going to exacerbate this further. How are the local primary schools suppossed to cope? Most are over subscribed as it is and the beauty of many of these schools is that they are not that large, so the children get a more nurtured start to their schooling. I am oppossed to all the proposed sites around Urswick Road as it will affect the quality of life of those people who have worked hard in order to live here. If only these plans were for the benefit of those who actually already live in these areas and not about other people making money. I am not prepared for my house to lose value and for myself and my family to be out of pocket for all our hard work.
2. Mrs Tracey Vickers (Individual) : 15 May 2012 14:11:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R690ulv, R691ULV, R126M, RN184, RN234# & part R242 ULVERSTON CROFTLANDS WEST - NOOK FARM
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The proposed plans for R689ULVM need to be removed. Urswick Road can not support any more houses.Already the sewers have to be drained regularly as they cannot cope with the demand already.During periods of heavy rain much surface water is on Urswick Road and I worry about where this will then go when the fields are removed. The junction from main road onto ulverston road and towards Pennington C of E school is already hugely dangerous and often cars are sat there for several minutes before they can pull onto the A590 and then turning towards Pennington School. The increase in volume of traffic is only going to make this worse and put peoples lives at risk. Why is more housing being considered when there are already lots of empty houses sitting around Ulverston? People are already struggling to sell there houses on Ulverston Road because of the volume of traffic and these proposals are only going to make this worse. Why should I lose the value of my home because of the addition of new houses. The proposed build at R690ULV, R691ULV,R126M is also ridiculous and will put a huge strain of resources that are already there. Urswick Road is already a cut through for people living in Croftlands and Ulverston and the increase in traffic that new housing will bring is unfair to the people who already live there, will put childrens lives at risk and damage the roads more than they already are. What is wrong is expanding some of the other settlements of gleaston and scales why does Ulverston and Swarthmoor have to be expanded any further. The A590 is a notorious road with the quantity of lorries that travel along it on roads that are unsuitable, further traffic is only going to exacerbate this further. How are the local primary schools suppossed to cope? Most are over subscribed as it is and the beauty of many of these schools is that they are not that large, so the children get a more nurtured start to their schooling. I am oppossed to all the proposed sites around Urswick Road as it will affect the quality of life of those people who have worked hard in order to live here. If only these plans were for the benefit of those who actually already live in these areas and not about other people making money. I am not prepared for my house to lose value and for myself and my family to be out of pocket for all our hard work.
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
3. Mrs Tracey Vickers (Individual) : 15 May 2012 14:12:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Ulverston sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The proposed plans for R689ULVM need to be removed. Urswick Road can not support any more houses.Already the sewers have to be drained regularly as they cannot cope with the demand already.During periods of heavy rain much surface water is on Urswick Road and I worry about where this will then go when the fields are removed. The junction from main road onto ulverston road and towards Pennington C of E school is already hugely dangerous and often cars are sat there for several minutes before they can pull onto the A590 and then turning towards Pennington School. The increase in volume of traffic is only going to make this worse and put peoples lives at risk. Why is more housing being considered when there are already lots of empty houses sitting around Ulverston? People are already struggling to sell there houses on Ulverston Road because of the volume of traffic and these proposals are only going to make this worse. Why should I lose the value of my home because of the addition of new houses. The proposed build at R690ULV, R691ULV,R126M is also ridiculous and will put a huge strain of resources that are already there. Urswick Road is already a cut through for people living in Croftlands and Ulverston and the increase in traffic that new housing will bring is unfair to the people who already live there, will put childrens lives at risk and damage the roads more than they already are. What is wrong is expanding some of the other settlements of gleaston and scales why does Ulverston and Swarthmoor have to be expanded any further. The A590 is a notorious road with the quantity of lorries that travel along it on roads that are unsuitable, further traffic is only going to exacerbate this further. How are the local primary schools suppossed to cope? Most are over subscribed as it is and the beauty of many of these schools is that they are not that large, so the children get a more nurtured start to their schooling. I am oppossed to all the proposed sites around Urswick Road as it will affect the quality of life of those people who have worked hard in order to live here. If only these plans were for the benefit of those who actually already live in these areas and not about other people making money. I am not prepared for my house to lose value and for myself and my family to be out of pocket for all our hard work.
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
4. Mrs Tracey Vickers (Individual) : 15 May 2012 14:13:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Swarthmoor sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The proposed plans for R689ULVM need to be removed. Urswick Road can not support any more houses.Already the sewers have to be drained regularly as they cannot cope with the demand already.During periods of heavy rain much surface water is on Urswick Road and I worry about where this will then go when the fields are removed. The junction from main road onto ulverston road and towards Pennington C of E school is already hugely dangerous and often cars are sat there for several minutes before they can pull onto the A590 and then turning towards Pennington School. The increase in volume of traffic is only going to make this worse and put peoples lives at risk. Why is more housing being considered when there are already lots of empty houses sitting around Ulverston? People are already struggling to sell there houses on Ulverston Road because of the volume of traffic and these proposals are only going to make this worse. Why should I lose the value of my home because of the addition of new houses. The proposed build at R690ULV, R691ULV,R126M is also ridiculous and will put a huge strain of resources that are already there. Urswick Road is already a cut through for people living in Croftlands and Ulverston and the increase in traffic that new housing will bring is unfair to the people who already live there, will put childrens lives at risk and damage the roads more than they already are. What is wrong is expanding some of the other settlements of gleaston and scales why does Ulverston and Swarthmoor have to be expanded any further. The A590 is a notorious road with the quantity of lorries that travel along it on roads that are unsuitable, further traffic is only going to exacerbate this further. How are the local primary schools suppossed to cope? Most are over subscribed as it is and the beauty of many of these schools is that they are not that large, so the children get a more nurtured start to their schooling. I am oppossed to all the proposed sites around Urswick Road as it will affect the quality of life of those people who have worked hard in order to live here. If only these plans were for the benefit of those who actually already live in these areas and not about other people making money. I am not prepared for my house to lose value and for myself and my family to be out of pocket for all our hard work.
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
