4 responses from Mrs Elizabeth Laidlaw (Individual)
1. Mrs Elizabeth Laidlaw (Individual) : 17 Apr 2012 16:53:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.1 Development Boundaries- ENDMOOR
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
Sustainability Appraisal has not been carried out and its baseline information and conclusions have not been used to inform the DPD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
• Building to the north of Endmoor will spoil the skyline from the North and East and will resemble an urban sprawl.
• The M41M plan shows an increased numbers of dwellings from 68 to 100 which the village was not consulted on. 68 is too dense for the area. The services in the village do not match the needs of this many extra houses. There is no agreed Infrastructure Plan with United Utilities to upgrade the sewerage system to support any new development.
• Development of area M41M would be a major intrusion on the landscape visible from a wide area of surrounding countryside and roads. This is a greenfield site but there are alternative 'brown fields' in the area which could be considered.
• I am strongly opposed to development South of Dove Nest Lane – R670, because of the extra traffic and its unsuitability on access, insufficient sewerage capacity and run off grounds.
• The number of houses proposed for Endmoor is out of proportion for the size of the village when larger settlements have fewer houses proposed.
• Endmoor is barely a village as it has no pub, post office or church. The bus service is infrequent and expensive and the railway over four miles away.
• I can see no justification for another employment site when there are plenty of vacant units in the area.
• There is an adequate supply of market housing available for sale; some properties in Endmoor have been on the market for 2 years or more.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mrs Elizabeth Laidlaw (Individual) : 16 May 2012 14:48:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Endmoor sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
Sustainability Appraisal has not been carried out and its baseline information and conclusions have not been used to inform the DPD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
• The number of houses proposed for Endmoor is out of proportion for the size of the village when larger settlements have fewer houses proposed.
• Endmoor is barely a village as it has no pub, post office or church. The bus service is infrequent and expensive and the railway over four miles away.
• I can see no justification for another employment site when there are plenty of vacant units in the area.
• There is an adequate supply of market housing available for sale; some properties in Endmoor have been on the market for 2 years or more.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
3. Mrs Elizabeth Laidlaw (Individual) : 16 May 2012 14:52:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M41M ENDMOOR NORTH OF SYCAMORE DRIVE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
Sustainability Appraisal has not been carried out and its baseline information and conclusions have not been used to inform the DPD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
• Building to the north of Endmoor will spoil the skyline from the North and East and will resemble an urban sprawl.
• The M41M plan shows an increased numbers of dwellings from 68 to 100 which the village was not consulted on. 68 is too dense for the area. The services in the village do not match the needs of this many extra houses. There is no agreed Infrastructure Plan with United Utilities to upgrade the sewerage system to support any new development.
• Development of area M41M would be a major intrusion on the landscape visible from a wide area of surrounding countryside and roads. This is a greenfield site but there are alternative 'brown fields' in the area which could be considered.
• The number of houses proposed for Endmoor is out of proportion for the size of the village when larger settlements have fewer houses proposed.
• Endmoor is barely a village as it has no pub, post office or church. The bus service is infrequent and expensive and the railway over four miles away.
• I can see no justification for another employment site when there are plenty of vacant units in the area.
• There is an adequate supply of market housing available for sale; some properties in Endmoor have been on the market for 2 years or more.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
4. Mrs Elizabeth Laidlaw (Individual) : 16 May 2012 15:05:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R670-mod ENDMOOR SOUTH OF BOWLING GREEN
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
Sustainability Appraisal has not been carried out and its baseline information and conclusions have not been used to inform the DPD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
• I am strongly opposed to development South of Dove Nest Lane – R670, because of the extra traffic and its unsuitability on access, insufficient sewerage capacity and run off grounds.
• The number of houses proposed for Endmoor is out of proportion for the size of the village when larger settlements have fewer houses proposed.
• Endmoor is barely a village as it has no pub, post office or church. The bus service is infrequent and expensive and the railway over four miles away.
• I can see no justification for another employment site when there are plenty of vacant units in the area.
• There is an adequate supply of market housing available for sale; some properties in Endmoor have been on the market for 2 years or more.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
