3 responses from Mr Stuart Fisher (Individual)
1. Mr Stuart Fisher (Individual) : 17 Apr 2012 14:48:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Arnside sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The processes of community involvement in developing the DPD are not in general accordance of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
The DPD has not had regard to national policy and does not conform generally with the adopted Core Strategy and (until it is abolished) the Regional Spatial Strategy
The DPD has not had regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
SLDC ought to listen to the local community and take on board their efforts to create a viable plan for the village
SLDC should ensure that the DPD is compliant with the NPPF's requirements to give AONBs the highest level of protection and that no major development will be allowed.
It should provide clear evidence, as required by the NPPF, of close cooperation with Lancaster City Council. A joint approach to the whole of the AONB ought to have been a given.
Changes also need to be made to comply with SLDC's Core strategy bearing in mind that it has to have "due regard" to the Arnside/Silverdale AONB's designation - which is "to enhance and protect".
The sequential use of sites should be a primary objective in accordance with the Core Strategy.
1.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
Where is the space to explain that I disagree with SLDC's Land Allocations? Leading questions should not be included in an exercise like this.
This last part of the consultation process has been very complicated. I have struggled with it and know of several people who have given up.
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I support the Arnside Parich Plan Trust in its efforts to deal with the problems facing Arnsied and its solutions to create a viable village.
In addition I would like to point to the discrepancy between the minimum site size of 0.3ha and Policy H3 of the Local Plan "The Council will give preference to proposals for development on previously developed sites in sustainable locations, whether such sites are allocated or not".
The first allows the Council to ignore all proposed brownfield sites in Arnside, while the second allows it to bring these sites back at a later date thereby increasing the number of houses well above the allocated 81+11 outstanding planning permissions.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
I do not, but will repeat my support for the Arnside Parish Plan Trust
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mr Stuart Fisher (Individual) : 15 May 2012 12:47:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Paragraph No.
1.9
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The processes of community involvement in developing the DPD are not in general accordance of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
The DPD has not had regard to national policy and does not conform generally with the adopted Core Strategy and (until it is abolished) the Regional Spatial Strategy
The DPD has not had regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Where is the space to explain that I disagree with SLDC's Land Allocations? Leading questions should not be included in an exercise like this.
This last part of the consultation process has been very complicated. I have struggled with it and know of several people who have given up.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
3. Mr Stuart Fisher (Individual) : 15 May 2012 12:49:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Paragraph No.
1.10
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The processes of community involvement in developing the DPD are not in general accordance of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
The DPD has not had regard to national policy and does not conform generally with the adopted Core Strategy and (until it is abolished) the Regional Spatial Strategy
The DPD has not had regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
SLDC ought to listen to the local community and take on board their efforts to create a viable plan for the village
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
