2 responses from Mr John Bryers (Individual)
1. Mr John Bryers (Individual) : 21 Mar 2012 21:39:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA2.4 Land at Kendal Parks
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
Yes
1.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
The PDP does appear to be very detailed. In fact so detailed it makes it nealry impossible for the common working man to interpret or indeed read all the supplied documents. This is possibly why my council tax is higher than I would wish.
However, I accept the DPD does address the key points around noise attenuation, Great Crested Newts and flood risk.
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Traffic Assessment and Travel plans do not consider current access and egress on and around Kendal Parks. Based on 28 years experience driving and parking in this area. It is a high health and Safety risk.
Green belt restrictions seem to have been ignored. Traffic access and egress around Kendal Parks estate would clearly indicate no further building to the East of Kendal Parks could possibly go ahead, hence any Traffic Assessment report is flawed for this development. There would be an issue with Blue Light Vehicles for access now, never mind when we build another 200 houses.
There are no local amenities for these new homes, so pressure on home owners would be to have a vehicle. There is no way a bus would be able to give these residents direct access to this service.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
None
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mr John Bryers (Individual) : 18 May 2012 15:00:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R107M mod and R150M KENDAL KENDAL PARKS
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
Yes
1.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
The PDP does appear to be very detailed. In fact so detailed it makes it nealry impossible for the common working man to interpret or indeed read all the supplied documents. This is possibly why my council tax is higher than I would wish.
However, I accept the DPD does address the key points around noise attenuation, Great Crested Newts and flood risk.
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Traffic Assessment and Travel plans do not consider current access and egress on and around Kendal Parks. Based on 28 years experience driving and parking in this area. It is a high health and Safety risk.
Green belt restrictions seem to have been ignored. Traffic access and egress around Kendal Parks estate would clearly indicate no further building to the East of Kendal Parks could possibly go ahead, hence any Traffic Assessment report is flawed for this development. There would be an issue with Blue Light Vehicles for access now, never mind when we build another 200 houses.
There are no local amenities for these new homes, so pressure on home owners would be to have a vehicle. There is no way a bus would be able to give these residents direct access to this service.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
