2 responses from Mr Colin Stamper (Individual)
1. Mr Colin Stamper (Individual) : 11 Apr 2012 13:58:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - RN117M KENDAL WEST OF VALLEY DRIVE
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The Land Allocations Document (DPD) is not within the Local Development Scheme and the key stages have not been followed
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Comunity Involvment Process with the DPDis not in accordance with the SCT
1.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
I do not have any support in all the land developement of Kendal and district
No personal involvement with the people near to any developement,
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
No credible evidence has been gathered nor any local community members views gathered. No councillors have bothered to ask the very people who elected them what problems / concers they have.
Reasonable alternatives (Brown Field sites) have not been addressed.
The number of people wanting homes has been vastly overstated, just look at the number of vacant properties in and around Kendal.
It seems that the whole scheme has been pushed through in great hast by a very few councillors. Could this be due to coming government legislation ???????
The wellbeing of Kendalians has been totally overlooked, perhaps the Lib. councillors who voted YES should consider that there is enough disgruntalled voters to take them out of office. Who in their right mind ignores a 98% no.
Simply put Kendal is FULL and does not need or indeed can sustain any more developement, nor do we need these so called representatives on the council who ignore our views.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
No Support
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mr Colin Stamper (Individual) : 18 May 2012 11:41:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Kendal sites
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The Land Allocations Document (DPD) is not within the Local Development Scheme and the key stages have not been followed
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Comunity Involvment Process with the DPDis not in accordance with the SCT
1.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
I do not have any support in all the land developement of Kendal and district
No personal involvement with the people near to any developement,
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
No credible evidence has been gathered nor any local community members views gathered. No councillors have bothered to ask the very people who elected them what problems / concers they have.
Reasonable alternatives (Brown Field sites) have not been addressed.
The number of people wanting homes has been vastly overstated, just look at the number of vacant properties in and around Kendal.
It seems that the whole scheme has been pushed through in great hast by a very few councillors. Could this be due to coming government legislation ???????
The wellbeing of Kendalians has been totally overlooked, perhaps the Lib. councillors who voted YES should consider that there is enough disgruntalled voters to take them out of office. Who in their right mind ignores a 98% no.
Simply put Kendal is FULL and does not need or indeed can sustain any more developement, nor do we need these so called representatives on the council who ignore our views.
2.4 Use this space to explain your support for the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD.
No support
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
