4 responses from Mr Edward Scott (Individual)
1. Mr Edward Scott (Individual) : 11 Apr 2012 16:12:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Grange-over-Sands sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I believe the proposals for Grange and District have not taken into account my objection regarding the Cartmel Road location, the distress to wildlife, badgers and now deer, the already extremely awkward junction with Kents Bank Road and access into Cartmel Road itself and furthermore the dreadful pressures of additional homes in addition to the supermarket at the Windermere Road roundabout. I believe a local referendum would show a significant unsound vote.
2. Mr Edward Scott (Individual) : 25 Apr 2012 08:12:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.1 Mixed Use Allocation at Berners Pool, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I believe the proposals for Grange and District have not taken into account my objection regarding the Cartmel Road location, the distress to wildlife, badgers and now deer, the already extremely awkward junction with Kents Bank Road and access into Cartmel Road itself and furthermore the dreadful pressures of additional homes in addition to the supermarket at the Windermere Road roundabout. I believe a local referendum would show a significant unsound vote.
3. Mr Edward Scott (Individual) : 25 Apr 2012 08:13:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.2 Mixed Use Allocation at Land South of Allithwaite Road, Kent's Bank, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I believe the proposals for Grange and District have not taken into account my objection regarding the Cartmel Road location, the distress to wildlife, badgers and now deer, the already extremely awkward junction with Kents Bank Road and access into Cartmel Road itself and furthermore the dreadful pressures of additional homes in addition to the supermarket at the Windermere Road roundabout. I believe a local referendum would show a significant unsound vote.
4. Mr Edward Scott (Individual) : 25 Apr 2012 08:15:00
Policy/Site No.
LA3.3 Mixed Use Allocation at Guide's Lot, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I believe the proposals for Grange and District have not taken into account my objection regarding the Cartmel Road location, the distress to wildlife, badgers and now deer, the already extremely awkward junction with Kents Bank Road and access into Cartmel Road itself and furthermore the dreadful pressures of additional homes in addition to the supermarket at the Windermere Road roundabout. I believe a local referendum would show a significant unsound vote.