3 responses from Mr Richard Bagguley (Individual)
1. Mr Richard Bagguley (Individual) : 17 Apr 2012 16:51:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - R81 ARNSIDE REDHILLS ROAD
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The processes of community involvement in developing the DPD are not in general accordance of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
The DPD has not had regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Changes are needed in order to comply with the NPPF. There is a lack of sound evidence in the current DPD which does not comply with SLDC's core strategy.
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
1.The Land allocated is a green field site which has been accorded 'Important Open Space' status within the AONB for many years.The SLDC proposal has failed to explain or justify its significant policy change notwithstanding 'the highest level of protection'accorded such sites.
2. The SLDC has not given consideration/priority to brown field sites in the land allocations as could reasonably be expected by not only the residents but also visitors and be demanded of the managers,custodians and guardians of the area.
3. The SLDC has given little or no consideration for the impact of their proposals on the importance of the land to the local community or the tourism trade given the strategic position of the land and its use as a currently picturesque route to and from Arnside Knott.
4. The SLDC has failed to demonstrate how it will deliver on the need for affordable rented social housing and maintain that provision. Past experience questions the local authority's ability to maintain its commitment in this regard.
The SLDC has failed to demonstrate anything other than minimal need and certainly not 'exceptional need' for market housing
5.We have carefully considered and agree with the comments and objections raised by and on behalf of the Arnside Parish Plan Trust and Arnside Parish Council.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
2. Mr Richard Bagguley (Individual) : 8 May 2012 15:08:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Arnside sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
2. The SLDC has not given consideration/priority to brown field sites in the land allocations as could reasonably be expected by not only the residents but also visitors and be demanded of the managers,custodians and guardians of the area.
3. The SLDC has given little or no consideration for the impact of their proposals on the importance of the land to the local community or the tourism trade given the strategic position of the land and its use as a currently picturesque route to and from Arnside Knott.
4. The SLDC has failed to demonstrate how it will deliver on the need for affordable rented social housing and maintain that provision. Past experience questions the local authority's ability to maintain its commitment in this regard.
The SLDC has failed to demonstrate anything other than minimal need and certainly not 'exceptional need' for market housing
5.We have carefully considered and agree with the comments and objections raised by and on behalf of the Arnside Parish Plan Trust and Arnside Parish Council.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me
3. Mr Richard Bagguley (Individual) : 8 May 2012 15:12:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Paragraph No.
0.0 Whole Document
1.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is legally compliant?
No
1.2 If NO please identify which test of legal compliance your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 1.3.
The processes of community involvement in developing the DPD are not in general accordance of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
The DPD has not had regard to the Sustainable Community Strategy
1.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD legally compliant, having regard to the test you have identified at question 1.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Changes are needed in order to comply with the NPPF. There is a lack of sound evidence in the current DPD which does not comply with SLDC's core strategy.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
Please tick the box if you wish to be notified when the document is submitted, published and adopted.
Please notify me