8 responses from Mr Charles Reid (Individual)
1. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 23 Apr 2012 12:35:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Grange-over-Sands sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are not effective, justified or consistent with national strategy for the
following reasons:-
Lib. Dem. Controlled SLDC has completely ignored the wishes of local residents
who are completely opposed to these plans.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will.harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surroundmg area.
!he cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
The infrastructure of Grange over Sands cannot cope with all these extra houses. The
roads in particular could not cope with the extra traffic generated especially in Main Street Grange and Risedale Hill. There would be increased risk of surface water flooding. There would be inadequate school places and primary health care facilities to cope with the extra population. There are no plans to improve any of these.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
2. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 23 Apr 2012 12:37:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Allithwaite sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surrounding area.
The cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
3. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 23 Apr 2012 12:39:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Cartmel sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surrounding area.
The cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
4. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 23 Apr 2012 12:41:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - All Flookburgh sites
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surrounding area.
The cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
5. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:09:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA3.1 Mixed Use Allocation at Berners Pool, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are not effective, justified or consistent with national strategy for the
following reasons:-
Lib. Dem. Controlled SLDC has completely ignored the wishes of local residents
who are completely opposed to these plans.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will.harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surroundmg area.
!he cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
The infrastructure of Grange over Sands cannot cope with all these extra houses. The
roads in particular could not cope with the extra traffic generated especially in Main Street Grange and Risedale Hill. There would be increased risk of surface water flooding. There would be inadequate school places and primary health care facilities to cope with the extra population. There are no plans to improve any of these.
6. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:11:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA3.2 Mixed Use Allocation at Land South of Allithwaite Road, Kent's Bank, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are not effective, justified or consistent with national strategy for the
following reasons:-
Lib. Dem. Controlled SLDC has completely ignored the wishes of local residents
who are completely opposed to these plans.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will.harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surroundmg area.
!he cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
The infrastructure of Grange over Sands cannot cope with all these extra houses. The
roads in particular could not cope with the extra traffic generated especially in Main Street Grange and Risedale Hill. There would be increased risk of surface water flooding. There would be inadequate school places and primary health care facilities to cope with the extra population. There are no plans to improve any of these.
7. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:13:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA3.3 Mixed Use Allocation at Guide's Lot, Grange-over-Sands
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are not effective, justified or consistent with national strategy for the
following reasons:-
Lib. Dem. Controlled SLDC has completely ignored the wishes of local residents
who are completely opposed to these plans.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will.harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surroundmg area.
!he cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
The infrastructure of Grange over Sands cannot cope with all these extra houses. The
roads in particular could not cope with the extra traffic generated especially in Main Street Grange and Risedale Hill. There would be increased risk of surface water flooding. There would be inadequate school places and primary health care facilities to cope with the extra population. There are no plans to improve any of these.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
8. Mr Charles Reid (Individual) : 30 Apr 2012 14:15:00
Before completing this online representation please tick the box to show you have read the 'Guidance Notes for Making a Representation'
I have read the guidance notes
Policy/Site No.
LA1.8 Local Employment Allocations - EN42# CARK STATION YARD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
The DPD is not effective in that the document is not deliverable, flexible or capable of being monitored.
The DPD is not consistent with national policy.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
The plans are not effective, justified or consistent with national strategy for the
following reasons:-
Lib. Dem. Controlled SLDC has completely ignored the wishes of local residents
who are completely opposed to these plans.
The plans are against SLDC's own policies on protecting green gaps and avoiding
Grange over Sands and Allithwaite having no open space between them.
The plan does not suggest other options for providing affordable housing other than
total destruction of green spaces.
The plan is based on the no longer applicable Regional Spatial Strategy and out date figures on population surveys and the number of houses proposed will not be required.
SLDC plans will.harm the local tourist industry which is vital to Grange over Sands and the surroundmg area.
!he cumulative effect of development across the whole Cartmel peninsula has been
ignored.
The infrastructure of Grange over Sands cannot cope with all these extra houses. The
roads in particular could not cope with the extra traffic generated especially in Main Street Grange and Risedale Hill. There would be increased risk of surface water flooding. There would be inadequate school places and primary health care facilities to cope with the extra population. There are no plans to improve any of these.
3.1 If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate in the oral part of the examination?
NO, I do not wish to participate at the oral examination
