2 responses from Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual)
1. Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual) : 9 May 2012 15:56:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M41KM KENDAL SOUTH OF LUMLEY ROAD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I am writing again to object to the proposed allocation of land for development to the south of Lumley Road (M41KM (please refer to origianl letter sent may 2008). Also I am objecting to the proposed allocation of land for development E4M. I do not consider the proposed alocations to be 'sound'.
The development of land M41KM and E4M will ruin the presently rural and attractive feel of the main A6 route as it enters this historical market town. Kendal is named the 'Gateway to the Lakes'; it is a vibrant heritage town. With this development its unique rural character will be much diminished.
The surrounding landscape in addition to the specific site allocations would be greatly affected. The A6 is already severely congested at certain times of the day - highway capacity and safety are two major issues that would have to be addressed with disastrous consequences for this very green edge of town. Inevitablty there would be a massive negative impact on the local wildlife and ecology.
These developments would be extremely detrimental to the reality of Kenal as the gateway to the world-famous Lake District National Park - Kendal our historiacl market town, visited by thousands of tourists every year, enjoying its rural, traditional feel set within a beautiful landscape.
I cannot see any changes which would make these proposed land allocations for development 'sound' other than for them to be deleted from the Land Allocations DPD.
2. Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual) : 9 May 2012 15:57:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.6 Strategic Employment Sites - E4M KENDAL LAND AT SCROGGS WOOD, MILNTHORPE ROAD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
I am writing again to object to the proposed allocation of land for development to the south of Lumley Road (M41KM (please refer to origianl letter sent may 2008). Also I am objecting to the proposed allocation of land for development E4M. I do not consider the proposed alocations to be 'sound'.
The development of land M41KM and E4M will ruin the presently rural and attractive feel of the main A6 route as it enters this historical market town. Kendal is named the 'Gateway to the Lakes'; it is a vibrant heritage town. With this development its unique rural character will be much diminished.
The surrounding landscape in addition to the specific site allocations would be greatly affected. The A6 is already severely congested at certain times of the day - highway capacity and safety are two major issues that would have to be addressed with disastrous consequences for this very green edge of town. Inevitablty there would be a massive negative impact on the local wildlife and ecology.
These developments would be extremely detrimental to the reality of Kenal as the gateway to the world-famous Lake District National Park - Kendal our historiacl market town, visited by thousands of tourists every year, enjoying its rural, traditional feel set within a beautiful landscape.
I cannot see any changes which would make these proposed land allocations for development 'sound' other than for them to be deleted from the Land Allocations DPD.