2 responses from Mr Arthur Mayo (Individual)
1. Mr Arthur Mayo (Individual) : 4 May 2012 15:15:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.3 Housing Allocations - M41KM KENDAL SOUTH OF LUMLEY ROAD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Soundness"
Is it sound to not to include the plans for road developments on all potential sites, e.g. the "back up" that happens on the A6 from the south, most of the time.
Should the last inspector's report not be given special credence.
Potential and future brownfield sites given priority over greenfield land.
Kendal as the "Gateway to the Lakes"
be left as it is as per the first inspector's report.
The land towards Scrogg's wood is very visible from the "Bye pass" and A6 also it is very undulating and could lead to skyline development.
Is it sound to have business parks to the south of Kendal, when this has been permitted to the north of the town.
Problems of sewage disposl are still occuring east of the A6 near to Scogg's wood
I hope that these few extra comments on "soundness" are of some help with everyone's deliberations.
Arthur Mayo
2. Mr Arthur Mayo (Individual) : 4 May 2012 15:16:00
Policy/Site No.
LA1.6 Strategic Employment Sites - E4M KENDAL LAND AT SCROGGS WOOD, MILNTHORPE ROAD
2.1 Do you consider that the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD is sound?
No
2.2 If NO please identify which test of soundness your representation relates to by selecting the relevant option(s) below and completing section 2.3.
The DPD is not justified in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and/or is not considered the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives.
2.3 Please give details of the change(s) you consider necessary to make the South Lakeland District Council Land Allocations DPD sound, having regard to the test you have identified at question 2.2 above.
It would be helpful if you could state your proposed change to the DPD and the reasons why you think it is necessary.
Soundness"
Is it sound to not to include the plans for road developments on all potential sites, e.g. the "back up" that happens on the A6 from the south, most of the time.
Should the last inspector's report not be given special credence.
Potential and future brownfield sites given priority over greenfield land.
Kendal as the "Gateway to the Lakes"
be left as it is as per the first inspector's report.
The land towards Scrogg's wood is very visible from the "Bye pass" and A6 also it is very undulating and could lead to skyline development.
Is it sound to have business parks to the south of Kendal, when this has been permitted to the north of the town.
Problems of sewage disposl are still occuring east of the A6 near to Scogg's wood
I hope that these few extra comments on "soundness" are of some help with everyone's deliberations.
Arthur Mayo