3 responses from Ms Sandie Almond (Individual)
1. Ms Sandie Almond (Individual) : 8 Sep 2011 11:58:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R642M and RN42
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Message Body
I wish to raise grounds for objection to some new proposed sites for development in Milnthorpe.
My comments are all with reference to 2 development boundaries:
MILNTHORPE R642M and RN42.
1 These are NOT new proposed sites. They have been looked at before and rejected in previous submissions.
2 Availability of farm and accompanying land is not planning grounds to grant residential development consent.
3 In order to support existing urbanisation, rural land and especially agricultural land should be maintained. this area should support an infill only policy.
4 The aglomeration and merging together of Milnthorpe and Ackenthwaite should be prevented, so as to preserve individual settlement identity.
5 A reference to "other" land use is useless. How can we accept something when we don't know what it is e.g. industrial, retail - Tescos etc.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
2. Ms Sandie Almond (Individual) : 8 Sep 2011 12:00:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN42
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Message Body
I wish to raise grounds for objection to some new proposed sites for development in Milnthorpe.
My comments are all with reference to 2 development boundaries:
MILNTHORPE R642M and RN42.
1 These are NOT new proposed sites. They have been looked at before and rejected in previous submissions.
2 Availability of farm and accompanying land is not planning grounds to grant residential development consent.
3 In order to support existing urbanisation, rural land and especially agricultural land should be maintained. this area should support an infill only policy.
4 The aglomeration and merging together of Milnthorpe and Ackenthwaite should be prevented, so as to preserve individual settlement identity.
5 A reference to "other" land use is useless. How can we accept something when we don't know what it is e.g. industrial, retail - Tescos etc.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
3. Ms Sandie Almond (Individual) : 30 Sep 2011 14:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R642M RN42
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
