Response from Ms Kay Percival (Individual)
1. Ms Kay Percival (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 11:58:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
South Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E19# MN6# M11M#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This should be kept as Greenfield site, otherwise this is going to end up as part of a ribbon development towards Swarthmoor and then Barrow.
I strongly oppose it being developed and losing Green Gap Protection.
If it were developed, it should not be used for retail under any circumstances - this would kill the town's vitality and vibrancy and:
a) bring traffic chaos - which I know as I travel the route daily is already severe at times
b) create an out of town centre which would mean people bypass the town
c) undermine local businesses and traders and Ulverston's vitality
d) not create any high value jobs, and put the money into the pockets of out of town superstores
I oppose any development, and particularly designation to retail
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Must be long term
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Should be a matter for consultation
