2 responses from Mr Richard Robinson, Robinsons
1. Mr Richard Robinson, Robinsons : 8 Sep 2011 18:02:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kirkby in Furness
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN11,RN329,RN211,RN13,RN63
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Having considered the identified alternative sites for housing at Kirkby in Furness these locations serve only to re-enforce my opinion that the well qualified professional planning team got it right first time, backed up by thorough and well thought through reasoning as to why housing should be located on R189M.
How creating a new access onto a busy A road, adjacent to an existing school entrance with all the ensuing vehicle manoeuvres and movements can be construed as a safer option is very difficult to see, as would be the case if RN11 were to be considered, even worse if RN329 were to be included.
Becksides narrow roads around existing house corners that jut out in to the road way preclude any large quantity of additional house holds being able to rely on this access safely, but will safely provide for the area identified in the emerging option plan.
RN63 is really a step out in to the open countryside, following the line of the A595
R211 along with RN11 if taken for development will affect the income of the present farmer who has already voiced his objection to development here in a previous consultation.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The local plan should continue in the same vein as when it started, do it once do it right. If in 2018 it is decided to change things then make a fresh start then.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
These sites should be identified and brought forward by the present planning team not expensive planning advisers paid for by well heeled incomers, these sites should then be restricted to people working in that particular locality similar to a new farm house that is attached to a quantity of land, this would hope fully keep the end use for these new homes under control and ensure that they were providing homes for genuine local residents who live and work within the locality.
2. Mr Richard Robinson, Robinsons : 8 Sep 2011 18:06:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kirkby in Furness
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN58
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
It is comforting to note that the council have now included an employment provision EN58 if this allocation is approved then the farmer may lose a little, compared with some one within the village who having started and made a success of running their own business, would benefit from having a designated area in which to establish their own premises, and operate along side Mooreland Stores and Mooreland Service station
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The local plan should continue in the same vein as when it started, do it once do it right. If in 2018 it is decided to change things then make a fresh start then.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
These sites should be identified and brought forward by the present planning team not expensive planning advisers paid for by well heeled incomers, these sites should then be restricted to people working in that particular locality similar to a new farm house that is attached to a quantity of land, this would hope fully keep the end use for these new homes under control and ensure that they were providing homes for genuine local residents who live and work within the locality.
