2 responses from Mr E Johnson (Individual)
1. Mr E Johnson (Individual) : 24 Aug 2011 10:20:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Castle Ward , Kendal
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R100#, R154#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Any visitor into Kendal off the M6 down the A684 is drawn by one of the best views of Kendal Castle across the two plots (R100 and R154)suggested for development in the alternative plans.
If Kendal is to grow and prosper as heritage/ food/ history town, to build houses and obscure the view would seem illogical. Its a great free advert.
Some weeks hundreds of visitors arrive at Castle Green Hotel with this view creating a good impression of the town.First impressions are important, there must be a better site for development.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The world is changing so fast, so difficult to know.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
2. Mr E Johnson (Individual) : 24 Oct 2011 08:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R121M, RN302#, ON50#
