3 responses from Mr John Fitch (Individual)
1. Mr John Fitch (Individual) : 15 Aug 2011 13:25:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN282# & RN295#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Sites are outside the accepted village boundary and are therefore in open countryside.
Access would be on to wholly unsuitable narrow lanes.
Traffic from the development would need to travel through the narrow village centre to access the A590.
Development would be clearly visible from the National Park amd would repreesent an unjustified green-field extension to the existing village.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
2. Mr John Fitch (Individual) : 15 Aug 2011 13:39:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN291#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The development of this site would be to the detriment of the village. Quite apart from the expansion of the village that this would represent, it would remove the open views from the village across the Lyth Vally and into the National Park.
The development would be likely to conflict with the site line for traffic turning in to the village from the Brigsteer direction.
The access from the development would be on to a narrow lane which, even if widened, would feed the additional traffic through the narrow centre of the village.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
3. Mr John Fitch (Individual) : 15 Aug 2011 13:41:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN123#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This is currently an eye-sore in the middle of the village and should be developed for residential use in a way sympathetic to the surrounding properties.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
