8 responses from Mr William Walker (Individual)
1. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 12:14:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN273 & RN272, RN198
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
It would be nonsense to built right next to the motorway. These sites in total are too large for a small village to cope with. There is no provision available for water,sewage,and any other services.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
As long as it takes within reason.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
2. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 11:30:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN273 & RN272, RN198
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
It would be nonsense to built right next to the motorway. These sites in total are too large for a small village to cope with. There is no provision available for water,sewage,and any other services.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
As long as it takes within reason.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
3. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 12:00:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN274, M35M, RN275
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
It would be nonsense to built right next to the railway and in isolation from the village. These sites in total are too large for a small village to cope with. There is no provision available for water,sewage,and any other services.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
reasonable time frame
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
4. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 15:01:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN197, RN272, RN271
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Outwith the village proper and intruding into greenbelt and amenity land. No main services, water, sewage. Western reference RN271 below canal and suceptible to flooding.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Time span in reasonable time.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement
5. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 15:05:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN283
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Outwith the village proper. Blight entrance to village on a dangerous approach road with blind-spots. Worst of all below the canal and hence flooding problems. Too near to the motorway noise.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
In reasonable time
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement
6. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 15:40:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN30M
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Wrong side of the main road outwith the village boundary, therefore no water,sewage, power etc. Too near the noise of the railway. Too near the main road which has a poor sightline. Too small for village needs.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Within reasonable time limits.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
7. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 15:48:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN294, MN33 & RN293
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
These sites are reasonable from the point of view that they are concentrated in the village proper and not such as other hopeless suggestions which "ring" the village perimeters intruding near to noisy motorways or railways.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
in reasonable time
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Option A for the simple reason it will be based on what is in everyone's interests. Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
8. Mr William Walker (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 16:09:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Holme & Holme Mills
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN44 & RN151
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Both sites suitable for industrial use only. Housing no as they are outwith the village, creating new satellite accommodation detached from the village proper.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
within reasonable time
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Option A for the simple reason it will be based on what is in everyone's interests. Anyone putting a site forward is doing so from monetary reasons or for their own agenda for themselves.....the views of the village and the good of the community don't figure. At least the Council will make their allocations based on the good of the community as a whole and not in the interests of individual profit or aggrandisement.
