5 responses from Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual)
1. Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual) : 21 Aug 2011 23:56:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN142
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I feel this would greatly impact on the look of the village. Any one on the A590 passing the village would see any development here. This is a view of the village which includes some of the original houses rather then the newer properties in Levens and as such should remain unspoilt.
This field is the largest in Westmorland and it would be a shame to loose it.
Also there are footpaths running through this field which are greatly used and if developed would be a lose to the village.
From a builders point of view, the road noise here would impact on the prices of the houses and there are better locations which as per the Levens Residents Group the villagers are in agreement to having developed - this is inkeeping with the localism bill.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I'm not sure how this would affect us. However whatever decission is made I still feel that the figures are way too high and the only people to gain here will be the builders!
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I feel that the villagers should be able to have a view on this as per the localism bill. However I think that this should be the same for all the villages involved in the process!
2. Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual) : 22 Aug 2011 00:03:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN282
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I feel this on a whole is too large a site for the size of the village. However it would impact on the residents of the village less than the other sites suggested and due to the trees in this area it would be less on display than some of the other locations.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Villagers should have a say what happens in their villages!
3. Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual) : 22 Aug 2011 00:05:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN291
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This would be on view to the whole village and the view acrossfrom the village to Whitbarrow and surrounding areas would be lost to all the villagers. \There are better locations than this.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
4. Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual) : 22 Aug 2011 00:17:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN123
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Wholly support this site. It is an eyesore in the village and definately needs sorting out. It is a site large enough to make good size housing and should be looked into under the Empty Homes policy.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
5. Mr and Mrs K Monks (Individual) : 1 Sep 2011 09:22:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R105
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Access for this site is passed the school and will impact on a junction that is already very busy at school times.
