7 responses from Mr Michael Dyer (Individual)
1. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:03:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN127
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Seems obvious extension to village for a small development. Inadequate resources eg.electricity supply/broadband/water etc. which are already overstretched still an issue.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The original period seemed perfectly satisfactory when agreed and in my view this should be seen through rather than changing the goalposts at every opportunity which only causes confusion and suspicion of ulterior motives.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I see no reason why all should not come under the same principles because all villages whether large or small should have the right to suggest sites just as the Levens Residents Assn. are doing.
2. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:25:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN142
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The selling of a product or idea entails identifying a need, and demonstrating the benefits/features of that product or idea. This particular site is 6.22ha, room for over 180 houses which is far in excess of the needs of Levens Village. The needs of the Village are clearly set out in the Village Plan and it is my view that this document should be used as a guide. This field is an apron of the Village when viewed from the A590 with original 18th century limestone cottages seen. The footpaths through the field are extensively used. There are more appropriate sites suitable for the small amount of housing needed in Levens.Other basic issues involve the effect of increased traffic, inadequate resources eg.electricity supply/broadband/water etc which are already overstretched.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The original period seemed perfectly satisfactory when agreed and in my view this should be seen through rather than change the goalposts at every opportunity which only causes confusion and suspicion of ulterior motives.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I see no reason why all should not come under the same principles because all villages whether large or small should have the right to suggest sites just as the Levens Residents Assn. are doing.
3. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:29:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN123
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
An Eyesore in Levens Village and could provide 3/4 smaal cottages for existing residents to move into making larger property available.
4. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:30:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN45
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Development acceptable depending on the type of light industry.
5. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:34:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN282 and RN295
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Having looked at the physical position of these sites they would appear to be fairly unobtrusive to existing residents but there is still thehuge problem of access and of course utilities which are already overstretched.
6. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 13:39:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R291
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Housing on this site is just not acceptable. It is an amenity/feature of Levens Village seen by by visiters and residents alike using that ruote in/out. The road is single file and again the resources to accommodate such housing is just not available.
7. Mr Michael Dyer (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 14:39:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN105
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Seems obvious extension to village but would have detrimental effect on traffic through centre of village and through Greengate. There are more appropriate sites suitable for the small amount of housing neede in Levens. Other basic issues apart from the effects of increased traffic - inadequate resources eg. electricity supply/broadband/water etc. which are already overstretched.
Site only practical if solutions found to these issues.
