Response from Mr Ken Simm (Individual)
1. Mr Ken Simm (Individual) : 8 Sep 2011 10:34:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal SW
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E4M
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Original proposal of office and general industrial development was completely unacceptable. The alternative of housing is just an example of a developer trying to take advantage of an opportunity to gain support hoping that the general public will see this as the lesser of two evils. The land should remain undeveloped.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
