Response from Mrs Dorothy Pass (Individual)
1. Mrs Dorothy Pass (Individual) : 11 Aug 2011 13:04:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN315#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The author of the Story Homes submission seems to have ignored the reasons given in the Fact File document for restricting the original R109 option to the Emerging Option RN109M for the simple reason that RN109M provides sufficient space for the number of houses thought to be required. “Development on this scale would be inappropriate in the context of the Core Strategy…..”.
Story Homes is a Carlisle based builder who would no doubt love to become established in the south of the county but who might not be satisfied with the potential offered by RN109M. Hence, the cynical attempt to increase the size of the cherry.
There has been a mass of objections to RN109M and they all apply equally to this latest proposal i.e. RN315#
The best options have been identified repeatedly and they should be adopted as Emerging Options instead of the sites to the west of the A590. A mistake has been made and now is the time to correct it.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
To give the localisation bill to take over.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The existing arrangements were fine...we don't need the LA process.
