Response from Dr Lisa Norton (Individual)
1. Dr Lisa Norton (Individual) : 24 Aug 2011 15:13:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN302,ON50, R17
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
RN302 and ON50 should have nothing to do with building companies and have been put forward in part to provide compensation for destruction of adjacent habitat of landscape value in areas poorly sited in terms of impact on traffic entering Kendal and impacts on water flow in areas R121 and R56.
R17 I have already objected to, but would like to add that the creation of 3 houses (which are unlikely to be inexpensive) therefore providing little ease to housing problems in Kendal, are not worth the sacrifice of a valuable ecological habitat with high social value.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Things may change in the shorter term and it may be realised for example, that the demand for housing is not as anticipated.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Local people know best what is needed and where it may be appropriate to develop
