4 responses from Mr Peter Stephens (Individual)
1. Mr Peter Stephens (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 14:15:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
MN32#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This is a brownfield site and could easily accomodate the 15 or so affordable homes the village needs (if indeed they are needed). Additionally there is sufficient space for railway car parking.
This will mean no greenfield sites need to be developed in the village.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
There are over 70 homes currently for sale in Arnside, many have been on the market for some time.
Why the rush to build new houses when so many are available.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
We have a shortage of open space as it is, why concrete over more. Scattering development will only add to the carbon footprint.
2. Mr Peter Stephens (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 14:18:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN337#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This is a greenfield site and we have sufficient brownfield sites in the village to accommodate affordable housing requirements.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
There are over 70 homes currently for sale in Arnside, many have been on the market for some time.
Why the rush to build new houses when so many are available?
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
We have a shortage of open space as it is, why concrete over more. Scattering development will only add to the carbon footprint.
3. Mr Peter Stephens (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 14:22:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN269#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This is a brownfield site which should be developed before greenfield.
This will mean no greenfield sites need to be developed in the village, which is in an AONB.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
There are over 70 homes currently for sale in Arnside, many have been on the market for some time.
Why the rush to build new houses when so many are available.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
We have a shortage of open space as it is, why concrete over more. Scattering development will only add to the carbon footprint.
4. Mr Peter Stephens (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 14:27:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN267#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This is a pleasant small area filled with trees which breaks up the ribbon development along Redhills Road, The site could take a pair of semi-detached dwellings to fit in with others in the immediate vicinity. However, Redhills Road already is very busy with traffic and any substantial development will add to the problems at the Redhills Road/ Silverdale Road junction.
Are services available on this site?
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
There are over 70 homes currently for sale in Arnside, many have been on the market for some time.
Why the rush to build new houses when so many are available?
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
We have a shortage of open space as it is, why concrete over more? Scattering development will only add to the carbon footprint.
