Response from Mr Barry Postlethwaite (Individual)
1. Mr Barry Postlethwaite (Individual) : 6 Sep 2011 12:24:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
KIRKBY-IN-FURNESS
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN330# EN58# RN13#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
RN330# No Access to these fields without granting the fields already marked in Red( R189M ) These fields( R189M) have been refused planning previously, as I'm sure you know, as the campaign must be very well documented.
EN58# There are enough Industrial Units standing empty in the Furness area , plus access into any units on this site would bring traffic out on the already dangerous Four lane ends junction on the A590.
RN13# The road to this site is narrow, has many parked vehicles making Access difficult.Off road residents parking and parking of patrons using the Beckside rooms causes vitual gridlock at certain times. I do not see this land as suitable.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Local Parish councils/ Housing groups are more in touch with Village needs than County/District Councils .
