5 responses from Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual)
1. Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 15:50:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN282#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Positive: Suitable for development 'along' the hillside, in keeping with the village.
Negative: Access to the site could be difficult. It's a long way from the school, suggesting an increase in traffic on Cinderbarrow hill and/or Brigsteer Road.
I support this site 30%.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I would rather have a fairly settled longer term plan.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
It's better to have an overall view for the District.
2. Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 15:58:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN291#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Positive: This site is close to the village centre, shop, school, bus stop.
Negative: I feel that 70 houses added on one site is too many to be absorbed easily into a village of less than 500 homes. I would be happy with 25 houses.
The proposal mentions a proposed new route through from Brigsteer Road to Hutton Lane. I think security of any housing would be better served by having an enclosed estate. I believe Police recommendations are not to have roads or paths 'through' housing as this facilitates thefts.
My support for this site is 70%.
3. Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 16:24:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R142
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Positive: Site is convenient for access, school, church, bus stop, etc.
Negative: I would not want to have a large development. 25 houses would be about the most that could be absorbed into a village of this size (less than 500 homes).
I support this site 80%
4. Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 16:26:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R105#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Village has already expanded enough in this direction.
5. Mrs Elaine Hodkinson (Individual) : 9 Sep 2011 16:32:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Levens
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN45#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I support (90%) this site for business, subject to the following comment.
This land has access from/to the lane that is a designated National Cycleway [20]. As such it is well used by locals and visitors for both walking and cycling. Any increase in traffic would be detrimental and could be dangerous.
