2 responses from Mr Robert Boyd (Individual)
1. Mr Robert Boyd (Individual) : 2 Sep 2011 14:42:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
kendal NW
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E48
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Quarry basin abuts National Park and since it is no longer been used as a working quarry it is now overgrown with trees and shrubs becoming a haven for wildlife. The site is very deep and flooded , making it expensive and unsuitable for development.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
2. Mr Robert Boyd (Individual) : 2 Sep 2011 15:05:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
kendal SW
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R143,RN254,RN297
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
RN 254 and RN 297 are both unsuitable for housing development as building will be over the Blind Beck watercourse, which could cause potential flooding problems if R129 is developed. In addition, a rat run from Brigsteer road to Underbarrow road is likely to occur with people trying to access the bypass at Boundary Bank.
With regard to R143 which would extend R129 to the Bypass, if this is developed it will increase the number of cars accessing the Underbarrow road ,which is totally unsuitable for such traffic. The site is also intrusive on the landscape when viewed from the Racecourse and Scar.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
