Response from Mr David Judson (Individual)
1. Mr David Judson (Individual) : 29 Jul 2011 22:46:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal Quarry
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN48#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I can not see the logic in trying to develop the quarry basin. It is already flooded and would need major works for access and to supply all the services needed.
Much better to leave it to age naturally and support wildlfe that already exists there. There are many other more sutable sites for the type of delelopment suggested.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Whilst a long term plan is a good thing, too long is not neccessarily so.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
