2 responses from Mr Stephen Lennie (Individual)
1. Mr Stephen Lennie (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 10:22:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
EN59, M41M, RN239, RN255, EN33
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Further to the Endmoor Village Open Meeting on Monday 14th May 2011, called in the name of Preston Richard Parish Council and extracted from the minutes of that meeting :"The villagers are strongly in support of the preservation of open space north of the School. The Development Framework identified the need for more green space & traffic-free path/cycle ways. We fully agree, and have ideas to discuss with the Planners on how a network of links could help".
It was agreed that the large attendance fairly represented the views of the community. Of those present, only the meeting organiser and one other were in support of any developing North of the School, other than adjacent to the A65 north of Sycamore.
The areas do offer a strong amenity value which many villagers wish to access these areas for cycle and walk ways.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The extended process and all considerations to date have been based on the period to 2025. To change at such a late stage would undermine and invalidate the work so far and in order to reflect the community views fairly would necessitate beginning the process over again.
The fact that consideration of changing the time scale at such an advanced stage itself raises concerns as to the soundness of the review.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Provided that the Land Allocation process is communicated clearly and directly to the communities provides a controlled structure around which people can make life decisions.
Option "B" would be constantly divisive, splitting communities and more susceptible to abuse by purely commercially driven proposals, contrary to the interests of the community at large.
2. Mr Stephen Lennie (Individual) : 5 Sep 2011 10:36:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R83
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Least adverse visual impact on village, existing drainage network infrastructure and proximity to sewage facility. Least disruptive of all sites proposed.
Requires careful though re access and traffic management.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Oppose
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
