3 responses from Dr Simon Kaye (Individual)
1. Dr Simon Kaye (Individual) : 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kirkby Lonsdale
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN331#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I believe that this is the most logical place for expansion.
Vehicle access is best of any proposal.
Easy pedestrian access to all town services - including GP surgery( at which I am a doctor)
Already existing settlements south of A65 at Robraine and Biggins - this just continues this.
Any visual impact on passing traffic could easily be screened and "The Big Shed" that is QES sports centre is hardly a thing of beauty enhancing the A65 anyway!
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
No need to accelerate and current financial climate precludes much early development.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
2. Dr Simon Kaye (Individual) : 10 Aug 2011 00:04:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kirkby Lonsdale
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
R146#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support in part
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
Logical to extend development this way as a second priority if needed in addition to R331# - though vehicle access and also town pedestrian access much less easy than R331#.
However already existing property in this area and extending this way makes sense.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
3. Dr Simon Kaye (Individual) : 10 Aug 2011 00:12:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kirkby Lonsdale
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
RN317#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Support
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
this development fits well within existing developments and makes use of the redundant site of the school. There is already established access.
anything that reduces the liklehood of development to the west of town and which therefore avoids the extra traffic that would result on the Kendal Old Road and up Hop House Lane- which is an accident waiting to happen again - is to be supported. Any development increasing traffic on the Kendal Old Road must be avoided - it is narrow, dangerous and unfit for the existing levels of traffic - and the communicating section to the A65 is even worse with 2 blind bends that are not wide enough for 2 vehicles.
the school site is ideal for access to all the existing community services - unlike proposed developments to the west of town.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
Support
