Response from Dr Roger Crawley (Individual)
1. Dr Roger Crawley (Individual) : 10 Aug 2011 14:59:00
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E31# (6.21) and E4M# (18)
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
My previous comments dated March 2011 regarding these two sites apply equally to the Alternative allocations. E31M is not an appropriate choice for employment, housing, or use as football stadium. E4M is not appropriate for either employment or housing.
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
The Land Allocations process is already underway and should not be interrupted.
