Response from Mr Paul Latham (Individual)
1. Mr Paul Latham (Individual) : 26 Aug 2011 20:44:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E31# E31M# E4M#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
E31# E31M# have both been considered in great detail and dismissed nothing has changed that now makes these sites suitable for the uses suggested
There is no need for a football stadium/leisure facilities on this site being adequately catered for elsewhere probably little chance of finance this
development at all on this site would diminish the landscape setting of Kendal and open development would mean Kendal eventually joining with Natland The owner of the land is a contracting business who has reduced the workforce and interest in Kendal, they appears to be motivated in this development for financial reason
There is no housing nearby site M4M surrounded by housing is a more suitable choice
E4M#
this is unspoilt woodland that should be left for furture generations
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
local communities should be involved, but , developers need to be contriolled and often have no long term intrest
