2 responses from Mr and Mrs Eric and Judith Eland (Individual)
1. Mr and Mrs Eric and Judith Eland (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 08:39:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
Kendal sw
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
E4M#
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
1 Disturbance to wild life including birds (Lapwings) & native crayfish found in the stream running into the Kent
2 Ruin the current beautiful visual approach into Kendal from the south.
3 Increase in traffic will make it horrendous to exit onto Milnthorpe Road from existing housing. It is already extremely difficult to exit onto road, any increase in traffic will make it impossible.
4No infrastructure in place for drains etc. Already problems with drains & sewers following the building of the Travel Lodge
5Any building here will lead to a fall in the value of housing in the locality.Low cost high density housing is completely out of character for the Stonecross area of Kendal
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option B - Communities and/or developers bringing forward sites for housing and employment for consideration under relevant Core Strategy policies, through neighbourhood plans and/or other local initiatives
2. Mr and Mrs Eric and Judith Eland (Individual) : 8 Aug 2011 08:50:00
Settlement (e.g., Natland)
A590 corridor & M6 junction
Site reference number (e.g., RN298#)
A590 corridor & m6 junction mixed residential/employment
Please indicate below whether you support, support in part or oppose the suggestion that this site be included in the Land Allocations document.
Oppose
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
This option has no proposer & is extremely vague.The approach from the M6 is beautiful unspoilt countryside that is an incentive for tourists.If it is turned into a long industrial estate it will ruin the approach to the best asset that South Lakeland has to offer.Tourists will just keep going to Scotland 1 hour up the motorway. Surely it is better to look at existing sites & work to make these more efficient e.g.d the new site for the auction mart.
Please indicate whether you support, support in part or oppose a reduction in the time span of the Land Allocations document
No view
Please indicate which of the options for the future housing and employment land needs of small villages, hamlets and open countryside you would support.
Option A - Allocating sites for houses and employment in the Land Allocations document
Please explain your reasons/add your comments below
I think local communities should be involved, however, there should be some overall guidance to keep developers in check who may not have the interests of the local community at heart
