4 responses from Mr & Mrs A & Lynda Teasdale (Individual)
1. Mr & Mrs A & Lynda Teasdale (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 18:22:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
We are not happy that there are going to be houses built in the fields at the top of Kendal Parks. We have lived at the top of Kendal Parks Road for 40 years this year and have always found it very quiet. If these houses are built there would be more traffic on the estate and going past our house causing noise and disturbance and there would be more children/youths wandering around wondering how to entertain themselves, and undoubtedly getting up to no good.
Also, MOST IMPORTANTLY, there is not the employment in Kendal to justify building more properties.
All in all we think it is totally UNNECESSARY, UNREASONABLE and absolutely UNBELIEVABLE that anyone would think that Kendal needs more housing.
Also the site is right against the railway line and on a sloping site.
2. Mr & Mrs A & Lynda Teasdale (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 18:26:00
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R117?
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
We are not happy that there are going to be houses built in the fields at the top of Kendal Parks. We have lived at the top of Kendal Parks Road for 40 years this year and have always found it very quiet. If these houses are built there would be more traffic on the estate and going past our house causing noise and disturbance and there would be more children/youths wandering around wondering how to entertain themselves, and undoubtedly getting up to no good.
Also, MOST IMPORTANTLY, there is not the employment in Kendal to justify building more properties.
All in all we think it is totally UNNECESSARY, UNREASONABLE and absolutely UNBELIEVABLE that anyone would think that Kendal needs more housing.
Also the site is right against the railway line and also sloping very steeply.
3. Mr & Mrs A & Lynda Teasdale (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 18:32:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
We are not happy that there are going to be houses built in the fields at the top of Kendal Parks. We have lived at the top of Kendal Parks Road for 40 years this year and have always found it very quiet. If these houses are built there would be more traffic on the estate and going past our house causing noise and disturbance and there would be more children/youths wandering around wondering how to entertain themselves, and undoubtedly getting up to no good.
Also, MOST IMPORTANTLY, there is not the employment in Kendal to justify building more properties.
All in all we think it is totally UNNECESSARY, UNREASONABLE and absolutely UNBELIEVABLE that anyone would think that Kendal needs more housing.
Also the site is right against the railway line and on a very sloping site.
4. Mr & Mrs A & Lynda Teasdale (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 14:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
