2 responses from Mr Alan Jones (Individual)
1. Mr Alan Jones (Individual) : 7 Mar 2011 09:52:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R21, R69
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Alternative site to R21 and R69
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Other (as specified above)
No view
Please explain your reasons
The 2 sites R21 and R69, if developed would adversely affect the landscape especially if viewed from the north or east. Moreover there is no need to extend the village to the north when there is vacant and suitable land nearer to the village core and in a position where landscape intrusion would have a much lighter impact.
Notes on the map that has been provided
The 2 sites R21 and R69, if developed would adversely affect the landscape especially if viewed from the north or east. A less intrusive area for development would be land immediately south of Quarry Lane in Allithwaite which is also nearer to the core of the village.
2. Mr Alan Jones (Individual) : 7 Mar 2011 10:22:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Other (as specified above)
No view
Please explain your reasons
MN25M is a huge area which, if developed would change forever the ambience of Kents Bank. Moreover it contains wooded parts used by wildlife which would be isolated or destroyed depending on the development detail. The scale of this proposed site is too much for the area. Employment/light industry is not appropriate in this area which is residential. There are other sites where employment and light industry would better fit e.g the old airfield area of Flookburgh. White vans and associated traffic movement associated with light industry would be seriously detrimental to this residential area. The employment aspect of the proposal should be dropped and the scale of the residential development scaled back.
