4649 responses.
1. The Occupier (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
2. The Occupier (Individual) : 17 May 2011 14:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
3. The Occupier (Individual) : 17 May 2011 15:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
4. The Occupier (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
5. The Occupier (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
6. The Occupier (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
7. The Occupier (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
8. The Occupier (Individual) : 19 May 2011 10:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
9. The Occupier (Individual) : 19 May 2011 13:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
10. The Occupier (Individual) : 19 May 2011 13:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
11. The Occupier (Individual) : 19 May 2011 14:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
12. The Occupier (Individual) : 20 May 2011 09:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
13. The Occupier (Individual) : 20 May 2011 11:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
14. The Occupier (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
15. The Occupier (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Headless Cross
16. (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
17. The Occupier (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
18. The Occupier (Individual) : 23 May 2011 15:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
Housing
Oppose
19. The Occupier (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
20. The Occupier (Individual) : 25 May 2011 11:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
21. The Occupier (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 09:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
22. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
23. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
24. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
25. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
26. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
27. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
28. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
29. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
30. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
31. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
32. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 14:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
33. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
34. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
35. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
36. The Occupier (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
37. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
38. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
39. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
40. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
41. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
42. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Headless Cross
43. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Headless Cross
44. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
45. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
46. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
47. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
48. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
49. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
50. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
51. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
52. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
53. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 13:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
54. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 13:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
55. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
56. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
57. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
58. The Occupier (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
59. The Occupier (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
60. The Occupier (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
61. The Occupier (Individual) : 13 Jun 2011 09:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Allithwaite
62. The Occupier (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 07:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
63. The Occupier (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 07:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
64. The Occupier (Individual) : 19 May 2011 15:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
65. Mr Derek Abba (Individual) : 28 Mar 2011 13:37:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Support in part
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Right, let's look at the facts.
Fact 1:- The north area of the field floods after heavy rain creating a large pond. I have photos available.
Fact 2:- There are wooden poled pylons carrying extra high voltage lines crossing the site, not telegraph poles (which carry telephone lines) as stated in the site visit.
Fact 3:- The three narrow cul-de-sacs are really not suitable for extra traffic.
Fact 4:-Is Valley Drive, and its side roads, already the road with the most number of house on it in Kendal? resulting in a large volume of traffic, both accessing the dwellings and as a through route to avoid the main streets of Kendal.Do we really want more?
Fact 5:- We were the first to buy a plot of land on Valley Drive in 1975. We chose this site very carefully because it was flat, southern aspect at the rear and most importantly at the end of a cul-de-sac adjacent to what was then known as 'Green Belt' and shown on our sales document, which I still have from Russell Armer, as Public Open Space.
Fact 6:-Yes we are all protesting because we don't want to lose our 'view', we know we have no 'right' to a view, but do we want to lose this amenity which is enjoyed by many people, not just adjacent properties?
Yes we know facts 1 to 3 can be overcome by various means but we hope you will give all the facts serious consideration when deciding the future of RN117M!
66. Mr Dominic Abba (Individual) : 31 May 2011 12:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
67. Ms Helen Abbit (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 23:23:00
Settlement
Storth and Sandside
Map Number
13 Storth and Sandside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN22
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
We wish to object to the proposed allocation of land area RN22, an area of old orchard in Storth, as a site suitable for housing.
We feel that the terrain of this site makes it unsuitable for building. The land dips and rises over limestone outcrops with virtually no flat areas. The costs involved in developing such a site must surely be prohibitive, particularly when a proportion of any new houses must be 'affordable'. We are particularly concerned that the land which lies to the rear of the neighbouring properties, Heron Mount and Orchard View, rises steeply and any development of this area would completely overlook them and destroy the privacy and quality of life of the families living there.
The site has a great deal of wildlife value. The orchard has a thriving bird population, the different areas - the scrub,ivy and brambles as well as the grassy spaces and the fruit trees themselves - providing a good range of food and cover for many species. Rabbits and other small mammals are common, deer are accassional visitors. Bats are active during the summer months, as are slow worms.
The orchard is a vital green space in helping to create the character of Storth as a village and not just a seies of housing developments. It is part of a green ribbon running through the heart of the village linking the woodland flanking the quarry through the playing field and school grounds to the woods and meadow bordering the estuary.
This remnant of an old Westmorland orchard is a valuable and beautiful part of the AONB and should be protected and reinvigorated and most certainly not built over.
68. Mr and Mrs B Abbots (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
69. Mr and Mrs B Abbots (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
70. Mr Brian Abbott (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 08:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
71. Mr/s J Abernethy (Individual) : 4 May 2011 09:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
72. Ms Barbara Abeysuriya (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 14:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
73. Ms Sue Adams (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 16:02:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (2 of 4) Grange North
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
We object to the inclusion of plot RN34 (land at Grange Fell Road) in the proposals for residential development.
We are particularly concerned about:
1 This site appears to be ‘ribbon’ development, thereby extending the boundary of the built up area, rather than ‘infill’, a criteria many other sites fulfil.
2 The effect of storm water run off from a developed site. This might exacerbate flooding in surrounding areas.Past heavy rain has shown this to be a significant concern.
3 The site forms an attractive green 'gateway' into and out of Grange and has significant aesthetic benefit to both visitors and local residents, many of whom have small gardens.It is also an important area for wildlife.
4 Traffic in the area would certainly increase and add to the problems of navigating Grange Fell Road which is not the easiest even at present levels.
We believe you have identified more realistic development sites in Grange that would meet the targets you have set.
Therefore we ask that you reconsider this site and exclude it from your final proposals.
Yours faithfully.
R C Hall and SP Adams
74. Mr Anthony Roy Adams (Individual) : 2 Apr 2011 17:35:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M, E33, SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Increase in traffic on such a narrow approach road noisy and dangerous. Water runoff may make existing flooding problems in Brigsteer Road worse. Wish to protect the rural environment : Field R129M is bat habitat and is used by many birds for feeding,- curlew, tawny owls, peregrine falcons etc. Plant species present there are indicative of wet meadowland. The sites are near a recent landfill site. I wish to preserve the rural approach from the National Park to the town. Building would spoil the character and privacy of existing homes on this edge of Kendal.
75. Mrs Glynis Adams (Individual) : 2 Apr 2011 17:48:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M, E33, SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Increase in traffic on narrow road will be dangerous and noisy. Water runoff may add to flooding problems in Brigsteer Road. The fields listed are a corridoor for wildlife including bats and owls. There is a recent landfill site which makes nearby habitation undesirable. Development would spoil character of rural approach to Kendal from the National Park and the privacy of existing homes.
76. Mrs Rita Adams (Individual) : 12 May 2011 13:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
77. Mrs Rita Adams (Individual) : 19 May 2011 17:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
78. Dr Henry Adams (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 09:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M R150 R120 ON1 M2M R120 RN133M R107M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Open space
Support
79. Dr Henry Adams (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
80. Mr/s C Adams (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 16:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
81. Ms Sharon Addison (Individual) : 19 May 2011 10:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
82. Mr D. I. Aikman (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M R170 R148 R149 R513
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
83. Mr D. I. Aikman (Individual) : 23 May 2011 16:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
84. Mr D. I. Aikman (Individual) : 25 May 2011 14:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
85. Mr D. I. Aikman (Individual) : 15 Jun 2011 10:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
86. Mr Tim Ainscow (Individual) : 16 May 2011 15:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
87. Mr and Mrs Tony and Sally Ainsworth (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
88. Mr and Mrs Tony and Sally Ainsworth (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
89. Mr and Mrs Colin and Val Airey (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
90. Mr Michael Airey (Individual) : 23 May 2011 15:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
Housing
Oppose
91. Ms Angela Airey (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
92. Mr Frank Airey (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
93. Mrs Airey (Individual) : 24 May 2011 17:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
94. Mr and Mrs P.G. & Gail Airey (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN230
Housing
Oppose
95. Mr Laurence Airey (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
96. Mr David Airey (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 09:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
97. Mr and Mrs JS Airey (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 15:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
98. Ms Karen Airey (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
99. Mrs Mavis Aitchison (Individual) : 17 May 2011 14:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E33 R129M SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
100. Mr /s A Akinson (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 17:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
101. Mr Maurice Akroyd (Individual) : 25 Mar 2011 15:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
102. Mr and Mrs P. Alaimio (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
103. Mrs Sheila Alcock (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 15:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN118M R168E
Housing
Oppose
104. Mr J Alcock (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 15:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Housing
Oppose
105. Mrs Vera Alderson (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 10:56:00
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Map Number
23 Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E15M andR14
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
We request that SLDC reconsider site E15 instead of site E15M for the redesignation of land use for possible commercial development. This would result in a linear commercial site along Princes Way and have far less impact on some of the oldest properties in the village that border site E15M.
We cannot agree with the Parish Council suggestion that site R14 is designated for housing development. This is a small piece of land between the two main village amenities, the bowling green and the village hall, on which stands a large beech tree that is the subject of a preservation order. We consider that SLDC have already identified far more suitable sites for possible housing development
106. Mr and Mrs Aldren (Individual) : 28 Apr 2011 07:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
Housing
Oppose
107. Mr Michael Aldridge (Individual) : 13 May 2011 10:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN19
Housing
Oppose
108. Mr /s M Aldridge (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
109. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 4 Apr 2011 21:11:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The proposed build of 120 houses will increase traffic volume on the A590 by approx. 200 vehicles which will inevitably increase pressure on an already busy junction.
There has been significant subsidence along the proposed site for the new build due to the number of mines which can be evidenced through support structures and subsidence in the local area.
The sewerage system is already under pressure.Sewerage from High Carley to Urswick Road is pumped twice a week.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Residential Care Home due to aging community.
110. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 4 Apr 2011 21:25:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R684SW
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Access around the Rufus Lane area, leading onto Kingsley Avenue, is already difficult due to the number of cars parked by existing residents. Access for the emergency services must be considered in an area which is already heavily used by residents.
The proposed build of 35 houses will increase traffic volume of traffic on the A590 by approx. 50 vehicles and will inevitably increase pressure on an already busy junction.
Kingsley Avenue was built only so far along due to the fall and drainage of the land.
111. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 21:30:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R686SW
Housing
Support
Employment
Support
Retail
Support
Community uses
Support
Open space
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
This site is the most suitable for Swarthmoor and would provide a similar number of houses as the proposed site RN109M but without any of the access problems with the A590.
The existing properties on Park Road already have restricted views due to a high wall so the development would not impact on this to any great extent. There is also a steep bank to the south east which would sheild the view from the Urswick Road properties.
This site would also mean that the residents would have access to the amenities of the village without having to cross the busy A590 and as far as the children go they will be able to access the school at Croftlands without affecting the junctions on the A590.
112. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 21:44:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
This site whilst expanding the village would mean that the village is divided by the A590. All the existing amenities are on the other side of the A590 and so this would create serious problems for people trying to access these amenities without resorting to the use of cars thus adding to the existing traffic problems with the A590.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Retail Shop and Residential Care Home
113. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 21:42:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
This site whilst expanding the village would mean that the village is divided by the A590. All the existing amenities are on the other side of the A590 and so this would create serious problems for people trying to access these amenities without resorting to the use of cars thus adding to the existing traffic problems with the A590.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Retail Shop and Residential Care Home
114. Mr Roger Aldus (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 14:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
115. Brenda Alexander (Individual) : 10 Mar 2011 13:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM
Housing
Support in part
116. Ms J Algar & Mr T Wilson (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
117. Dr and Mrs F H and L Ali (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 09:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
118. Mr /s C Allan (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
119. Mr Phillip Allder (Individual) : 4 Apr 2011 14:21:00
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M38M, SF110, M38
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I believe that Burneside cannot sustain further housing developement, particularly "affordable", without adversely effecting the character of this village that we've called "home" for 25 years.
The sewage system can't handle the housing we've got now. The myriad country lanes that link various rural communities will be destroyed by this ill advised development, while town centre properties continue to lie empty.
120. Dr Gillian Allder (Individual) : 4 Apr 2011 15:04:00
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M38M SF110 M38
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I wish to register my objection to the affordable housing plans being proferred for Burneside. Firstly, as I hope you are aware, field M38M is in trust to the WILLINK trust. This as I hope you are also aware states that if this field has any change of use it must be agreed by at least 70% of all the villagers. I am certain that you do not have anything like this level of agreement.
I would also like to point out that the road structures are certainly not up to the level of the traffic that this develpment would bring. We would lose our little village roads which are a part of the Burneside village, which is one reason why myself and many others live here. Also Burneside has had serious flooding in the last few years due to poor drainage. Obviously more housing would put further strain on the drainage and river systems which are already creaking. Also the sewage system could not possibly cope with any more burden, as it is not coping now. Ask the people on New Road in Burneside what happens when we have heavy rain, raw sewage comes bubbling out of the manholes.There are many empty town centre properties, surely it would be sense to fill these first before building any new properties?
I stress you think again about this development and urge you to check the legality specifically with reference to the Willink Trust.
121. Ms Patricia Allen (Individual) : 4 May 2011 14:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R62
Housing
Oppose
122. Mr and Mrs D and J Allen (Individual) : 17 May 2011 11:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46
123. Mr and Mrs JW Allen (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
124. Mr /s S Allen (Individual) : 23 May 2011 11:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
125. Mr /s B Allen (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
126. Mr/s R Allen (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
127. Mr /s R Allen (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
128. Mr and Mrs D and J Allen (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
129. Mr and Mrs D and J Allen (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
130. Mr Derek Allinson (Individual) : 5 May 2011 12:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
Housing
Oppose
131. Mr Chris Allonby (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 15:45:00
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN131M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Other (please specify)
Continuing use as farmland
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
The proposed land allocation at RN131M is detached from all other suggested areas and currently developed areas, and if developed would result in an unnecessary intrusion of the built environment into the open countryside. The proposed area has a development-restricting aqueduct running through it, which might result in further fragmentation of the available land should it be developed. The proposed area is almost a mile from the nearest amenities and residents would have no alternative but to use cars or public transport to access all services, including shops and schools. The proposed development would result in the loss of arable farmland. The case for additional housing in Ulverston to the extent that detached areas on the periphery of the town must be developed to meet employment needs, has not been made. Employment opportunities are currently declining in Ulverston and are likely to do so into the future.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Nothing major currently required, but any new developments should be wholly within the present built-up area, to pevent urban sprawl.
132. Mrs Marjorie Allonby (Individual) : 4 May 2011 14:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R211
Housing
Oppose
133. Mr Mark Allsopp (Individual) : 5 Apr 2011 12:22:00
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (1 of 5) Ulverston Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R242: R697M; R126M: R691ULV
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Too many houses being planned. The infrastructure cannot handle it. The land is prone to flooding at the least bit of rain. The schools will not be able to cope. UVHS is already over subscribed and class sizes far too big. Most of the schools in the area have been in special measures already and filling them up with more children and less teachers will be an absolute catastrophe and result in the schools failing all over again. If we cannot educate the children properly there will be nobody to run the country in the future. This sort of development has been turned down in the past as excessive so why try and do it now. The loss of farmland will be a disaster and not help the town at all.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
If you build the number of houses proposed then there will be no land left to build any community facilities on. Look at the problems already with trying to get childrens facilities on Central Drive in Ulverston. What is likely to change in the next 15 years, apart from a bloody great eyesore of an extension to Croftland Estate.
134. Mr/s P Alterman (Individual) : 27 May 2011 14:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
135. Mr Nigel Anderson (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 09:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Map Number
32 Cark & Flookburgh (with Ravenstown/Moor Lane)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN20M
Housing
Oppose
136. Mrs Mary Anderson (Individual) : 11 May 2011 14:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R156 R126M R242 R697M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
137. Mrs Mary Anderson (Individual) : 11 May 2011 15:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
138. Mrs Mary Anderson (Individual) : 20 May 2011 15:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M
Housing
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
139. Mr David Anderson (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Map Number
40 Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R29 R211 R204
140. Mrs Mary Anderson (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 11:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
141. Mrs Mary Anderson (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
142. Mr James Brian Andrew (Individual) : 27 Jan 2011 09:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R89
Housing
Oppose
143. Mr Gordon Andrew (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R455
Housing
Oppose
144. Mr Gordon Andrew (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R48
Housing
Oppose
145. Mr James Brian Andrew (Individual) : 13 May 2011 08:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R89
Housing
Oppose
146. Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Housing
Oppose
147. Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM E4M
Housing
Oppose
148. Mr and Mrs David and Emma Andrews (Individual) : 24 May 2011 09:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM M41K
Housing
Oppose
149. Ms Simona Antal-Griffiths (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 11:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
150. Mr Stephen Anthony (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
151. Mr & Mrs A & B Antony (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
152. Ms Michelle Aplin (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
153. Mr Stephen Appleby (Individual) : 24 Mar 2011 12:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
154. Mr & Mrs K Appleby (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 15:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
155. Mr and Mrs P M Apsey (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
156. Mrs Jean Archibald (Individual) : 27 Mar 2011 17:17:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
These fields form the boundary between Kendal Town and the countryside. To build on them will be an encroachment on land that is valuable to animal and bird life.
By building on these fields water will not drain as well as at present and on wet days water will cause flooding on the lower land on Brigsteer Road.
The landfill is only a few yards from this proposed development and building houses this close appears to be contrary to the 1999 EU directive on Landfills which has been adopted by the British Government.
Greenside is not suitable for heavy traffic and there is a 7.5 tonne weight limit. A nursery school exits onto Greenside which is a dangerous exit already and more traffic will increase this problem. I myself have had two near miss collisions recently with people exiting from the nursery school due to the poor visibility.
Traffic from the proposed housing development is bound to flow to the centre of Kendal either through Beast Banks or Gillinggate thereby further exacerbating the traffic congestion problems and high levels of exhaust fume pollution in Lowther Street.
Jean Archibald
157. Mrs Jean Archibald (Individual) : 27 Mar 2011 17:26:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E33
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I oppose this proposal because it is too near to the existing landfill (please refer to 1999 EU directive)and also too close to the `national park.
Traffic would increase down Greenside and would add to existing traffic congestion problems in the town centre. There is already a weight limit on Greenside for vehicles.
158. Mr. Giles Archibald (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 19:00:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M, E33, SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
With one exception, I support the Kendal Town Council submission on the LDF in relation to these sites. There are concerns in that submission that relate to traffic and water run-off. These are concerns that I share and that have been repeated in conversations by several residents of Greenside. I, and other residents, are particularly concerned with the implications for traffic in Greenside, Tenterfell, Beast Banks, Gillingate, and Lowther Street.
There are other reasons I consider these lands as having low potential suitability for development, and these have been described in other submissions. I would particularly reference the submission of Mrs Margot Harvey.
In this submission, I will focus on the proximity to a Landfill. ( This is my exception to the KTC report, that does not mention landfills)
The effect on human health of living close to a landfill has been the subject of much research. I would draw the Council's attention to the 2000 study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. I would also reference the EU directive on the subject, adopted by the UK Government. While I do not believe there is any current danger to Greenside residents, the land proposed for development is much nearer and in one case directly below the landfill.
I would also draw attention to planning application 2011/0219. ( This is for an open air construction near the landfill). There is a contamination report accompanying that application which describes three sources of contamination. The risks are rated as moderate to low, but it goes on to conclude that the risks associated with the building of the proposed structure are acceptable provided there are no enclosed spaces. Building in E33 and R129M would have enclosed spaces.
159. Ms Ruth Ardron (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
160. Ms Helen Arkwright (Individual) : 18 May 2011 16:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
161. Ms Colleen Armer (Individual) : 24 May 2011 14:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
162. Mr Nigel Armer (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 16:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
163. Mr Robert G Armistead (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 11:38:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R684SWM
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
1. I do not support this allocation because this side of the A590 is not an Ideal extension to the village community for the following reasons.
2. The only access both in and out of this site is along Kingsley Avenue and Rufus Lane. Rufus Lane junction with the A590 is very tight and can be very congested with parked vehicles on both sides of the road, (this restricts vehicles from passing) right up to the junction, so much so that emergency vehicles could struggle to get through.
3. During peak periods I personally have had to wait up to 5 min. at the junction waiting to turn right onto the A590, with vehicles queuing behind me, this can create a dangerous situation with no space for any vehicle wanting to access Rufus Lane from the A590.
4. These situations are real now, with the existing 12 houses - 23 vehicles on Kingsley Avenue and an additional 15 vehicles which are parked on Rufus Lane by householders from Ulverston Road etc. (vehicles park on both sides of the road allowing single line traffic only) - with the addition of another 35 houses and a possible 60+ vehicles this could create a very congested situation and another accident black spot.
5. Any further extension to Kingsley Avenue would be running downhill. The existing sewer flows in the opposite direction and at the lower end of the avenue (the end of the cul-de-sac) is close to the surface and would probably not accommodate any extension.
6. The access to village activities in most cases would mean having to cross the A590 which is not ideal from the safety angle. Bearing in mind this is the next busiest road to the M6 in Cumbria.
164. Mr Robert G Armistead (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 11:41:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN106
Housing
Support
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
1. I support this allocation because this land would be an extension to an existing development (Crow Tree Farm and Trinkeld Farm) which already has an access road in place.
2. It is in a good position for access to the road network, the A590 junctions can easily be avoided at the busiest periods.
3. Most village activities can be accessed easily without having to cross the A590.
165. Mr Robert G Armistead (Individual) : 6 Apr 2011 11:45:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R686SW
Housing
Support
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
1. I support this allocation because this is the by far the most suitable site and would be a natural extension to the village.
2. It is in a good position for access to the road network, the A590 junctions can easily be avoided at the busiest periods.
3. Most village activities can be accessed easily without having to cross the A590.
166. Mr & Mrs Robert and Anne Armistead (Individual) : 18 May 2011 10:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
167. Mr/s B Armistead (Individual) : 19 May 2011 10:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
168. Ms Ruth Armistead (Individual) : 19 May 2011 16:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
169. Mr Robert G Armistead (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 14:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
170. Mr and Mrs Steve and Sheelagh Armistead (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 16:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Pennington
Housing
Oppose
171. Mr and Mrs Steve and Sheelagh Armistead (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 16:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Pennington
Housing
Oppose
172. Mr & Mrs Jack & Margaret Armitage (Individual) : 24 Feb 2011 11:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R81
Housing
Oppose
173. Mr David Armstrong (Individual) : 16 May 2011 09:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R103
Housing
Oppose
174. Ms Edith Olive Armstrong (Individual) : 19 May 2011 11:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
175. Ms Edith Olive Armstrong (Individual) : 20 May 2011 14:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
176. Mr and Mrs A & R Armstrong (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
177. Mr and Mrs G & D Armstrong (Individual) : 25 May 2011 11:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
178. Mr and Mrs G & D Armstrong (Individual) : 25 May 2011 11:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
179. Mr /s G Armstrong (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
180. Ms Edith Olive Armstrong (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 15:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
181. Mr and Mrs Nigel and Susan Arnfield (Individual) : 26 May 2011 16:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
182. Mr and Mrs Nigel and Susan Arnfield (Individual) : 26 May 2011 16:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
183. Ms Vera Arnold (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 14:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R81 R693M
184. Mr and Mrs David and Julie Arnold (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
185. Mr and Mrs David and Julie Arnold (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
186. Mr /s S Arnold (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
187. Mr /s D Ashburn (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
188. Mr Peter Ashby (Individual) : 8 Feb 2011 21:05:00
Settlement
Bowston
Map Number
16 Bowston and Cowan Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664 and R664M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The site is only put forward at the behest of the landowner - presumably for pecuniary gain.
It has not been chosen as a result of any analysis as to where additional development could best take place in Bowston which would minimise visual harm.
There has not been any analysis that I am aware of which has assessed the level of need for additional housing in Bowston or other settlements of this size and therefore there is no justification for requiring the development of this particular site.
There appears to be no assessment as to the impact that windfall housing sites in the settlement would have on meeting any local needs. There is land within residential curtilages and an industrial site which has the potential to create nuisance given its proximity to adjacent dwellings which could provide additional housing within the existing settlement envelope.
If the housing sites in Burneside come forward it is not likely that additional housing land will be required in Bowston.
The site would by reason of being outside the envelope of the hamlet be visually intrusive and constitute ribbon development which has, I gather, been resisted successfully in the past.
All of the reasons for discounting the larger R664 site apply in equal measure to the smaller R664M site.
Given that the proposal is for just affordable housing there would be low economic returns which would likely result in a high density scheme with scarce resources for "quality" landscaping and materials which would make any development more out of keeping in this countryside setting.
Any housing land releases should be based on a sequential approach whereby sites are brought forward in settlements where there is greater infrastructure and community facilities rather than in locations which are less sustainable and where there is no identified local need.
In conclusion there is no justification for the release of the site which would outweigh the considerable visual harm which would result were the site to be developed.
189. Mr Peter Ashby (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 21:53:00
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E32M
Housing
No view
Employment
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
I am concerned about the visual impact and harm to the Dales Way route.
The proposal would only be acceptable if a substantial mounded wide landscaped strip were to be planted along the open countryside boundary to be planted BEFORE the commencement of other site works such strip to replicate that existing.
The opportunity should be taken to reroute the whole of the Dales Way link around Croppers such that it is on the outside of the planted strip.
Dark materials to be used for roofing and walls.
190. A Ashby (Individual) : 28 Apr 2011 07:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
191. Mr and Ms E and K Ashcroft (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
192. Mr Anthony Ashcroft (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
193. Mr/s D Ashdown (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
194. Mr Brian Ashley (Individual) : 27 May 2011 15:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
195. Mr Christie Ashmore (Individual) : 3 Mar 2011 15:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
196. Ms Rachel Ashton (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 16:56:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R685SW
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
Swarthmoor already has significant traffic issues. The area has many children and elderly people, the narrow lanes just cannot sustain any increase in traffic. Building on Park Road would constitute an encroachment into the village, filling up open green space bringing a conurbation that bit closer, limiting grazing for an organic farm and damaging the quality of life for villagers. Lastly, Park Road has a significant bat population which should not be threatened. It is unclear where they roost but they feed around the mature sycamores that line the road.
197. Mr/Mrs/s C Ashton (Individual) : 17 May 2011 07:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
198. Mr/Mrs/s C Ashton (Individual) : 17 May 2011 07:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Employment
Oppose
199. Ms Rebecca Ashurst (Individual) : 23 May 2011 09:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
200. Mrs S M Ashworth (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
201. Mr Chris J Askew (Individual) : 19 May 2011 11:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
202. Mr Chris J Askew (Individual) : 23 May 2011 09:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
203. Mr John Askew (Individual) : 31 May 2011 12:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
204. Mr Chris J Askew (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 16:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
205. Mr A Askins (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
High Biggins
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
206. Mr and Mrs David Aspden (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
207. Mr David Aspinwall (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
208. Ms Kym Astill (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
209. Ms Kathleen Atack (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
210. Mr Brian Athersmith (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (1 of 5) Ulverston Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM
211. Mr Brian Athersmith (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
212. Ms J Atherton (Individual) : 20 May 2011 15:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M
Housing
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
213. Ms J Atherton (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
214. Ms J Atherton (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 11:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
215. Mrs Eleanor Atkinson (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 14:00:00
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Map Number
23 Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R48M, RN118M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
• The number of new houses proposed for Heversham (99) represents an increase of approximately 35%. This is clearly far too much for one village.
• It is questionable whether there is a demand for so many houses in Heversham as the most recent survey identified a need for only 16 in the next five years and there are currently approximately 8 properties in the village on the market.
• Heversham does have a church, a small children’s playground, a hotel, a primary school and an infrequent bus service, but it has no shop, post-office, library, secondary school, doctor, dentist or bank. It is clearly not equipped to sustain such a large increase in population.
• An increase of 99 properties would bring about an increase in the number of children in the village, particularly if a proportion of the new properties are to be ‘low-cost’ housing as these are presumably aimed largely at young families. It is unlikely that Heversham Primary School could manage such an increase in numbers.
• The number of 99 new properties proposed for Heversham is much higher than the numbers proposed for other South Cumbrian villages of a similar size (some of which have more amenities to offer).
• Heversham is a quiet rural village with a high proportion of elderly residents. The increase in traffic brought about by a further 99 properties in the village (likely to be at least one car per household) would alter the character of the village and be a danger to children and elderly walkers alike, particularly around the church where there is no pavement and the road is narrow and windy. With the lack of facilities and work opportunities within the village the need to travel in and out of the village by car would be unavoidable.
Proposed Sites
• It is proposed that the majority of the new properties would be built on the plots identified as RN118 and R48M. These sites both border the Dugg Hill estate. Currently there are approximately 60 properties on Dugg Hill, so the proposed development would more than double the existing estate. Dugg Hill is already the largest development in Heversham, so such an increase would distort the balance of the population through the village and create an eyesore when the village is viewed from the surrounding area.
• I understand that access to the new properties would be via Dugg Hill. The road was built in the 1960’s and was designed for the traffic of that time, which would not generally have been more than one car per household. Today many of the households have more than one car and the road is often congested with parked vehicles. The road is narrow, being only just wide enough for two cars to pass comfortably. It is also windy and undulates, reducing visibility and making it harder for vehicles to pass each other.
• The estate has a rising number of young families with children playing near the road or riding bikes around the estate. Clearly a large increase in traffic through the estate would present considerable danger to young families living there (in either the existing or the proposed housing), as well as to the proportionally large number of elderly residents. In particular access to site R48 would require passage through the whole length of the existing road, which is clearly unacceptable.
• The site identified as RN118 has been considered for development in the past. Most recently in 1990, when the proposed housing development was turned down. Nothing has changed since then, so I cannot see why it would be appropriate now.
There is some potential for in-filling on several sites in Heversham, but I cannot see that the housing needs identified for the village require anything like the proposed scale of development. The residential roads in the village are unsuitable to take increased volumes of traffic, so any sizeable development would need to be accessed directly off the former A6. This would make site R39 a more suitable option than those currently proposed.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
If the village is to be developed as planned we would need improved roads in the village and to Milnthorpe, improved walkway to Milnthorpe, and a shop.
216. Mrs Annie Atkinson (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
217. J H Atkinson (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
218. Ms Isabel Atkinson (Individual) : 5 May 2011 13:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R670 R83M M41M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
219. Mr Derek Atkinson (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Crooklands
220. Mr Leo Atkinson (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R234
Housing
Support
221. Mr Roger Atkinson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
222. Mr Roger Atkinson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
223. Mr and Mrs Gordon and Sheila Atkinson (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R103 R675
Housing
Oppose
224. Mr Peter Atkinson (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
225. Ms Jeanette Atkinson (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
226. Mr /s K and D Atkinson (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
227. Mr /s K and D Atkinson (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
228. Mr Stewart Attwood (Individual) : 26 May 2011 16:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
229. Sir Christopher Audland (Individual) : 19 May 2011 15:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
M91M1 M9 M2 RN140 R462M R151M
230. Mr R Audsley (Individual) : 17 May 2011 15:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
231. Mr and Mrs David and Janet Austin (Individual) : 11 May 2011 11:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
232. Mr/Ms M.C. Avery (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
233. Mr/Ms M.C. Avery (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN121M RN121 EN10 EN11 RN123
Housing
Support
234. Ms Gloria Ayob (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 09:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
235. Mr/s N Ayre (Individual) : 17 May 2011 15:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
236. Mrs Christine Baalham (Individual) : 23 May 2011 15:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R697
237. Mrs Christine Baalham (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
238. Mr & Mrs S Baber (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 13:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Housing
Oppose
239. Mr and Mrs Michael and Anne Bagnall (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
240. G Baguley (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 14:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
241. Mr Claude Bailey (Individual) : 5 Jul 2011 14:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
new
242. Mr and Mrs David and Jean Bain (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 11:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
243. Mr and Mrs T & S Bainbridge (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 12:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
244. Mr and Mrs T & S Bainbridge (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
245. Mr and Mrs Keith and Caroline Bainbridge (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
246. Mr and Mrs Keith and Caroline Bainbridge (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
247. Mr /s N Bainbridge (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
248. Mr Brian Baines (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
249. Mr/s C Baines (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
250. Mr Paul Baker (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 12:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
251. Mr & Mrs Brian & P A Baker (Individual) : 18 May 2011 09:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R56 R121 R141
252. Ms Joan Baker (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
253. Mr Charles Baker (Individual) : 24 May 2011 09:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R682LV R682LVM
Housing
Support
254. Mr and Mrs David and Ann Baker (Individual) : 26 May 2011 16:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
255. Mr and Mrs David and Ann Baker (Individual) : 26 May 2011 16:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
256. Mr /s D Baker (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
257. Mr /s D Baker (Individual) : 13 Jun 2011 15:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
258. Mr and Mrs D.J. Balch (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
259. Mr/s DB Balchin (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
260. Mrs Lisa Baldwin (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 13:22:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (2 of 6) Kendal North West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
DEVELOPMENT WOULD HARM THE VISUAL AMENITY AND LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF KENDAL
This site falls outside the northern development boundary of Kendal. Development in this site will cause harm to visual amenity and landscape character of Kendal. The separation between the two neighbouring settlements of Burneside and Kendal will be eroded leading to loss of integrity of the green gap. The current boundary is locally distinctive and follows the existing historical field boundaries and contours of the landscape. It forms a well-defined edge to the town. Visually, the existing boundary blends well and forms part of an attractive gateway to Kendal. Expanding the housing estate into agricultural land will form a conspicuous and obtrusive northern boundary as well as forming a ribbon development of new houses. As it is, the edge of the town balances well with the agricultural land to the west of Windermere Road, rising up to the rugged landscape of Kendal Fell. Development of green space is contrary to emerging options in the SLDC Local Development Framework
DEVELOPMENT WOULD LEAD TO LOSS OF PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND
The land should not be developed for housing as it is heavily covenanted by the National Trust (Lane Foot Farm Covenant, 1944) and is adjacent to the National Park boundary. It would mean a loss of prime agricultural pasture land that is grazed all year. This helps to preserve the area as an important wildlife habitat for species such as curlew, lapwing and several species of bat.
THE SITE IS SUSCEPTIBLE TO FLOODING
Water pools extensively in a dry channel that runs through the site after periods of heavy rain (photos are available if required). There are also sustainable development issues with regard to drainage and run-off. Neighbours complain of existing problems with sewerage network and water backing up through drains. United Utilities have already expressed concern that the sewerage network is at capacity. In addition, increased runoff from a developed site will have detrimental effects on the River Kent Special Area of Conservation. Likely significant effects have already been identified in the “Appropriate Assessment Screening of South Lakeland District Council’s Allocations of Land DPD” document in December 2010.
ISSUES WITH PARKING AND TRAFFIC
Hallgarth is already a large, sprawling estate. There are daily issues with traffic flow and parking on the estate. Many houses do not have drives. Cars are currently parked on pavements, on blind bends and junctions. The estate roads are reduced to one lane in most places. More housing means, unsustainably, more cars.
ACCESS ISSUES
The Hallgarth estate suffers from poor access with only points of entry/exit from Windermere Road and Burneside Road. Both these junctions are very difficult to exit from. Significant access and junction improvements would be necessary but could create a ‘rat run’ for people not wanting to drive through town, as in effect a northern bypass.
NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION
More housing would cause increased noise and light pollution in what is currently a rural boundary. Unfortunately the estate is not without its social problems and we do experience anti-social behaviour, dog fouling, litter and noise. More housing would exacerbate these problems. It would be better to have green space and a recreational amenity that people could use and enjoy, safely.
SUGGESTIONS FOR USE
A more appropriate use of this space would be to continue with support for important grazing land or perhaps a horse livery. Another sustainable use would be for a ‘green’ community area such as a community orchard or allotments.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
It would be great to see some positive support for the people that already live on Hallgarth. We are currently seeing cuts to our services due to the Government spending review (hospital, police, fewer school places). Our community cannot expand and support the residential development proposed while these core services are being cut. The council should not propose to make the estate bigger, bringing in more houses, more people, more cars, without seeing improvements for the current local community first. We need green recreational space, play areas, community areas, improved traffic management, allocation of parking spaces, road markings re-painted, current traffic calming measures repaired, pot holes filled, improved access to services.
261. Mr Hugh Baldwin (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
262. Mr/s R Balmer (Individual) : 6 May 2011 15:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Housing
Oppose
263. Mrs Linda Bamber (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 16:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Pennington
Housing
Oppose
264. Miss Diane Banawich (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 20:43:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (3 of 6) Kendal North East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN169
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
The proposed development of this area is far too large. The original smaller development at R44 was far more appropriate. Why aren't empty properties being utilised first.
This is already a large, sprawling estate. There are daily issues with traffic flow and parking on the estate. Many houses do not have drives. Cars are currently parked on pavements, on blind bends and junctions, making it difficult as a driver and a pedestrian. The estate roads are reduced to one lane in most places. There are already issues with the state of the roads, ie potholes . More housing means more cars.
The estate suffers from poor access with only 2 ways in and out via Windermere Road and Burneside Road. Both these junctions are very difficult to exit from. Significant access and junction improvements would be necessary but could create a ‘rat run’ for people not wanting to drive through town.
United Utilities have already said that a large scale upgrade of the sewer network will be needed to accommodate the proposed housing development, causing major upheaval on the estate. There are already issues with flooding on the proposed site.
Any development on such a large scale will inevitably produce an adverse visual impact, but placed as it is, in an area of such outstanding visual amenity, the effects will be particularly intrusive. It is difficult to see how such a development could ever be effectively screened, lying as it does in open countryside, below the Southern approach to Kendal and prominantly visible from Windermere Road. The consequential visual effect of looking down on the roofs of the properties from Windermere Road, would in my opinion, be detrimental to and destroy, what is accepted by many, as one of the most beautiful and outstanding scenic approaches to the historic town of Kendal.
The area is crossed by public rights of way and is an important recreational, green space for local people.
More housing would cause increased noise and light pollution in what is currently a rural boundary. Unfortunately the estate is not without its social problems and we do experience anti-social behaviour, dog fouling, litter and noise. More housing would exacerbate these problems. It would be better to have green space and a recreational amenity that people could use and enjoy, safely which we have now.
Development would lead to loss of prime agricultural land:
The land should NOT be developed for housing as it is heavily covenanted by the National Trust (Lane Foot Farm Covenant, 1944) and is adjacent to the National Park boundary. It would mean a loss of prime agricultural pasture land that is grazed all year. This helps to preserve the area as an important wildlife habitat for species such as curlew, lapwing and several species of bat.
265. Mr and Mrs Christopher and Shirley Band (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
266. Mr and Mrs Christopher and Shirley Band (Individual) : 19 May 2011 12:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN122
267. Mrs Daphne Banks (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 11:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
268. Mr Stephen Banks (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 13:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
269. Mr /s Jody Banks (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
270. Ms Esther Banks (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
271. Dr. Nadeem Baqai (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 21:57:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I fully understand need for new houses; however I am very certain present infrastructure at Swarthmoor cannot cope with any further expansion. Pennington School will be logical place to send children for new residents who are going to live at proposed site in map 41 ref RN109M. My kids went to Pennington School. At present there is no more capacity at this school to accommodate any more children.
Furthermore I cannot see Swartmoor community centre can handle such increase in population. New 130 houses will offset delicate balance of this right size community, without mentioning effects on environment.
I am sure commonsense will prevail, and local authorities will resist pressure from developers. If need for new housing scheme is inevitable, I suggest any new development should be closer to bigger school where there is capacity to expand.
272. Mrs Maureen Barber (Individual) : 3 Mar 2011 14:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bardsea & Bardsea Green
Map Number
43 Bardsea & Bardsea Green
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN102
Housing
Oppose
273. Mr & Mrs John Barber (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 12:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
274. Mr & Mrs John Barber (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 12:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
275. Mr and Mrs Simon and Georgina Barber (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
276. Mr and Mrs Simon and Georgina Barber (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
277. Ms Janice Barber (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
278. Ms Janice Barber (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 15:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
279. Mr/s CL Barclay (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
280. Mr Harry Barden (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
281. Mr and Mrs Paul and Pamela Barker (Individual) : 8 Mar 2011 14:31:00
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Map Number
7 Burton in Kendal (with Clawthorpe)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN151/RN151M
Housing
Support
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
As owners since 1987 of the field designated as RN151 on the December 2010 “Sites under Consideration” map for Burton in Kendal, we noted with interest and surprise that it had been suggested as a site for Residential development. We were however astonished to then find, on Maps 7 and 27, that the northerly (and major) part of the field had subsequently been suggested for Employment development, under the designation RN151M.
We can understand and support the original suggestion for residential development of the field, as the need becomes apparent in due course. This would sit comfortably alongside the eight dwellings (including ours) which already form a “semi-hamlet” to the immediate south of the Holme Mills Industrial Estate. The development would increase the amount of traffic using the adjacent by-roads, but this would be mainly private domestic vehicles. However, a commercial/industrial complex located there would increase the number of larger vehicles using these roads, and mean that the eight dwellings would be hemmed in on either side by industrial complexes.
We and our neighbours are already seeing the growing problems caused as a result of the developments at Stoneleigh Park, and the situation will soon be further exacerbated when the Burtlands “warehouse” becomes operational, and we are dreading the further inevitable rise in commercial traffic as the warehouse facility slips into workshop mode. It is not merely the number of vehicles shuttling between Holme Mills, Stoneleigh Park, and soon Burtlands, but their size (including some very big “artics”). As they crowd into the verges to let each other through, or jostle their way past cowering cars, damage has already been done to the hydrants which control the water supply to our house and its neighbours, and to the safety mirror which provides some security to our neighbours’ cars as they turn out on to Station Road from the other dwellings. It is only a matter of time before damage is done to the wall which separates our field from the road, or to that on the other side belonging to Jolly’s Farm – both fields which regularly contain grazing animals.
The essential problem though is that the existing industrial sites, and any added in future, lie in a zone bounded to the east by the canal and to the west by the railway. This zone can only be accessed by vehicles passing through the centre of the villages of Holme and Burton, or from the A6 by passing under the railway at Burtlands. The horrendous state of the road surface at that point is a testament to the effect that such traffic is having in a less concentrated but no less dangerous form at so many other places between there and Holme Mills.
The only sensible course, to anyone seeing and understanding the wider picture, is for any further industrial/commercial development to take place west of the railway line, where the associated traffic can have direct, and preferably dedicated, access to and from the A6, the only road in the vicinity which is suitable for it.
We therefore urge that the site RN151/RN151M be considered for Residential development, as originally proposed in the Decenber 2010 "Sites under Consideration" document.
282. Mrs EL Barker (Individual) : 6 May 2011 14:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Housing
Oppose
283. Mr and Mrs David and Julie Barker (Individual) : 17 May 2011 07:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
284. Mrs Pam Barker (Individual) : 19 May 2011 12:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
285. Mr and Mrs W E Barker (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
286. Mrs Helen Barker (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 09:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cartmel
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R112 RN156M RN14
Housing
Oppose
287. Ms Katie Barker (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
288. D & S Barker (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
289. Mr and Mrs W E Barker (Individual) : 1 Jul 2011 14:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
Housing
Oppose
290. Mr Peter Barley (Individual) : 12 May 2011 09:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M4M R97M E31M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
291. MR DAVID BARLOW (Individual) : 3 Apr 2011 15:16:00
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R112
Housing
Oppose
Notes on the map that has been provided
I oppose the planned development at R112.
United Utilities do not support this development. It can not go ahead without their co-operation. Surely SLDC should accept this and discount this proposed development now.
During and after wet weather the drains in Haggs Lane fill up and water backs up out of them and flows on the surface and collects in deep puddles . This has resulted in Meeting House cottages having to be protected from flooding in the past and also makes driving conditions dangerous. Pedestrians are unable to easily walk down where there is no pavement and have to go through large puddles, often being soaked by speeding cars! How will the drains cope with all the extra rainwater from the proposed new development? They can't.
Is the main sewer pipe in Cartmel large enough to cope with this development? Has this been investigated with United Utilities?
The proposed access at the North East corner to this site is extremely dangerous. It is on a bend and vision would be poor. Traffic travelling out of Cartmel towards Grange will always be difficult to see and limited work could be carried out to improve this. Development on this site has been turned down by the planning department before because of this reason. Why is it safe now when there are more vehicles on the road?
Where will appropriate pavements go on Haggs Lane at the proposed access/junction to this site?
The field currently acts as a soak away for Hesketh wood. Because of the large amount of Limestone in the wood the water has to soak into the field, which is at a lower point. This results in the field being very wet and often water stands at it's North boundary. You can hear the horses walking about on very wet ground. If houses are built on this site the surface area available to soak away will be greatly reduced.
In Spring a large number of Toads travel across this field. The Council has a sign on Haggs Lane warning motorists of the Toads. Deer will bring their new fawns into the top of this field in summer and a whole aray of wildlife use it. This site is currently a beautiful green field site and when you view the map it is actually an extension of the village boundary. The original Core Strategy stipulated that new development should be concentric and development should be centre outwards and on brown field sites.
The Core stategy was "a product of the last goverments targets" Is it the law of the land and has SLDC got to adopt the scale of development it is currently proposing or can it be scaled back? Has this been a question asked recently?
Is there enough local jobs to satisfy this scale of development?
Because of the elevation of this site, houses would obscure the view of Hesketh wood from the southern outskirts of the village. It will spoil the character of the village and surrounding countryside.
292. Mr and Mrs Tim and Jill Barly (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
rn7
Housing
Oppose
293. Mr and Mrs Tim and Jill Barly (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
294. Mr Matthew Barnes (Individual) : 28 Apr 2011 23:04:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I have only recently been made aware of the proposed developments in the Grange South area.
Having visited and lived in the area for over 30 years, I believe that I have experience to pass informed comment on the proposals, particularly to site MN25M.
This area borders a wooded area to the East housing many species of wildlife and indeed the whole area is one of outstanding beauty. As such, I believe that this area should be protected from any development and certainly not on the scale planned in the proposals.
On the practical side, there is only one small post office in Kents Bank and as such, the local people all use Grange-over-Sands for their shopping and public service requirements. This already causes some issues in terms of transport and parking in Grange, which is currently not designed to cater for any more people than it presently services. An increase in the population on the scale proposed would have horrendous consequences in terms of transport, congestion and access to amenities generally.
Moreover, given that the area has been developed for affordable housing, it is to be assumed that some such potential residents would require the use of public transport which is currently not available at a level required to support them.
It is therefore clear that these plans have not been thought out either in terms of the environment or on a practical level in terms of transport and infrastructure and therefore I would strongly recommend that the proposals were declined.
295. Ms Stella Barnes (Individual) : 4 May 2011 14:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R29 R189
Housing
Oppose
296. Mrs C Barnes (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
297. Mr / Ms M.E. Barnes (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
298. Mr and Mrs A&S Barnes (Individual) : 18 May 2011 10:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
299. Mr and Ms J. and J. Barnes (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
300. Mr and Mrs Peter and Suzanne Barnes (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
301. Mr and Mrs Peter and Suzanne Barnes (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
302. Norman & F. Barnett (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 08:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R697M
Housing
Oppose
303. Norman & F. Barnett (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
304. Norman & F. Barnett (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
305. Mrs M Barnett (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
306. Mrs Jacqueline M Barnfield (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 14:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689 RN184 RN126M R691 R242 R697M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
307. Mrs Jacqueline M Barnfield (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
308. Mrs Jacqueline M Barnfield (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 13:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
309. Mr and Mrs David Baron (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
310. Mr R. David Barrett (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
311. Mr R. David Barrett (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
312. Mr and Mrs E Barrington (Individual) : 5 May 2011 13:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
313. Mr and Mrs John and Paula Barron (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
314. Mr and Mrs John and Paula Barron (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
315. Mr /s Chris Barron (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
316. Mr /s S Barron (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
317. Mrs Michelle Barrow (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 22:16:00
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109 AND R684SW
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
As a resident living near to the proposed sites I oppose the allocation because
1)This field slopes down considerably and poor drainage from the proposed field (RN 109)results in the rear of our garden and garage being flooded along with a rat problem and on several occasion blocked drains.
2)There is the probability the new housing will be attracting a migration of people into the area along with all the problems associated with a rapidly expanding population,adding to an already overcrowded,sprawling housing estate which adds nothing to the character of the area.
3)The creation of jobs will not benefit the local community only those who are employed to build the proposed houses.When built where are the jobs to come from to enable people to buy these houses in this unstable economy.
4)A large concern for any resident in this village is a busy and dangerous road.The a590 provides a thoroughfare for many a speeding motorist although a 40mph speed limit is in place.Trying to get onto the a590 from one of Swarthmoors junctions can take approx 10mins and the junction of Kingsley avenue(r684sw) is no exception.The junction of cross a moor suffers from traffic congestion most times of the day.I feel it would be a considerable danger to increase this congestion by using this to access the proposed development but a greater concern would be the traffic increase near to the primary and nursery schools.We have a great community where children can still be children and travel to school by bike or walk with friends.As a parent I would be more concerned about the dangers created by the increased volume of traffic around the school lane.
5)At present the nearby primary school is full to capacity and I am lead to believe this is so for approx the next 5 years
6)traffic lights/crossings would need to be looked at
318. Mrs M Barrow (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 480
319. Mr and Mrs D and Joyce Barrow (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 13:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
320. Mrs M Barrow (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
321. Mr and Mrs D and Joyce Barrow (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 13:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
322. Ms Jenny Barsby (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
323. Ms Mikala Barsby (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
324. Ms Deborah Bartlam (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
325. Mr / Ms N.S. Bartlett (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
326. Mr/s D Barton (Individual) : 11 May 2011 15:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
High Carley
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6M
327. Mr / Ms P. Barton (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
328. Mr and Ms D.F. and M.H. Barton (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
329. Mrs Marianne Bastille (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 12:44:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R103M
Housing
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
R103M (R675K, R103, M39)
Protection of individual character and setting
In the Strategic Overview – Core Strategy, p3, it says: “the quality environment will be protected and enhanced, including designating Green Gaps (as required) to prevent coalescence of the individual settlements and thereby protect their individual character and setting.
This raised 2 issues for me:
1) If the whole of R103M is developed then this will create the largest area in Kendal without any green spaces, eg for children to play on. With Kendal being so closely linked with the Lake District National park and surrounded by such beautiful surroundings, it would surely detract from the attraction of Kendal to potential residents to not have green spaces and views from the properties within it.
2) The current settlement at Stainbank Green was developed from a farm and the character and setting is still consistent with a countryside property. Although it is close to existing built up areas of Kendal, the raised position allows it to maintain it’s character of a country farm. When the development of this farm was done in 1972, the surrounding fields were allocated to be owned by the property owners to protect this environment.
If the development was to go ahead in area R675K this would completely destroy the individual character and setting of the settlement which goes against your strategy above. The northern most part of R103 would also cause some loss of setting however this would be significantly less than R675K.
Access
Car Access
For R675K and the northern most part of R103, the access to these sites appears very limited.
Access to M39 is easy from Brigsteer Road and the small area of road which was the old Brigsteer Road before the diversion due to the bypass.
After this short section however, the road becomes private and hence no access would be possible. This private road is also an established right of way for walkers making their way safely to Scout Scar (one of Kendal’s significant attractions). I do not believe that access through M39 would be possible as between the 2 is a right of way surrounded by mature trees with no room for a road to pass between them.
Therefore the only access to R675K and R103 would be through the entire area of R103 and also along Underwood and Stainbank Road which is already a main thoroughfare for sensibly avoiding the one way system during peak times.
Pedestrian Access
Although this would appear to be easier, there is a lack of safe access on Brigsteer Road, just west of Underwood. This part of Brigsteer Road is not wide enough for a pavement to be created and hence does not provide safe pedestrian access into town. Due to the placement of existing properties, this would leave the only safe access route into town to be through the entire area of R103 and back along Stainbank Rd and Underwood (a significant detour!).
Key Characteristics of Kendal
In the fact file on page 4, it says:
“Views out the east where the National Park begins can be seen over Kendal from the west coast mainline”
At present, very little of Kendal is actually visible from the west coast mainline, maintaining the characteristics of Kendal as a gateway to the Lake District. However, site R103M is in full view of the mainline in the exact direction that you extol in the comment above as being an asset of Kendal. Development of this site should consider the tourist impact of the main view of the Lake District hills being superimposed by a large housing development.
Thank you for considering these concerns.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
No
330. Mrs Patricia Batchelor (Individual) : 14 Mar 2011 10:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R69M
Housing
Oppose
331. V & J Bateman (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
332. Mr and Mrs Samuel Bateman (Individual) : 17 May 2011 16:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
333. Mr TD Bateman (Individual) : 25 May 2011 16:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (3 of 6) Kendal North East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M35KM RN181M
334. Mr and Mrs J A Bateson (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 09:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
335. Mr Philip Bateson (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
336. Mr Philip Bateson (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
337. Mrs Jane A. Batey (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
338. Mr Chris Batley (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 12:11:00
Settlement
Broughton Beck
Map Number
45 Broughton Beck / Grizebeck
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN209 RN210 and RN212
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Totally inappropriate development of land which would treble the size of the hamlet.This would increase dramatically vehicle usage of the link road to Ulverston which is a B road with a width restriction of 7 ft 6 ins. All public transport is to cease on 1st May 2011 forcing future residents to use own transport contrary to current government pfoposals for reducing "our" carbon footprint.
339. Mr J Batley (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
340. Mr & Mrs David John & Fiona Batten-Hill (Individual) : 10 Feb 2011 21:20:00
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Notes on the map that has been provided
I notice among your documentation, the use of the word 'excellence'. I fail to see anything excellent about the outcome of the proposed allocation of land and building works in and around Burneside. In the real world, we would see the overloading of Burneside's inadequate sewerage system, an equal, though far more immediately hazardous overloading of the village's road network, and a significant risk of assassinating the village's character. Moreover, the likelihood of distorting the village's employment/population ratio is particularly high.
Historically, Burneside and Cropper's represents a marriage. Not necessarily a marriage made in heaven but the spouses are clearly mutually dependent. We're a huge number of new families to be housed in Burneside, the only way in which employability could be sustained would be a massive expansion in Cropper's staff requirement. Under the current circustances - in any circumstances for that matter - this seems highly unlikely to happen. An influx of small businesses would do little more than fragment the area's socio-economic structure.
In the end analysis, my wife and I feel that the proposals offered are ill-conceived and more than a little short sighted. We oppose them, markedly and strongly.
341. Mr and Mrs TB Batty (Individual) : 18 May 2011 09:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R90M
342. Mr and Mrs Richard and Dorothy Batty (Individual) : 20 May 2011 09:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
343. Mr and Mrs TB Batty (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R90M
Housing
Oppose
344. Mr/s A Bauco (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 15:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
345. Mr and Mrs M & L Baum (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 09:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
346. Mr and Mrs M & L Baum (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 09:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
347. Robert Baxter (Individual) : 26 May 2011 09:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
348. Mr and Mrs R and K Baybutt (Individual) : 12 May 2011 09:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
Housing
Oppose
349. Mr and Mrs R and K Baybutt (Individual) : 25 May 2011 10:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
350. Mr and Mrs R and K Baybutt (Individual) : 25 May 2011 10:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
351. Mr IJ Bayley (Individual) : 4 May 2011 12:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
352. Mr Ray Beale-Pratt (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 22:39:00
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN225
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Very visible open space - need to avoid over density of housing in this area
353. Mr Ray Beale-Pratt (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 22:41:00
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R81
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
critical open space
354. Ms Lorraine Bean (Individual) : 12 May 2011 13:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R480 R674K
Housing
Oppose
355. Mr/s I A Beattie (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
356. Mr Malcolm Beaty (Individual) : 19 May 2011 16:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
357. Mr and Mrs George and Maureen Beaumont (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
358. Mr and Mrs George and Maureen Beaumont (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
359. Mr and Mrs George and Frances Bedford (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 13:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
360. Mr and Mrs Andrew and Jean Bednarek (Individual) : 12 May 2011 09:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
Housing
Oppose
361. Mr and Mrs Andrew and Jean Bednarek (Individual) : 12 May 2011 09:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
Housing
Oppose
362. Mr Ray Beecham (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 12:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (1 of 5) Ulverston Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R90M
Housing
Oppose
363. Mr/s Beglan, Barnes and Davies (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
364. Mr/s Beglan, Barnes and Davies (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
365. Mr/s Beglan, Barnes and Davies (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
366. Mr John Belchamber (Individual) : 11 Apr 2011 11:47:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Proposed development of site between Helsington Laithes and Lumley Road completely unacceptable for the following reasons.
1)Traffic congestion on Milnthorpe Road, already horrendous at peak times, will become impossible, resulting in traffic back-up and pollution all the way from the A591 to the centre of Kendal.
2)Destruction of beautiful approach to Kendal and rural atmosphere, thus changing the aesthetic nature of this area.
3)Sharp drop in value of houses in Lumley Road.
4)Unsuitability of sloping site compared to flatter areas of Kendal.
5)Existing empty sites should be developed first.
6)Development of E4M will further exacerbate this situation.
7)For all these reasons plans for M41KM should be dropped immediately.
My wife and I strongly oppose the ruination of this beautiful area of South Kendal.
367. W Bell (Individual) : 15 Mar 2011 08:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN22
Housing
Support
Employment
Support
368. Mr William Bell (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 12:38:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN22
Housing
Support
Please explain your reasons
The land owner understandably still requests consideration for development. The approximately 3.6 Ha. site could contribute around 100 dwellings at the Plan average density. Reference is made to the Plan selection criteria as follows:
The sequential approach has resulted in nearly all the preferred sites being greenfield. Site MN22 is no different, and is just as well located for the principle service centre of Kendal. The topographical impact would be much less than many preferred sites because the housing would be relatively well visually concealed in a minor valley and by tree belts including the one within the site along Singleton Parks Road. Vehicular access directly off the road could include a safety and free flow improvement by way of a mini island at the junction with Park Side Road. A significant contribution for affordable housing could be made from the development.
Nearly all the site is free of flood risk, the beck fringes being suitable for open space and accommodating temporary surplus surface water. Any necessary contribution to upgrade of waste water treatment would be made too. Car transport to town services would not be essential given the short walk to the frequent Larch Grove bus circular.
Allocation would help balance the distribution of housing sites around the town, all the more important on this eastern side owing to the local community's opposition to the preferred site fronting Castle Green Road and rear of Oak Tree Road (R121M).
At the detailed level, the setting of the listed Parklands would be safeguarded within its own grounds and by supplement of the boundary landscaping. There are no other neighbours to adversely affect, unlike many of the preferred sites.
If the planning authority is not keen on this comprehensive residential development, then an element of employment (office ie use class B1a) could be a solution, not disimilar to your designation R97M at Natland Mill Beck Farm.
369. Mr Eric Bell (Individual) : 18 May 2011 10:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
370. Mr /Ms S Bell (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
371. Ms Pauline Bell (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
372. Mrs Joy Bell (Individual) : 25 May 2011 12:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
373. Mr and Mrs M & E Bell (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
374. Mr David Bell and Ms Helen Kell (Individual) : 13 May 2011 09:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
375. Ms Mandy Bellamy (Individual) : 12 May 2011 13:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
376. Mr and Mrs Michael and Val Benge (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
377. Mr / Ms G Benjamin (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
378. Mr Nathan Bennett (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R690ULV
379. Miss Mary Bennett (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
380. Mr & Mrs Frank and Joyce Benson (Individual) : 5 May 2011 08:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M PS263
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
381. Mr C.J. Benson (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Housing
Oppose
382. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN13
Housing
Support
383. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R211
384. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN11
385. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
386. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R29
387. Mr and Mrs EK & S Benson (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R189
388. Mr P Benson (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 15:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
389. Mr David Benyon (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R670 M41M R83M
390. Mr and Mrs AJ & MY Beresford (Individual) : 11 May 2011 09:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
391. Mr and Mrs AJ & MY Beresford (Individual) : 11 May 2011 09:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Levens
392. Mr and Mrs Stephen and Jennifer Beresford (Individual) : 13 May 2011 09:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
393. Mr and Mrs Matt and Margaret Beresford (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
394. Mr and Mrs Matt and Margaret Beresford (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
395. Mrs Pat Bernard (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 13:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
396. Mr Mike Berners-Lee (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 18:56:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M, E34
Housing
Oppose
Other (please specify)
Household Waste Disposal Site
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
R129 :Reasons why not to go ahead
• This is an unsustainable place to put housing. There is almost no infrastructure nearby. The distance to town on the map is misleading because the map doesn’t show the very significant 75m height difference between the town centre ( nearest shops etc ) and the proposed development. (And even without the height gain, the distances to local amenities have been falsely understated in some of your documentation). The height difference means that the effort required to walk or cycle back from town is several times that which would be required to cover that distance on the flat. (Calculations based on the methodology outlined in David Mac Kay's book 'Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air' suggest around 5 times the effort is required to cycle up the hill compared to cycling the same distance on the flat. Details of the calculations are available from me on request, but sadly there is no facility to add attachments to this online response). Residents will find it difficult to travel anywhere other than by car.
• The traffic on Greenside, Beastbanks and Gillingate would be dramatically increased. – and difficulty of accessing local amenities or employment by foot or by bike mean that almost all journeys to and from these new houses would be by car. The walk or cycle is strenuous. All these roads have steep inclines, meaning that the emissions per car mile when travelling up these roads are many times more than those from travelling the same distance on the flat. (Calculations again based on the methodology outlined in David Mac Kay's book 'Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air' suggest almost 4 the emissions required to drive up the hill compared to driving the same distance on the flat and similar figures have come out of tests that I and others have carried out. Details of the calculations and measurements are available from me on request). The noise levels are also much higher from vehicles travelling up the hill compared to travelling at the same sped on the flat. The same argument goes for heavier vehicles such as vans and lorries servicing refuse and employment areas.
• The dramatic increase in traffic on Beast Banks and Greenside will have a severely detrimental effect on those communities – splitting them, and making Greenside green an unpleasant place to spend time and so on. At the moment the Greenside area has a community feel to it with frequent gatherings on the greens, children frequntently crossing the Greenside to see friends on the other side and so on.
• There is hardly any employment close to the new housing ( and it is unlikely that a high proportion of the employees of the proposed new industrial area will live in the new houses nearby – far more likely that they drive in by car from elsewhere)
• The developments would be visible from Scout Scar AND the cutting of mature trees that is required will also make existing developments visible from the Scar.
E34 –Reasons why not to go ahead with the Household Waste Disposal Site
Moving this to E34 would have a very detrimental affect on the Greenside area for the traffic reasons outlined above. Shifting to a less central location would increase the total vehicle miles and moving to a location at the top of a hill makes the problem several times worse.
The consultation has not been adequately pubilcised, the information has not been accurate and it is difficult to find out about te plans and respond.
. Specifically:
• The process for making local residents aware did not amount to so much as a note through residents’ doors. Probably as a consequence of inadequate communication, the vast majority of local residents that I have talked to were unaware of the proposed land allocations until some local residents began to spread the word with just two weeks to the response deadline. It does not feel as though a heartfelt effort can have been made to make sure local residents were abreast with the proposals.
• R129 is wrongly described in the plans– R129M is south of Underbarrow Rd not Brigsteer Rd – probably part of the reason that it hasn’t got onto people’s radar.
• The figure of 98 houses for R129 creates a misleading sense that 98 would be the actual number of houses built. The most likely contractors have no commitment or obligation to keep to this figure and 200 seems more likely. I understand there is a minimum housing density requirement of 30 house per hectare which equates to a minimum of 130 houses.
• It is unlikely that any developer would be seeking to use this land for affordable housing ,and the difficulty of accessing amenities and employment other than by car make it particularly unsuitable for this.
• Somewhere in the plans it is mentioned that access will be from Brigsteer road. This is not true. Access will be from Underbarrow road.
• The plans are difficult to find online.
Finally, the proposed rapid expansion of Kendal is neither necessary nor desirable. I understand that perceived need was derived from a strategy that the current government has abandoned. It is therefore now appropriate to rethink the whole basis for Kendal’s expansion.
397. Miss Ellen Bernfield (Individual) : 3 Mar 2011 14:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R81
Housing
Oppose
398. Ms Carly Berresford (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
399. Mr and Mrs R Berrie (Individual) : 24 May 2011 09:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN96
Housing
Oppose
400. Ms Linda Berriman (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 19:04:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121 M
Other designation - if you want to comment on something that doesn't have a site reference e.g., development boundary, town centre boundary, green gap, please select it here
Development Boundary
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I object to the proposed development of R121M for the following reasons:-
Flooding
I am at a loss to understand why other sites on the proposal have been marked as subject to serious flooding and this site has not. Flooding onto Castle Green Lane from Sedbergh road occurs frequently. The Beck running directly under my neighbour's garden also floods into my garden more frequently. When I first moved into my house 20 years ago,there was no flooding. What assurances will we receive from your selves and any proposed developer that the drainage sytem needed to sustain 147 extra houses on this site will be incorporated into any building plans? The current drainage system would not cope with the extra runoff from 147 extra concrete drives and the roadsetc.
It is not clear whether the boundary includes the row of trees currently sited at the rear of the houses on Oaktree Road will be taken down which would add to the problem of water run off from these fields.
In winter when the excess of water on the roads freeze on Oaktree Road and Castle Green Lane, navigating out of the estate becomes dangerous both on foot and especially driving. Last winter, I was unable to stop the car at the bottom of Sedbergh Road and skidded into a car coming up Castle Green Lane.
Environmental Impact
I am unable to find an Environmental Impact assessment of this proposal on your website.
I am aware of the variety and populations of wildlife that currently inhabit this area including the amazing variety of Birds including Kestrels, Herons, Moor Hens, Owls,Blue tits etc as well as the moles ,voles, frogs, toads and the insects that they feed on. What will happen to the colony of Great Crested Newts? This is apart from the domesticated animals that also use this land and help create the environment for these wild species.
Pollution
I was amazed to read about this land allocation proposal at the same time as reading of SLDCs problem with Air pollution at the bottom of Sedbergh road in Kendal. Will not another 147+ cars going into andthrough Town not exascerbate the problem?
It is not clear how access to these 147 houses will be made or which roads would be used.If access is straight onto Castle Green Lane , this would lead to queues of traffic on Castle Green lane into town.
Economics
I do not have any feel that SLDC has a vision for Kendal's future. It is not an industrial town and its historical market trading credentials are being seriously eroded. If its future is Tourism then surely the reasons why people come to Kendal are being negated. One of the main reasons The Castle Green Hotel attracts people to its site is because of the beauty of its surroundings and access to beautiful areas for rambling and wildlife.
It is unclear to me what and who 'affordable' housing would be available to. Without a national govermental policy on second homes, how would SLDC guarantee that the affordable housing is allocated to local people? Given the recession we are experiencing at the moment it is unclear to me how affordable these houses will be and who in the local population will be able to afford them given the employment situation in Kendal.
The closure of the Tourist Information office in Kendal does not bode well for Kendal's future ability to attract tourists on which much employment in Kendal depends.
Development Boundary
As far as I am aware the change of Boundary associated with this development has not been consulted on with the local population.
I STRONGLY object to to not being consulted about this and the fact that any change to the Boundary would have been brought about through this 'back door'.
Summary
I strongly object to the Development proposal R121 for Environmental, Economic, Flooding reasons outlined above and the change in Development Boundary.
The reasons for previous decisions by SLDC that this landscape is valuable and irreplaceable to Kendal Town and its residents still stand.
401. Mr Allan Berry (Individual) : 10 May 2011 15:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Holme
402. Mrs Kathryn Berry (Individual) : 11 May 2011 19:29:00
Broughton in Furness
Map Number
37 Broughton in Furness
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R163M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The site is a Greenfield site on the edge of the village. To describe it as 'infill' or 'rounding off' is misleading. Development of this part of the site might lead to further development which would change the nature of the village. It is a large area of grazing and should remain as one.
There is substantial run off from the site in wet weather. Water drains from the sloping part of the site, cascades over our low wall and runs down the steep drive onto Foxfield Road. Victoria Cottage has occasionally suffered flooding in their garage and has had to take steps to divert the flow of water. Any development would increase the amount of run off and exacerbate the situation
Because the site is elevated the visual impact of any development would be greater.
The sewerage system and drains along Foxfield Road are already over-stretched and would need upgrading. Access would also be difficult.
Notes on the map that has been provided
The boundary of the site marked is inaccurately plotted. I assume it is intended to follow the existing property boundary.
403. Mr David Berry (Individual) : 16 May 2011 09:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
404. Mrs Kathryn Berry (Individual) : 20 May 2011 11:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Broughton in Furness
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R163M
405. Mr Nick Berry (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M4M
Housing
Oppose
406. Miss Emily Berryman (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 10:36:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Other designation - if you want to comment on something that doesn't have a site reference e.g., development boundary, town centre boundary, green gap, please select it here
Development Boundary
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I oppose the deveopment of the land R121 because of:-
1. the damage it would do to the local environment.There is a lot of wildlife that live on this land i.e. many different types of birds, moles and voles frogs toads and newts as well as the farm animals that come to graze on it.
Lots of people walking and rambling enjoy the sight and use of these surroundings including the people staying at the hotel. I have met people walking around here from many different parts of the world who comment on its beauty.
2. The increase in the number of cars would increase the pollution not just around here, but also going into the town which is bad enough as it is.
3. The removal of trees and the loss of the soil would increase the amount of run off rainwater that ends up running down the roads and through gardens. This freezes in winter and is dangerous for motorists and pedestrians. There is a high elderly population who live in this area -they would be unable to get out in bad weather. The increase in the traffic would also be more dangerous for the very young and elderly.
4. There are lots of empty properties in Kendal and if these houses are not affordable because thereis not a lot of well paid employment in Kendal then these houses would just stand empty or be bought by people outside Kendal as holiday homes. As a young person living in kendal, it looks like I will have to leave Kendal to find meaningful employment.
5. The main trainline to London runs at the top of the hill bordering this land. We can already feel vibrations from heavy goods trains that run along this line. Houses built nearer would suffer more. Also, while train accidents are rare -they do happen as proved only a few years ago. Any new houses would be dangerously close to the track.
Overall, I feel it would be a huge loss to the residents and visitors to kendal who have access to this land for walking, bird watching and enjoyment of the landscape and once lost it could never be recovered. I alsofeel that previous decisions by SLDC not to build have been the right ones.
407. Ms Kathleen Betley (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R675M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
408. Mr /s L Betts (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
409. Mr Jeffrey Bickle (Individual) : 13 May 2011 10:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M
Housing
Oppose
410. Mr and Mrs Gordon J. and D. Biddle (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
411. Mr/s M Bill (Individual) : 4 May 2011 09:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M4M R97M E31M
Housing
Oppose
412. Mrs Andrea Billington (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
413. Miss J Bilsborough (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
414. Ms Elizabeth Bingham (Individual) : 3 Feb 2011 16:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Map Number
16 Bowston and Cowan Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R644M
Housing
Oppose
415. Mr /s J Bingham (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
416. Mr and Mrs A and Wendy Binnie (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
417. Mr and Mrs A and Wendy Binnie (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
418. Mr and Mrs Karen & Andy Binnie-Douglas (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
419. Mr and Ms John Michael and Patricia Binns (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
420. Mr and Mrs David and Brenda Binns (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
421. Mr and Mrs R and J Birch (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
422. Mr Nick Birchall (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
423. Mr Peter Birchall (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
424. Mr Peter Birchall (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 15:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
425. Mr Peter Birchall (Individual) : 15 Jun 2011 09:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M R107M
Housing
Oppose
426. Mr/s W Birkbeck (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
427. Ms Iris Birkby (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
428. Mr /s R Birkett (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
429. Mr Robert Birks (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 10:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
430. Mr/s DS Birks (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
431. Ms Mary Birtles (Individual) : 20 May 2011 13:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
432. Mr and Mrs R Birtles (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
433. Mr. Christopher Bisco (Individual) : 24 Mar 2011 17:42:00
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
General development of Arnside
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Support in part
Retail
Support in part
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
"Before responding to the detailed proposals, SLDC need to answer the following questions and to provide hard evidence of their findings, rather than just subjective opinions;
How many dwellings are needed in Arnside for the forseeable future? How many of each type of dwelling?
Where would the occupants of new dwellings work? What evidence is there of any vacancies in the village, or of new employment opportunities, or the creation of new businesses?
Will new residents have to travel away from Arnside to seek work? Where? What would be the environmental impact of this need to travel?
For all of the above, what is the evidence for these numbers? Source? Authority/credibility? Have they been professionally audited and verified?
Depending on the evidence provided above and the actual numbers invloved, the local strategy for Arnside can be fine tuned to meet that demand. The local strategy [in the opinion of the Arnside Village Society] should be developed according to the following sequential priorities and stages;
First identify and develop the brownfield sites, some of which (such as the old bus station on Ashley Road and the old telephone exchange) have not yet been included in the framework but are decaying and occupy prime locations. Development of these sites can not only provide significant housing capacity but also improve the current quality of the local building stock. The brownfield sites should be exhausted before going on to develop any greenfield sites. There is general support for this idea especially if it results in the construction of affordable homes for those with a local residency qualification.
If demand is more than can be satisfied by these brownfield sites, organic piecemeal development should be adopted by in-filling a number of small greenfield locations which exist around the village. They can be developed with minimal visual or other impact on the character of the village. Again, affordable homes for local families should be the priority.
Major scale development sites such as R81 ("The Common" with 41 propsed dwellings) should not be contemplated until all the above opportunities have been exhausted. Big sites will have a big and very unpopular impact on the village with a number of undesirable consequences. There is vigorous opposition to these developments within the village and from various agencies such as the National Trust and they will be strongly resisted unless they are reduced to small scale developments amounting to minor infill. Very strong and verified evidence of demand would be required before residents would accept them.
Before any development takes place within the village, the core logistical problems should be addressed and the following questions answered.
A) Are all the utilities able to service increased demand and will they undertake to make the additional investment? There have been substantial problems with water supply, drainage and power. Are they all resolved?
B) Is there a plan to resolve the issue of traffic flow in, for example, Station Road and Silverdale Road? Will it be necessary to make those roads "no waiting" especially near to the very busy junction of Silverdale/Redhills/Orchard Roads which are already hazardous to negotiate at most times? What will be the impact on Avery's and the Dentists if that becomes necessary?
C) Parking is already a severe problem, especially when the needs of residents (many of whom are reliant on their cars, for reasons of age, to get to the chemists, post office and the shops ) clash with the many tourist attracted to Arnside. Parking is already inadequate for tourists at peak times and there is anecdotal evidence that some give up and go elsewhere when they cannot park. What is the plan to deal with this problem, which would be aggravated by any scale development in the village?
D) Parking for commuters from the station is a particular priority if more worker/residents occupy the village. What are the plans to deal with this issue?
Finally, any new development in Arnside to service employment opportunties in South Lakeland should be tested against the desirability of locating those homes close to actual work locations, rather than in a place such as Arnside which inevitably involves significant travel to/from work and therefore undesirable environmental impacts.
434. Mr. Christopher Bisco (Individual) : 9 Jun 2011 13:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
new
435. Mr Jim Bispham (Individual) : 17 May 2011 14:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Employment
Oppose
436. Mr and Mrs Donald and Tricia Bissett (Individual) : 26 May 2011 08:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
437. Mrs Deborah Black (Individual) : 8 Apr 2011 16:49:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM & E4M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Other (as specified above)
No view
Please explain your reasons
I would like to oppose any development of these areas of land (ref: M41KM & E4M) for the following reasons:
1) Loss of existing attractive approach to Kendal from the South
These areas of land border one of the main access roads into Kendal from the South. (M41KM is a particularly prominent and steeply sloping area.) Together they provide visitors and commuters alike with a pleasant unspoilt welcome to the town. To build on this land would have a huge visual impact, totally out of keeping with the existing development in the surrounding area. Any development of this site would surely ruin this ‘Gateway to Kendal’.
This was also the view of the Inspector, Mr P Whitehead in the South Lakeland Local Plan 2006 Enquiry and I don’t believe that circumstances have changed to warrant a reversal of his decision at that time.
2) Suitability of site
The steeply sloping nature of the field proposed for M41KM would make any development highly prominent and dominant over existing residential areas on Lumley Road and Kentspark/Bellingham Road areas.
3) Increase in traffic and strain on local infrastructure
Milnthorpe Road into Kendal is already very busy and to increase traffic in this area, so near the junction with the A590, could only have an adverse effect on the whole situation. Any new entrance to either site from Milnthorpe Road could only cause additional traffic problems, on an already busy stretch of road.
Areas to the north of the town (particularly off Appleby Road) have been identified for similar development; use of which would not have the same detrimental impact on a busy approach to the town and with much better local services to support future development.
438. Mr Malcolm Black (Individual) : 8 Apr 2011 16:53:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41KM & E4M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I would like to oppose any development of these areas of land (ref: M41KM & E4M) for the following reasons:
1) Loss of existing attractive approach to Kendal from the South
These areas of land border one of the main access roads into Kendal from the South. (M41KM is a particularly prominent and steeply sloping area.) Together they provide visitors and commuters alike with a pleasant unspoilt welcome to the town. To build on this land would have a huge visual impact, totally out of keeping with the existing development in the surrounding area. Any development of this site would surely ruin this ‘Gateway to Kendal’.
This was also the view of the Inspector, Mr P Whitehead in the South Lakeland Local Plan 2006 Enquiry and I don’t believe that circumstances have changed to warrant a reversal of his decision at that time.
2) Suitability of site
The steeply sloping nature of the field proposed for M41KM would make any development highly prominent and dominant over existing residential areas on Lumley Road and Kentspark/Bellingham Road areas.
3) Increase in traffic and strain on local infrastructure
Milnthorpe Road into Kendal is already very busy and to increase traffic in this area, so near the junction with the A590, could only have an adverse effect on the whole situation. Any new entrance to either site from Milnthorpe Road could only cause additional traffic problems, on an already busy stretch of road.
Areas to the north of the town (particularly off Appleby Road) have been identified for similar development; use of which would not have the same detrimental impact on a busy approach to the town and with much better local services to support future development.
439. Mr/s M Black (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
440. Ms Elizabeth Black (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 10:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R144 R568 RN129 R679M R680M R62 R63 R554 RN150 AS56 AS93 SF121 PS37 PS249
441. R Blackbourn (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
442. Mr Michael Blackburn (Individual) : 20 May 2011 16:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
443. Mr Michael Blackburn (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
444. L & J Blackstone (Individual) : 17 May 2011 13:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
445. Mr Jason Blackstone (Individual) : 17 May 2011 13:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
446. Mr Gary Blades (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
447. Mr David Blain (Individual) : 15 Apr 2011 22:09:00
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
Rn131m
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Rn131m
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I do not understand why greenfield sites are being used up in this scheme. Such sites are a fundamental asset of living in this area. This comment applies to all greenfield sites. There must be plenty of brownfield sites which can be utilised before destroying the green belt. Furthermore such a development would ruin the conditions for wildlife: bats, owls, foxes etc which cannot be replaced easily. This section of priory road is already susceptible to flooding and speeding cars so additional traffic would be a major danger. In addition I do not understand why the council believes additional jobs will be created which will necessitate additional housing.
448. Mr/s D Blake (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
449. Mr TM Blakemore (Individual) : 23 May 2011 11:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R353 R89 R74
Housing
Oppose
Notes on the map that has been provided
New site suggestion
450. Mrs Alice Blakeney-Edwards (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 15:05:00
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M,E33,SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Dear Sir/Madam
I want to oppose the allocation of land adjoining Underbarrow Road (R129M) as a site for residential development,E33 for Employment and SL1B as household Waste Recycling Facility.The reason for this opposition are :
-increase volume of car traffic down Greenside, increasing noise, emissions, carbon footprint and will further increase risks to pedestrians , especially children needing to cross the road to go to School.
-Greenside is a conservation area and I believe this will affect the character of Greenside and streets in immediate vicinity
-potential risk of flooding
- The Kendal Transport Assessment said that the highway network could not cope with additional traffic frompotential development on Underbarrow Road and Brigsteer Road.
- employment- There is an empty industrial space on Underbarrow road
-increase pollution in the area
-will this development be viewed from Scout Scar
451. Mr Julian Blakeney-Edwards (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:16:00
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M,E33,SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I want to oppose the allocation of land adjoining Underbarrow Road (R129M) as a site for residential development,E33 for Employment and SL1B as household Waste Recycling Facility.The reason for this opposition are :
-increase volume of car traffic down Greenside, increasing noise, emissions carbon footprint and will further increase risks to pedestrians , especially children needing to cross the road to go to School.
-Greenside is a conservation area and I believe this will affect the character of Greenside and streets in immediate vicinity
-potential risk of flooding
- The Kendal Transport Assessment said that the highway network could not cope with additional traffic frompotential development on Underbarrow Road and Brigsteer Road.
- employment- There is an empty industrial space on Underbarrow road
- there are many empty houses in Kendal so why build more
-increase pollution in the area
-will this development be viewed from Scout Scar
452. Mr & Mrs G & Susan Blakey (Individual) : 19 May 2011 11:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
453. Mr & Mrs G & Susan Blakey (Individual) : 23 May 2011 09:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
454. Mr & Mrs G & Susan Blakey (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
455. Mr Stephen Blamire (Individual) : 31 Mar 2011 20:44:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M, R596, R117
Other designation - if you want to comment on something that doesn't have a site reference e.g., development boundary, town centre boundary, green gap, please select it here
Development Boundary
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I am opposed to the development on a number of points listed below.
Due to the overlying height of the new development it will overlook into our bedroom windows, and will result in an invasion of privacy.
The proposed entrances to the new development via Kendal Parks are narrow and congested and will take up car parking spaces on an already over congested estate and will increase traffic dramatically onto the estate and Oxenholme Road, which is also subject to increased building and sports development. The Kendal Transport Assessment also indicates that if this site is built on the combined effect would mean that more access points will be needed and recommends development should be avoided.
Both National Grid – Gas network and United Utilities have serious worries over the major investment needed to combat against the collection of groundwater and serviced investment needed, and advise against development as unfeasible.
The new development will obscure the boundaries between Oxenholme and Kendal and will result in the coalescence of the area and the West Coast main line railway.
By allowing a development of this size, will dramatically decrease the amount of green space in the area and with the size of the estate and surrounding estates already built, and the proposed new developments on Oxenholme Road, will have a devastating impact on the social life of the residents in the area due to NO or little green space parks available.
The desperate need for more communication services such as post boxes, telephone boxes, shops etc. will need to be addressed.
Due to the steep slope the development is to be built on, will result in over bearing houses that will decrease my garden privacy and as they will be above my garden will be able to look directly into my garden and no fence will be possible due to the height.
In previous Land Allocation Development Plans this development raises serious issues and concerns over highways, water fouling, detrimental effects on existing landscape and properties, road safety, over development and increased through traffic. I am opposed to the new development because in my belief none of these issues have been addressed and will have a huge impact on the residents of Kendal Parks and surrounding estates, and urge the council to look and favour other development sites.
456. Mrs Ada Blamire (Individual) : 3 Apr 2011 17:38:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I am opposed to the development on a number of points listed below.
Due to the overlying height of the new development will result in a loss of privacy.
The proposed entrances to the new development via Kendal Parks are narrow and congested and will take up car parking spaces on an already over congested estate and will increase traffic dramatically onto the estate and Oxenholme Road, which is also subject to increased building and sports development. The Kendal Transport Assessment also indicates that if this site is built on the combined effect would mean that more access points will be needed and recommends development should be avoided.
Both National Grid – Gas network and United Utilities have serious worries over the major investment needed to combat against the collection of groundwater and serviced investment needed, and advise against development as unfeasible.
The new development will obscure the boundaries between Oxenholme and Kendal and will result in the coalescence of the area and the West Coast main line railway.
By allowing a development of this size, will dramatically decrease the amount of green space in the area and with the size of the estate and surrounding estates already built, and the proposed new developments on Oxenholme Road, will have a devastating impact on the social life of the residents in the area due to NO or little green space parks available.
In previous Land Allocation Development Plans this development raises serious issues and concerns over highways, water fouling, detrimental effects on existing landscape and properties, road safety, over development and increased through traffic. I am opposed to the new development because in my belief none of these issues have been addressed and will have a huge impact on the residents of Kendal Parks and surrounding estates, and urge the council to look and favour other development sites.
457. Mrs Lesley Blamire (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 10:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M R117 R596
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
458. Mr /s S Blamire (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
459. Mr Stephen Blamire (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
460. Mr/s J Blamire (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 14:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
461. Mr John Blanchard (Individual) : 19 May 2011 14:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
462. Mr and Mrs Richard & Janet Bland (Individual) : 12 May 2011 12:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
463. Bryan and Glynis M. Bland (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
464. Mr and Mrs Steven and Penny Bland (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
465. Mr and Mrs Steven and Penny Bland (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
466. Mr and Mrs Richard & Janet Bland (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
467. Mrs Barbara Blatchford (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
468. Ms Charlotte Bleasdale (Individual) : 19 May 2011 14:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
469. Mr and Mrs B & J Blenkharn (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
470. Mr/s S Blenkharn (Individual) : 25 May 2011 14:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480 E65 RN169M
471. Mr Philip Blight (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 12:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M35KM RN181M
Housing
Oppose
472. Mrs Elizabeth Bloomer (Individual) : 9 Apr 2011 15:04:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R672M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Other (please specify)
agricultural 'green gap' extension to adjacent existing SSSI
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
As already identified in the site visit notes made during the consultation on emerging site options, this greenfield site is immediately adjacent to an existing SSSI. There are a number of ecological and geological issues that should be carefully assessed, if necessary with professional quantitative surveying:
Ecological issues centre mainly on wildlife. The natural woodland provides habitats for birds of prey, jays and woodpeckers, among other species. There are deer, badgers and foxes. Bats circle the perimeter of the site at dusk.
Geological issues are significant. The protected Kirkhead/Wartbarrow Limestone Pavement outcrops at the eastern perimeter of R672M. Furthermore, the shallow soil cover in this area provides only a thin protection to the underlying buried limestone pavement. Infrastructure such as sewerage would have to penetrate this bedrock, an expensive and damaging process.
I would also reiterate comments from other respondents about increased traffic flow along Allithwaite Rd/Risedale Hill. Emerging from side roads is already hazardous, especially in the vicinity of Cardrona Corner. Topographically, the elevation of this site encourages car ownership since all shopping destinations are relatively distant and downhill. With local authorities mandated to assess the carbon impact of development, this is a significant factor.
473. Mr Jim Bloomer (Individual) : 9 Apr 2011 14:59:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R672M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Other (please specify)
agricultural land adjacent to SSSI
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
Outcropping limestone pavement continues for c. 5m into the field. In 1987 a visiting friend with a PhD in 'Limestone Weathering' informed me that underneath the soil of R672M would be more limestone pavement which just happens to have been overlain by soil since the last ice age. This is probably worth investigation before the land is re-designated.
Both Kents Bk & Allithwaite POs/shops are over 1 km away. The vast majority of residents to a new development will use their cars to access all services with a correspondingly high carbon footprint. Local residents have a high average age. I would prefer to see denser housing within walking distance of existing amenities.
474. Ms Fiona Bloor (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 10:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
475. Ms Lorna Blundell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 13:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
476. Mr/s EJ Blyth (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
477. Mr and Mrs Michael and Janet Boardley (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 08:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
478. Mr and Mrs Michael and Janet Boardley (Individual) : 17 May 2011 14:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
479. Mr and Mrs Michael and Janet Boardley (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
480. Mr A D Bobbett (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M PS263
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
481. Ms Judith Bolam (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 15:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
482. Dr Christine Bold (Individual) : 16 Apr 2011 00:24:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN224 (listed as RN244 in parts of the document), RN86, RN37, RN87, R339
Housing
Support
Employment
Support in part
Retail
Support in part
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support in part
Other (please specify)
Improved access roads, footpaths and cycleways in and arond the village
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
After looking carefully at all the options through walking around the village and reading all the documentation very thoroughly, those sites I have suggested seem to have the least impact on the issues that concern those who have already commented in this consultation and from comments in previous consultations. RN224, along with RN86, seems to be an ideal place to extend the linear development along a road which already has some development occurring and without spoiling any views in or out of the village. Similarly RN87 and RN37 are next to a place where development is already occurring and which would not be detrimental to views in or out of the village. I cannot understand why R339 has been designated as open space that is publicly accessible. It isn't. It is a flat field used for growing crops. It is ideal for building on as infil within the village boundary. Building here would not spoil any views in or out of the village. Apart from loss of views into or out of the village most concern is expressed at the increased levels of traffic, pollution and safety. These issues are recognised in the consultation document for some sites more than others but the reality is that wherever new houses are built a suitable infrastructure will have to be developed to support and develop the village. Roads need widening, footpaths and cycleways need to be developed, parking space is needed for those existing properties that have no parking. Local footpaths and bridleways, such as those alongside R692 and through R69M need to be protected, not built upon or alongside. The footpath through R69M is one of the only footpaths through ancient meadowland near the village boundary. It is a well used route along with the bridleway next to R692. The pleasure of these local amenities, enjoyed by many from the village and other walking groups from afar, should not not destroyed by thoughtless development based on density figures and building styles more suited to town environments. Since there are several houses for sale in Allithwaite (many of these were for sale when we bought here 2.5 years ago) perhaps the targets (set by the previous government) should be reduced and the initial focus be on building the smaller affordable properties and social housing. However, without local work, people who need affordable property or social housing might not wish to live in Allithwaite and have to travel to one of the larger towns to work. It is very costly. Whatever size or types of houses that people live in they need space for their cars, to enjoy their gardens, grow produce (the demand for allotments in the area is high), for their children to play and to move around safely. People choose to live in village for the village environment, not to be urbanised and forced into being overlooked by housing that is taller and denser, blocking views and invading privacy. Whatever development occurs it should fit with the surrounding environment, take account of and accommodate the needs of immediate neighbours, provide open spaces within and around it, new amenities and benefits for the community.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
The development of a footpath/cyclepath between Allithwaite and Cartmel. The road is too busy for safe walking.
Wartbarrow Lane through to Grange widened to allow two cars to pass and ideally a footpath/cyclepath through to Grange.
Footpath/cyclepath to Cark/Flookburgh
483. Dr Christine Bold (Individual) : 16 Apr 2011 00:33:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R69M, R692
Housing
Oppose
Open space
Support
Other (please specify)
Local amenity maintaining a pleasant 'green gap' for walking.
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
maintaining a pleasant 'green gap' for walking Just beyond the northern boundary of the village. The footpath across R69M and the bridleway alongside R692 form part of a route taken by many locals daily and each week several walking groups are seen. Building in the vicinity of either of these routes would significantly lower the amenity value and force people to seek open space further out of the village.
484. Mr K Bolton (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 08:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R675M
Housing
Oppose
485. Mr and Mrs Tom and Wendy Bolton (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
486. Ms Jacqueline Bolton (Individual) : 27 May 2011 15:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
487. Ms Lynda Bond (Individual) : 10 May 2011 13:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
488. Mr Bryan Bond (Individual) : 10 May 2011 14:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R76M R681M
489. Mr and Mrs Phillp Bonney (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 12:14:00
Settlement
Natland
Map Number
11 Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R63
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
[1] Poor access to site as narrow lane and already mulki access development opposeite with excessive number of properties on site
[2] Insufficent drainage [ road already floods repeated in winter time due to water table being effected by in approrpriate development in St marks Fold]
[3] sufficent housing in village [with usold properties] and development will urbanise village loaction
[4] Land was gifted to present owners by people of village as a public amenity and not for sale as a housing devlopment
Notes on the map that has been provided
N/A
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
None further required
490. Mr and Mrs Phillp Bonney (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 12:17:00
Settlement
Natland
Map Number
11 Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R 680
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
[1] Poor access to site as narrow single track lane which will not support the inreased traffic generated site
[2] Insufficent drainage in area [ roads in village already flood repeatedly in winter time due to water table being effected by inapprorpriate development in St marks Fold]
[3] sufficent housing in village [with usold properties] and development will urbanise village loaction
Notes on the map that has been provided
N/a
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
None requiered
491. Mr and Mrs Phillp Bonney (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 12:21:00
Settlement
Natland
Map Number
11 Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R 679
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
[1] Poorest access to site of any proposed for village as narrow access via service road to existing
[2] Insufficent drainage [ roads in village already flood repeatedly in winter time due to water table being effected by inapprorpriate development and this land contains the drainage for Charnley Fold which will be adversly affected
[3] sufficent housing in village [with usold properties] and development will urbanise village location
Notes on the map that has been provided
N/A
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
None required
492. Mr and Mrs Phillp Bonney (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
493. Mr & Mrs Brian and Susan Booth (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 10:51:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
Other designation - if you want to comment on something that doesn't have a site reference e.g., development boundary, town centre boundary, green gap, please select it here
Green Gap
Housing
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
We are opposed to the building of 71 homes on the green gap land adjacent to Valley Drivefor the following reasons:
1)Our bungalow backs onto the land which is used for animal grazing-a little piece of countryside in the town,where are they expected to go?More and more of the green areas are being gobbled up by developers.These animals are part of someones livelihood,or dont they matter?
2)The extra homes are going to create even more traffic on Valley Drive,which has seen a considerable increase in traffic over the last few years as more and more people use it as a shortcut to avoid town traffic.
3)If these houses are built what about the extra burden that will be put on our already overstretced services.Schools are bursting at the seams,dentists and doctors are under ever increasing pressure.There are also not the jobs for any extra people that may move into the area which will in turn add a burden to our area.
4)There are already many homes up for sale that are not selling due to the recession,why should these be any different.Some of them are supposed to be "affordable"homes,but i suspect that these will not be "reasonably affordable"for our young people.
5)There is a public footpath to the rear of our property that is widely used,if there is to be
access for traffic via one of the cul-de-sacs this would more than likely cross it.You will also be turning what was a quiet cul-de-sac into a through traffic area.
6)We bought our bungalow because of its position in a quiet cul-de-sac with a nice view to the rear.We did NOT buy it to be overlooked by other houses,spoiled by traffic noise and possibly decrease it in value.
494. Mr and Mrs R Booth (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
495. Ms Andrea Margaret Booth (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
496. Mr David Booth (Individual) : 18 May 2011 13:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
497. Ms Sandra Booth (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
498. Pat Borland (Individual) : 5 May 2011 15:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
499. Pat Borland (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
500. Mrs/s Ruth Borthwick (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
LE948
Housing
Oppose
501. Mr & Mrs A Bottomley (Individual) : 25 Mar 2011 15:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Classification of Headless Cross as a hamlet
Housing
Oppose
502. Mr & Mrs A Bottomley (Individual) : 25 Mar 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN156M
Housing
Oppose
503. Mr & Mrs A Bottomley (Individual) : 25 Mar 2011 15:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN156M
Housing
Oppose
504. Mr & Mrs A Bottomley (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
505. Ms Jean Bottomley (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
EM482
Housing
Oppose
506. Mr D Bottomley (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
507. Mr and Mrs CS Boucher (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 12:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
508. Mr and Mrs R and C Boulder (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
509. Mr and Mrs R and C Boulder (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
510. Miss Lucy Bound (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 18:40:00
Settlement
Meal Bank
Map Number
28 Open Countryside Sites near Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
1. Significant increase of car usage on an already dangerous road network.
2. Sustainably compromise the historic and rural character of Mealbank
3. The need for the site has not been specifically demonstrated
511. Ms Phyllis Bound (Individual) : 25 May 2011 12:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
512. Mr and Mrs Boustead (Individual) : 10 May 2011 13:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Clawthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN14M
513. Miss Winifrid Bowden (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
514. Mr Ronald Bowerbank (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
515. Mr David Bowes (Individual) : 26 Apr 2011 17:11:00
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R130
Housing
Support
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Other (please specify)
The land at R130 is currently used for grazing. In recent years, this has become problematic as animals in the field have been chased and in one case lassoed. The field is partially in a flood are but, some of the land is raised and would be very appealing for locating some housing on in an area of Ulverston which has easy access to many facilities. a
Other (as specified above)
Support
516. Ms Mary Bowes (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480
517. Ms Mary Bowes (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
518. L J Bowker (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 15:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Map Number
39 Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN152
Housing
Oppose
519. Mr /s C Bowles (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
520. Dr Ruth Bowman (Individual) : 23 Apr 2011 12:02:00
Settlement
Hincaster
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN 128 and EN 143
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
As a resident of the small hamlet at Greenside I have some concerns about the proposed development
1) EN143. This has B1 B2 status, it would be inappropriate for any heavy industry in this area, any noise would affect all surrounding houses, and would lead to increased traffic on small country lanes. There are already unused industrial units locally, is this really needed?
2) RN128. I support the need for housing including some affordable homes, I can see that the proposed site would be suitable. I would be concerned about the number of houses within the proposed area and the proximity of this development to the existing properties
In conclusion, I would suggest the dwellings be built on the land furthest from the existing properties which is currently proposed for EN 143 for employment, and this part of the plan to be abandoned.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
I understand the bus service is to be withdrawn, this makes no sense in a village with no other public transport, especially if it is to increase in size. There are no services within the village, so transport to surrounding villages is even more important.
521. Ms Kathleen Bowness (Individual) : 11 May 2011 10:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
new
522. Mr and Mrs G Bowyer (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 12:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
523. Mr Robert Boyd (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 19:55:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (2 of 6) Kendal North West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The houses proposed, in the density proposed will be too expensive for locals. It is a sensitive green field site, very close to the National Park. Significant increases in traffic for Gillingate and Queens Road which are already congested. There are potential problems of surface water drainage towards the Ghyll.
524. Mr Robert Boyd (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 20:09:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (2 of 6) Kendal North West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E33
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
This site is situated on a visually sensitive area of Kendal Fell . Any development would be clearly visible from the paths over the Racecourse to the Scar . The site becoming overdeveloped for one which is adjacent to the National Park. There are other sites in town of similar size in less sensitive areas.
525. Mr Robert Boyd (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 20:31:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (2 of 6) Kendal North West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
SL1B
Other (please specify)
Proposed Household Waste Recycling Unit at Kendal Fell
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
This unit will cause an increase in the volume of traffic on Gillingate and Queens Road, especially at the weekends There will also be an increase in total mileage travelled for the users over the current site. There are also likely to be problems arising from the interface of household traffic of the recycling unit with the heavy goods vehicles of the waste transfer station. Again this is the overdevelopment of a site in a sensitive area adjacent to the National Park.
526. Mr and Mrs J & V Bracken (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
527. Mr Dennis Bradbury (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 10:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R81
Housing
Oppose
528. RL Bradby (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 10:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
529. Mr/s J.D. Brade (Individual) : 19 May 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
530. Mr/s J.D. Brade (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
531. Mr Stephen Bradley (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
532. Mr Stephen Bradley (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
533. Mr Rhys Bragg (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R44
Housing
Support
534. Mr M Bragger (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
535. Mr and Mrs H Brain (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 08:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
536. Mrs H Braithwaite (Individual) : 18 May 2011 16:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
537. Mr and Mrs Peter and Joan Braithwaite (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
538. Mr and Mrs Peter and Joan Braithwaite (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
539. Ms Angela Braithwaite (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
540. Ms Louise Braithwaite (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
541. Mr and Ms N. & Jeanette Braithwaite and Minto (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
542. Mr and Ms N. & Jeanette Braithwaite and Minto (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 15:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
543. Mr and Ms N. & Jeanette Braithwaite and Minto (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
544. Ms Elizabeth Bramley (Individual) : 5 May 2011 13:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R151M
Housing
Oppose
545. Mr/s M Brammes (Individual) : 6 May 2011 15:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Housing
Oppose
546. Mrs Margaret Brandon (Individual) : 17 May 2011 14:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN73 R339
Housing
Oppose
547. Mr Andrew Brannon (Individual) : 9 Apr 2011 08:59:00
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6 High Carley/Birkrigg Park
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Reading through the proposals this land was never identified as a potential location for development to meet the future needs of the area and supporting documents that suggest that the Birkrigg Park Association support recreational area in the context of this development is misleading as this “was not” submitted as part of the development. The Association support the use of the land as being for the public recreation expressing the desire for developments such as community orchard.
The land is a haven for wildlife, greater spotted woodpecker and many bats, hedgehogs to name a few live and use this field as a home/feeding ground.
Getting around without cars is a big safety issue at Birkrigg Park as there are no pavements connecting any facilities and the narrow lanes to the nearest local shops have very poor visibility for pedestrian walking with many blind corners and a national speed limit to make things worse. It is very dangerous for children even letting them go the local shop is a big worry so cars are essential there is also no regular bus route, the very limited services are due to be stopped I believe.
The traffic speed restriction which is 30mph at the crossroads where Red Lane, Carley Lane, Green Lane and Horse Close lane meet, is NEVER enforced and hardly ever adhered to. Road users already use these narrow roads as cut through in order to avoid the A590. Further development would mean increased cars, I believe, would have a huge impact regarding traffic safety.
The argument that this development will round off the existing estate in none existent the current development fits within mature tree boundaries this new proposal will stick out prominently from the existing dwellings.
There is a big question mark over whether the sewerage system can cope with more dwellings.
Residents adjacent to the area will be subject to negative changes to their views, reduction in privacy.
Highways access is inadequate and over land owned by SLDC
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
There is a need for pavements to the development so adults and children can safely get to local shop/post office.
548. Mr Roy Branton (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
549. Mr and Mrs/s R Brasenell (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Housing
Oppose
550. Ms Gwen Bray (Individual) : 27 May 2011 15:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
551. Mr and Mrs Andrew & Kate Brayshaw (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 20:04:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
We strongly object to the proposed plans to build further housing on this area for several reasons. These being;
The inevitable loss of privacy to our home and garden. Due to the location and positioning of our house and it's situation, any houses built on the steep slope behind our house would have a direct view into our gardens and windows. Not least the rear bedrooms which would be level with the new houses downstairs rooms. This loss of privacy would also have a direct relationship to compromised security of our property. Currently, as a family with young children we consider ourselves and our home to be very secure. However any development to the rear of our property would negate this, particularly as a public access path could run directly accross the end of our garden.
It is also a fact that safety and security would also be jeopardised due to a significant increase in traffic in the area. The Kendal Parks/ Oxenholme Road region is already congested by a high quantity of traffic, and with cars parked along the length of Hayclose Road (many for users of the train station) ease of access is going to be even worse if traffic increases to the proposed housing estate. This area houses a large number of families with young children and it is therefore a genuine concern that the children may come to harm.
We also have a worry that the housing estate will have a negative effect on our home and garden with regards to drainage. As the new buildings and roads would be situated some way higher than our garden, which in turn already slopes down to our house, there could be a potential flood risk as surface water drains down the slope.
552. Mr and Mrs Andrew & Kate Brayshaw (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
553. Ms Jane Breakell (Individual) : 5 Apr 2011 19:55:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R675M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
It is interesting that you use the straplne 'room to breathe, space to breathe'it seems to me that site reference R675M is a beautiful green breathing space within already established residential areas in the village. Area R653M is a far more suitable site for further housing in the village.On a more practical note the access ares proposed for site R675M are completely unsuitable for the volume of traffic that will be generated by the number of houses being suggested for the site. the fields that make up the proposed site are valuable areas of pasture land and should be retained a such for the benefit of the whole community.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
The community needs to retain areas of valuable green space to ensure Holme retains it's traditional, English village charm.
554. Ms Rachel Breakell (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
555. Mr and Mrs AW Bremard (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
556. Mr and Mrs AW Bremard (Individual) : 18 May 2011 13:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
557. Mr and Mrs C and M Brench (Individual) : 31 May 2011 12:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
558. Mr and Mrs C and M Brench (Individual) : 31 May 2011 12:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
559. Mr and Ms Derick and Rose Brennand (Individual) : 23 May 2011 16:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R103M
560. M Brigg (Individual) : 6 May 2011 14:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Housing
Oppose
561. Mrs Jill Briggs (Individual) : 18 Feb 2011 16:53:00
Settlement
Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Map Number
39 Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN 152
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
We oppose the designation of plot RN 152 in Egton with Newland parish for development purposes. We live in Penny Bridge but out of sight and some 200 yards from the proposed site.
The site is wrongly described in the Land Allocations Development Plan documents as being an infill site behind the Vicarage at Oak Vale in Greenodd (5.45 - p 94). This site, RN 152, is in Penny Bridge. The dividing line between the villages is the stream that runs at the side of the school. All local people know this. Also describing this agricultual field as an infill site behind the Vicarage at Oak Vale is not an accurate description. Oak Vale is a group of houses in Main Street, Penny Bridge below the Britannia Inn. The site RN 152 is not just behind the Vicarage; it is also behind the row of houses called Hill Garth; adjacent to the Penny Bridge to Arrad Foot road; opposite the recently built houses called Ellis Wood and crucially the field next to and below the parish church.
It is debatable as to whether building local houses helps safeguard employment in the Crakeside Business Park and Crakeside Works. Houses built at Ellis Wood did not safeguard local employment as recently nearly all units on the Business Park were empty.
However we do support the building of a small number of houses, especially affordable homes, for local people within the parish but site RN 152 is the wrong site. To choose a field merely because it rounds off the shape of the village on the map is wrong and does not take into account local landscape contours. The church was built on top of the hill to create an impression. When it was built 200 years plus ago, it was built outside the lines of the village, presumably on purpose and to make the most of the views. The views from the church have a high amenity value with sightlines across the Leven estuary and up the Crake valley to the Coniston Fells. There is a need to protect landscape views of this quality. To say in a supporting document under the heading coalescence about this site "it would result in the church becoming part of this community" shows a complete lack of understanding about why our forefathers chose that place to build the church. If site RN 152 is developed then the views towards Coniston from the church will be lost and the views that the village of Penny Bridge has of its church on the hill will be lost amid the house roofs.
We would support the use of field AS 29 for local housing purposes. This site is within the Penny Bridge village boundary, is elevated so is not at risk from flooding and is of a suitable size. The access road, locally called Doctor's Hill, has a poor access onto the A5092 but we are sure this could be alleviated by either making the road oneway (uphill away from the A5092) or by adjusting sightlines. David and Jill Briggs.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Car park needed for school.
562. Mrs Emma J Briggs (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 15:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Map Number
40 Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN11
Housing
Support
563. Mr Stephen Briggs (Individual) : 25 Mar 2011 18:47:00
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Map Number
40 Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R211 RN11
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Other (please specify)
RN11 for housing
Other (as specified above)
Support
Please explain your reasons
R211 i strongly oppose this sight due to firstly the high voltage power lines that cross this piece of land which could cause health problems to people living within a 60mtr radius of these and believe that these power lines are set to be upgraded to 40kw in later times,also this piece of land has a steep gradient which would give a domineering appearance of any new builds to the bungalows behind school road which are already established there, also any new builds would need an access road suggested comeing out at four lane ends, four lane ends is already heavily congested and to suggest more traffic would surely lead to more eventual accidents. Finally i do not think the sewerage would be capable of supporting new builds as the sewerage junction at four lane ends could get backed up and overflow,overall i hope the SLDC will take all this into consideration and do as they first assured me in earlier consultations saying they wanted peoples support not opposition and pick a sight which would not effect anybody which in Kirkby there are a number of but my main support as i have also marked down of RN11 with easy access to the school, a good clear safe exit onto the A595 and would have plenty of building land that would not effect any of the established residents.
564. Mr/s N Briggs (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M
565. Mr Stephen Briggs (Individual) : 17 May 2011 11:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R211
Housing
Oppose
566. Mr Jonathan Briggs (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
567. Mr/s D Briggs (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:30:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
568. Ms Jennifer Brightman (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
569. Mr Matt Brindle (Individual) : 20 May 2011 15:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
570. Mr John Brindle (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
571. Mr John Brindle (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
572. Ms Wyn Broadbent (Individual) : 5 May 2011 14:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
573. Mr and Mrs R & J Broadhurst (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
574. Mr and Ms John and Jose Brock (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E31M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
575. Mr and Ms John and Jose Brock (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
576. V Brockbank (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
577. Mr Stuart Brocklebank (Individual) : 9 May 2011 19:30:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Support
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I am writing to express our views on a few points that have been alledged about this site.
- "This area receives 120cm of rainfall in an average year"
So does every other part of Grange.
- "This area is known locally as Springbank, because springs pepper the whole hillside"
The area of site RN34 isn't known as "Springbank" it is Grange fell, and springs do not pepper the whole landscape. Our family has farmed these fields for the past 92 years and over that period have never found or seen any evidence of springs on this site or surrounding fields. Our farm is called Spring Bank Farm and over the entire holding know of just one spring directly behind the farm house. The land is very free draining and can be travelled on throughout the seasons.
-"RN34 consists of steep fields full of hidden water channels just under the surface"
The sites topography isn't steep but of a gentle gradient the same as neighbouring properties. Again, our family having worked the land for 92 years know of no hidden water channels just under the surface and over that period have never seen any evidence of such.
-"Grange Fell is along way from amenities"
Grange Fell is within half a mile of the centre of Grange and a quarter of a mile from the primary school. There is a bus stop directly adjacent to the site.
-"Almost all of the other protected open land in Grange is along the bay side, or a long way from here"
I agree because this area is a residential area. Hampsfell is less than a quarter of a mile from the site and can be seen by nearly all of the surrounding properties. This provides a natural large open space.
-"Grange Fell is the most densely populated part of Grange, many people have almost no garden"
Most residential areas are densely populated. Many houses in the area which did have gardens have been developed by the homeowners.
Grange Fell is a lovely place to live and a site of this size would fit well within the landscape providing housing for many new families without having a detrimental effect on the area. The site is available and could be delivered.
578. Mr and Mrs Ian and Krysia Brodie (Individual) : 4 May 2011 15:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R71M R682LVM R51M RN125
579. Mr and Mrs Charles and Margaret Bromley Webb (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
580. Mr and Mrs Charles and Margaret Bromley Webb (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
581. Mrs Fiona Brook (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 15:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
582. Dr and Mrs Kent & Pauline Brooks (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 09:40:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
This entire development plan is unwanted. Kendal as already grown too big such that the infrastructure, particularly roads, cannot cope. Further urbanization will lead to increased flooding risk. South Lakeland relies on tourism, this massive development will lead to a loss of the character which attracts tourists. Who wants this housing? So-called "affordable homes" will still be too expensive and all the new home will be taken up as hitherto by retirees from outside the area, further burdening local hospitals, etc.
583. Ms Eileen Brooks (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
584. Mrs Sheila A Brooks (Individual) : 3 May 2011 11:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
585. Dr and Mrs Kent & Pauline Brooks (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
Housing
Oppose
586. Mr and Mrs A Broomby (Individual) : 4 May 2011 10:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
587. Mr David Brown (Individual) : 2 Feb 2011 17:07:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R103M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Road access to West Kendal is not good, with the only roads allowing exit that are not single track at some point being Vicarage Drive, Glebe Road, Gillingate, Allhallows Lane, Queens Road and Underbarrow Road. Both Vicarage Drive and Glebe Road normally involve a right hand turn across the busy A6 to head South (the normal direction from these roads, including going to ASDA). Gillingate and Allhallows Lane both lead into the one way system including Lowther Street with its air quality problems, Queens Road often has traffic queuing to turn right across Windermere Road to head to Morrisons and North Kendal, while Underbarrow Road leads into the Lake District National Park through Underbarrow and Crosthwaite. Given that there is already significant traffic queuing at busy times on all but Underbarrow Road, adding more housing without improving the areas access will simply increase the Kendal Town Centre traffic and reduce its air quality which is against the stated aims of the consultation documents, and thus cannot be a suitable or satisfactory solution to Kendal's housing needs.
588. Ms Joanna Brown (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 09:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Map Number
32 Cark & Flookburgh (with Ravenstown/Moor Lane)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN20M
Housing
Oppose
589. Mrs Carole Mary Brown (Individual) : 19 Mar 2011 21:14:00
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6 High Carley/Birkrigg Park
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
The said land is a green field site and was never included in any plans for further developement.
The land suggested is a haven for wildlife.
Bats are regularly sighted in several places across the said land.
Many mature trees grow in the area.
East Drive, where the access point would have to be for a developement, I believe,would be unsuitable for a potential twenty plus more vehicles as it is a narrow access road serving Birkrigg Park.
As there are no pathways and ALREADY many child pedestrians, a further potential twenty plus more children would certainly mean further danger and a certain threat to their health and safety.
A developement, I believe, would have a huge impact regarding traffic safety.
The traffic speed restriction which is 30mph at the crossroads where Red Lane, Carley Lane, Green Lane and Horse Close lane meet, is NEVER enforced and hardly ever adhered to. Road users already use it as a "speedy" cut through in order to avoid the A590.
The junction where Carley lane meets the A590, where the speed restriction is 40mph, again is very rarely adhered to thus making what is already an extremely dangerous junction, a potential accident black spot!
There are concerns over how the existing sewerage facilities will accommodate further dwellings?
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
The bus service serving Birkrigg Park should be continued. Traffic management measures should be enforced.
590. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 10:53:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R674HM
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Development on the scale proposed cannot be justified in the short term, given the significant scale of recent development on Pear Tree. Developmnet of this site, even in part, would create an undesirable precedent for the development of lands to the south (R674h)which would contribute to a substantial expansion of Holme not considered desirable during the timescale of the LDF.
591. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:07:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R675M
Housing
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
Development on the scale proposed cannot be justified in the short term, given the significant scale of recent development on Pear Tree. Development of this site requires substantial development if access constraints are to be overcome. Additional substantial traffic movements via Station Rd and Duke Street will be detrimental to the character and quality of the village. However, there is potential for limited housing SPECIFICALLY for low-cost, shared equity and rented accommodation in close proximity to village services.
I am concerned that this site, once allocated, would be purchased by a developer to provide a land bank for developmnent over the plan period, resulting in the repeat of Pear Tree, and loss of a valuable open space east of the linear development on Station Road. The role of Holme is not as an expanded settlement making up the numbers within the overall LDF allocation. Such development is more appropriate within settlements which can offer a full range of public and community services (public transport, medical services; community facilities) This is also key to reducing carbon emmissions, and recognises the considerable cost of living in rural areas and having to travel by car to main towns.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Yes - there a 4 key points - the Village Hall ( in urgent need of funds for its renovation), the new sports area/club ( unlikely to provide a full range of facilities without substantial grant-aided funding), the pub ( a key social facility) and the Holme Mills club. The present disused Methodist Chapel on north Rd alsohas potenital though its future use may be determined before the adoption of the LDF.
592. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:10:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Land at N end of North Rd on East side abutting Chestnut Close and bounded by road and canal
Housing
Support
Please explain your reasons
An opportunity for a small scale development specifically to meet local needs ( rented/ housing association), with exisiting access in space.
Would also round-off the settlement to the north without prejudicing the amenity of adjacent properties.
593. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:14:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R653M
Housing
Support
Please explain your reasons
The intent here is clear and welcome. In view of the scale of development on Pear Tree Park, provision of specific P.O.S is important, also providing a clear break betweem Pear tree Park and proposed allocation R653M. I support this proposal, with access to Milnthorpe Road ( NOT via Mayfield). It wuld also confirm the NW limit of Holmes development.
594. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:24:00
Settlement
Holme
Map Number
9 Holme
Employment
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
Provision of sites for employment are an important aspect of LDF proposals. However, I am hesitant to encourage substantial new provision outside of a roads of appropriate grade ( generally A roads). Commercial vehicle access is restricted in Holme and traffic congestion and access are issues for Holme Mills where I do NOT support the proposal ( Map 27 : RN151M). My firm preference is for the development of the Clawthorpe Hall site, including the proposed extension ( Map 7 - MN14M). Regretably, my same concerns apply to E18M as they do to M35M. This latter site, not withstanding its proximity to the rail line, and the 11kv power line, offer more potential to residential use ( with access to Milnthorpe Road) than it ever does for employment. It is also easier to develop in relation to the sewerage plant.
595. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:45:00
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Map Number
7 Burton in Kendal (with Clawthorpe)
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Support in part
Open space
Support in part
Please explain your reasons
General
Burton has a strong physical identity, retaining much of its historical character, despite developments over the last 30 years. The LDF proposal confirms the desire to retain and enhance this. Further large scale development on visually prominent sites should not be considered, nor should allocations which remove valuable open corridors.
Residential
R76 - opposed - loss of open character into village
R681M - opposed - viually prominent and issues relating to capacity of access roads, traffic congesiton to A6070 and capacity of storm water sewers
RN226 - support - particularly to provide much needed additional 'local needs' housing
RN145 - opposed - undesirable extension into park land which is part of the character and setting of the village.
Not proposed but should be considered for inclusion
Part MN26 and EN14M - there would seem to be considerable potential for the use of the southern part of MN26 though this might be incompatible with the employment use proposed. My strong preference is for the concentration of 'employment' use at Clawthorpe ( MN14M), and I would support the reallocation of EN14M for residential use, incorporating conversion of the existing farm buildings in a way that has been so succesful in other villages e.g Lindale. As ever, the development should be strictly for local needs, with an appropriate proportion being social housing for rent/equity share. The location has good public transport links to Carnforth, and, with care, pedestrian links could be developed through to Burton village, possibly easing the congestion caused by on-stret parking to Main Street ( though new parking provison) .
EMPLOYMENT
RN151M - opposed - access to the site is severly constrained with congestion issues to Station Road and Holme village centre.
596. Mr Vic Brown (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 11:51:00
Settlement
Crooklands
Map Number
20 Crooklands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN16M
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I believe there is far more potential for the extension of existing units at Moss End Farm, perhaps in association with the road improvements and development of the new auction mart. As such, I am opposed to proposal RN16M on grounds of addtional traffic generation and the problems associated with the canal bridge crossing on the main Crooklands to Milnthorpe road.
597. Mr M Brown (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 08:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (3 of 5) Ulverston South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM
Housing
Oppose
598. Mr/s Brown (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 11:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
599. Mr and Mrs A.H.F. & W.M. Brown (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R40
600. Mr/Ms E.A. Brown (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
601. Mr Roger Brown (Individual) : 24 May 2011 09:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Housing
Oppose
602. Mr and Mrs K & S Brown (Individual) : 24 May 2011 16:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
603. Dr Paul A Brown (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
604. Mr/s J Brown (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 15:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
605. Mr and Mrs K & S Brown (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
606. Ms Lynne Brown (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 16:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
607. Mr/Ms A Brown (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
608. Mr & Mrs Gareth and Joy Brown (Individual) : 5 Jul 2011 09:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
new
609. Mr Warwick Brownlie (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
610. Mr D. Malcolm Brownsord (Individual) : 12 May 2011 12:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
611. Mr Phillip Jame Brunskill (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
new
612. Mr Chris Bryant (Individual) : 24 Feb 2011 15:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Leece
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
New
613. Mr and Mrs S Bryant (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
614. Mr and Mrs S Bryant (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
615. Mr Terence Bryars (Individual) : 30 Jan 2011 13:45:00
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Map Number
7 Burton in Kendal (with Clawthorpe)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN145M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Development Plans Manager
SLDC
South Lakeland House
Lowther Street
KENDAL LA9 4DL
28th January 2011
Dear Sirs
We are writing to express our objection to the proposed development of Burton-in-Kendal and in particular the area RN 145 M.
Whilst second home ownership is not a major problem in Burton-in-Kendal there is, arguably, pressure on affordable housing. However, with the pending development of The Royal Hotel this will be greatly alleviated.
Any new development has to be sustainable as recognised by the two local Councillors, Brian Cooper and Roger Bingham when, during a recent visit by the Housing Minister Grant Shapps, discussion was held concerning “fears that over development would over strain existing infra-structure and services and harm the rural nature of villages”. I argue that the proposed development of Burton-in-Kendal would do just that. In fact precedent has been set as a previous application for residential development at Clawthorpe, Burton-in-Kendal was refused in part due to insufficient local infrastructure.
However, if there has to be development then the areas should be restricted to infill and try not to expand the development boundary – in particular RN145M as this intrudes on what can only be described as quintessentially English countryside.
Burton-in-Kendal is a dormitory village with the vast majority of people having to travel, in the main by car, to work, to secondary school, Doctors and other services/amenities and with existing pressure on parking, the primary school and other amenities such development is not sustainable and should be curtailed.
Yours sincerely
Terry Bryars & Gae Hicks
616. Mr John Bryers (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 20:32:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Other designation - if you want to comment on something that doesn't have a site reference e.g., development boundary, town centre boundary, green gap, please select it here
Green Gap
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Other (as specified above)
No view
Please explain your reasons
A home owner backing onto open green belt space to railway. On purchasing house we were told NO building could take place at the rear or to the side of our property, you appear to be changing your minds. Even if this development went ahead, even a reduced number from the planned 240 houses, gives access problems, density problems, loss of privacy problems with bedroom windows being overlooked simply should not be allowed planning permission as a reult. there are no supporting amenities, no parking, no recreation spaces for the current population, this just compounds the problem. Surely there is better land to build houses, rather than on steep slopes that designers know only brings damp and access issues in the longer term.
this planning application cannot go ahead. i was refused a small Juliet balcony overlooking the open green fields, I would oppose ANY planning on the fact that I was not allowed this, so why can you build and over look my property?
Simply a bemused house owner on Hayclose Crescent
29/3/2011
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Parking is a real issues. Cars park on both sides of the road, in opposite directions, emergency vehicle access will some time in the future wil need to address this.
617. Mr & Mrs J & A Bryers (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
618. Mr & Mrs J & A Bryers (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
619. Mr John Bryers (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
620. Mr & Mrs J & A Bryers (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 14:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
621. Mr Anthony Bryson (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
622. Mr F Buckle (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R455
Housing
Oppose
623. Mr F Buckle (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R48
Housing
Oppose
624. Mr and Mrs Philip and Jennifer Buckler (Individual) : 13 May 2011 09:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
625. Mr and Mrs Philip and Jennifer Buckler (Individual) : 17 May 2011 09:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
626. Mr and Mrs Philip and Sylvia Buckley (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Endmoor
627. Mr /s L Bulliars (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 12:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
628. Mr. Christopher Bullock (Individual) : 11 Apr 2011 14:25:00
Settlement
Endmoor
Map Number
8 Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41M
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Oppose
Community uses
Support
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Whilst I agree in part that this proposed area is suitable for residential development, with the concern that the infrastructure of Endmoor - Water, Sewage and Electricity is struggling to cope with the existing population numbers. I strongly oppose the suggestion to use part of this area for commercial / employment purposes and cannot understand the rationale for the suggestion. There are more suitable and already proposed area's eg. the brownfield site off the road between Low Park and Gatebeck or Crooklands where plans are already in place for development. Commercial development within this residential area on the approach to Endmoor from the North, is at odds with the rural approach / boundary to the village and will increase traffic through the village to the detriment of all. Please do not put a commercial property in this proposed development?
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
A public footpath / cycle link from Sycamore Close to Gatebeck road would be desirable, possibly adjacent to the fishing tarn off Gatebeck road.
629. Mr and Mrs J Bullock (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 21:34:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
R129 is an important site regarding Biodiversity. In Appendix 2 you have identified Sensitive Species and various Key Species which inhabit this area. I know that there are badger setts in the area and I have seen them in the early hours of the morning.
With regards to the setting of this landscape, R129 is very sensitive and close to the National Park boundary. The National Park has been designated primarily due to its special landscape qualities and the setting of the National Park is also an important consideration especially with its possible World Heritage status. Developments at such a close proximity will be visible looking both towards the National Park and from the National Park looking into Kendal. These green fields act as a barrier between the National Park and Kendal town allowing a gentle and soft buffer between urban development and the Kendal bypass and onto the countryside and Scout Scar. The Housing and Landscape Study (Consultation supporting document folder) has stated that: 'Extension of the housing to the A591 will impact on the character of the landscape' which you have already stated is 'of high quality features relating to topography and biodiversity' (Land Allocations DPD).
In relation to other housing estates in Kendal, this site would be the forth estate built in this area as well as three existing tiers of estates: Kirkbarrow, Vicarage Park and Underwood and will increase the already overgrown urban sprawl in this area building one estate practically on top of another. These greenfields are important breathing spaces between the housing estates and should be treated as such.
The roads and transport infrastructure in this area are not suitable (also recognized by yourselves in Appendix 1 of the Land Allocations DPD) and will not support an increase in traffic caused by a new housing development. The roads in this area especially between the bypass bridge and the quarry are not suitable. The roads are unfit due to their narrow width and alignment (sharp bends)and the likelihood of dangerous accidents can definitely be expected if there is an increase of traffic. I have lived in a house for nearly 30yrs on Underbarrow Road, between the bypass and the quarry and endured several near misses/ accidents usually caused by speeding oncoming vehicles whilst trying to exit our driveway. Traffic accidents are at least twice annually ranging from near misses to collisions with other vehicles or walls either side of the road. There would need to be a major restructure of the highways in this area, if the housing development was to go ahead. If the private slip road cannot be used to release traffic onto the bypass, then Underbarrow Road will be inundated with vehicles. The road affected by this development also provides a well used route to the Scar used by walkers and cyclists and access to Rights of Way at Boundary Bank and other ROWs nearby so these should also be factored into the final decision.
Close proximity to the Kendal Fell Landfill site is also an issue. The Landfill emits methane and an EU Directive 1999 states that landfill sites should be 500metres away from residential areas.
630. Mr and Mrs J Bullock (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 21:36:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E33
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The siting of the proposed land at E33 is in a very sensitive and prominent place. The field which has been put forward is considerably higher than the nearby brownfield site E34. This site will be visible from Scout Scar and the A591. It is also directly adjacent to the National Park boundary which conflicts with the 'setting' of the National Park. In the Housing and Landscape Study (Consultation supporting document folder) it states 'The A591 is not visible over a local ridgeline and development should not extend up towards the ridgeline to become visible in views from this main route into the central Lake District'. The study also recognizes that the landscape of these fields are 'generally steep and impedes development'. If the area is landscaped in order to disguise the development, then will this not appear as an being 'obvious and clumsy' addition to a beautiful view looking out of Kendal? Being next to a drop in the quarry face, is this piece of land structurally sound to build upon?
The roads and transport infrastructure in this area are not suitable (also recognized by yourselves in Appendix 1 of the Land Allocations Development Plan document) and will not support an increase in traffic caused by a new employment site when considering its access. The roads in this area especially between the bypass bridge and the quarry are not suitable. The roads are unfit due to their narrow width and alignment (sharp bends)and the likelihood of dangerous accidents can definitely be expected if there is an increase of traffic. I have lived in a house for nearly 30yrs on Underbarrow Road, between the bypass and the quarry and endured several near misses/ accidents usually caused by speeding oncoming vehicles whilst trying to exit our driveway. Traffic accidents are at least twice annually ranging from near misses to collisions with other vehicles or walls either side of the road. There would need to be a major restructure of the highways in this area, if the employment development was to go ahead.
The site will require a lot of work to make it feasible, especially concerning access to Underbarrow Road. Is all this work and cost is required to make this very small site operational, is it really necessary when there are probably more suitable and bigger potential sites already?
Finally, I would like to comment on the direct effects of the combinations of R129, E33 and SL1B (Household Waste and Recycling site, Kendal Fell Quarry) if they where all developed. I realise that it is appropriate to only comment on each proposal individually, but a combination of traffic generated by all these sites will have a huge impact upon not only Underbarrow Road, but all the major town roads which will be used to reach the sites, especially the Household Waste. If the Household Waste site has been allocated (I still feel there could be more appropriate and more easily accessible sites for the HWRC) perhaps it would be prudent to accept this initially to measure the amount of traffic before allocating Housing or Employment sites.
631. Mr and Mrs J Bullock (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129 E33 SL1B
632. Mr and Mrs J Bullock (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129 E33 SL1B
633. Mr Paul Bullock (Individual) : 31 May 2011 11:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
634. Mr John Bunting (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 08:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Map Number
41 Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R684SW
Housing
Oppose
635. Mr John Bunting (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 15:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
636. Mr Michael Burchnall (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 16:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kirkby Lonsdale
637. Mr Simon Burdis (Individual) : 17 May 2011 07:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Milnthorpe
638. Mr Simon Burdis (Individual) : 25 May 2011 12:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
639. Mr Simon Burdis (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M9M1 M30 RN57 R93
Housing
Oppose
Other (please specify)
Special needs housing
Other (as specified above)
Support
640. Mr James Burke (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
641. Mr and Mrs Burnett (Individual) : 25 May 2011 16:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
642. Mr and Mrs Daniel and Diane Burney (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
643. LH Burns (Individual) : 6 May 2011 11:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
644. Mrs Helen Burrow (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Levens
645. Mr /s D Burrow (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
646. Mr & Mrs Steven and Veronica Burton (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 12:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Oxenholme
Map Number
12 Oxenholme
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R108M
Housing
Oppose
647. A & B Burton (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 14:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
648. Ms Freda M Burton (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 12:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
649. Ms Freda M Burton (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
650. Mrs Sandra Bush (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
651. Mr & Mrs T & J Bushell (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
652. Mr Steve Buswell (Individual) : 25 May 2011 16:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
653. Mr and Mrs Mike & Linda Butler (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal Town Centre
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
654. Mr Daryl Butler (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
655. Mr Kevin Butler (Individual) : 24 May 2011 17:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
656. Mr Neil Butler (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
657. Mr & Ms Phil & Babs Butler & Pooley (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
658. Mr & Mrs C Butterworth (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 12:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
659. Ms Dorothy Buxton (Individual) : 23 May 2011 14:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
Housing
Oppose
660. Ms Elaine Byford (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 14:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
661. Ms Ann Byrne (Individual) : 23 May 2011 15:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
Housing
Oppose
662. Mr Michael Byrne (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 16:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
663. Mrs/Ms Inez Byrom (Individual) : 17 May 2011 09:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
Housing
Support in part
664. Mr /s A Bywood (Individual) : 16 May 2011 15:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Swarthmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN109M R684SW
Housing
Oppose
665. Mr T C (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 10:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
666. Mr John C (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
667. Mr and Mrs G Cadman (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
668. Mr Michael Cafferkey (Individual) : 25 May 2011 10:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
669. Mr and Mrs David and Hazel Callaghan (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
670. Mr M Callan (Individual) : 11 May 2011 14:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
671. Mr Dave Callister (Individual) : 27 May 2011 14:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
672. Mr and Mrs HJ Calvert (Individual) : 20 May 2011 10:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
673. Mr /s M Cameron (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
674. Miss Nina Camilleri (Individual) : 23 May 2011 14:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
675. Miss Nina Camilleri (Individual) : 23 May 2011 14:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
676. Miss Nina Camilleri (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
677. Mr and Mrs M and I Campbell (Individual) : 23 May 2011 13:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
678. Ms Wendy Campbell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
679. Mr and Mrs M and I Campbell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
680. Mr and Mrs M and I Campbell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 14:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
681. Mr James Cannon (Individual) : 19 May 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
682. Mr /s J Cannon (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
683. Mr Barry Capp (Individual) : 6 Feb 2011 13:34:00
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6, ON7, ON8
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
1/ The northeast boundary of the proposed RN6 site incorrectly incorporates a triangular piece of land (a maintained gravel parking area) that forms part of and directly belongs to the adjacent Beech Court properties. The RN6 site boundary must be revised to accurately and fully reflect the actual land ownership in this portion of the map.
2/ Beech Court is a small private cul de sac with a relatively narrow (single vehicle width) road with no pedestrian footway on either side. This roadway forms part of the land owned by each of the individual adjacent properties. Beech Court cannot and should not therefore be considered as a potential or appropriate access or entrance route to any future developments on the RN6 site.
3/ The whole of the Birkrigg Park estate has been planned and built in both a consistent and characterfull construction style. Any proposed future development on the RN6 site must maintain the character and appearance of the adjacent properties and the surrounding area.
4/ Over recent years the RN6, ON7 & ON8 sites have effectively become a wilderness area that now would appear to support a very wide and diverse range of countryside flora & fauna (including many birds and small mammals). An appropriate environmental and wildlife survey should therefore be undertaken before any development of any kind proceeds in this whole area.
684. Mrs Alison Capp (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 11:54:00
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6, ON7, ON8
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
1/ The RN6, ON7, ON8 sites have previously only been recreational grounds and the sole previous construction on these areas was a cricket pavilion/changing room which was not subject to permanent occupation. The location should therefore not be considered as a potential 'brownfield' or 'rounding off' development site but as a 'greenfield' site.
2/ The proposed construction of 11 new houses on the small RN6 site represents a significant increase to the existing development density in the immediate surrounding area (east side of Birkrigg Park) and would not be in keeping with the established adjacent properties. Also it is unlikely that adequate parking areas or gardens could be incorporated into such a development of this density.
685. Mr William Capstick (Individual) : 4 May 2011 12:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
686. Ms Naomi Capstick-Newell (Individual) : 4 May 2011 12:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
687. Mr/s Cardwell (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
PS201 PS17
688. N, A & A Carlton (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
689. N, A & A Carlton (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
690. C & M Carlton (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Support
691. Ms Annette Carmichael (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Broughton in Furness
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R163M
Housing
Support in part
692. Mr and Mrs Robert & Krysia Carmichael (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:53:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
693. Mr and Mrs Robert & Krysia Carmichael (Individual) : 26 May 2011 09:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
694. Dr Gordon Carnachan (Individual) : 4 May 2011 09:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
695. Mr Chris Carr (Individual) : 10 May 2011 14:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Holme
696. Mr and Mrs Bruce and Sue Carr (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
697. Mr and Mrs Bruce and Sue Carr (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
698. Mr David Carr (Individual) : 26 May 2011 09:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
699. Mr /s S Carr (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
700. Mr /s S Carradice (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
701. Mr and Mrs O Carradus (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
702. Mr and Mrs/s R Carradus (Individual) : 13 May 2011 12:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
703. Mr and Mrs/s R Carradus (Individual) : 13 May 2011 12:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
704. Mr Gary Carradus (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
705. Mr and Mrs W. Carrington (Individual) : 18 May 2011 16:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
SL1B E33
706. Mr & Mrs J. Carrington - Birch (Individual) : 18 May 2011 12:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
707. Ms Chloe Carroll (Individual) : 17 May 2011 08:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R692ULVM
Housing
Oppose
708. Mrs Mary Carruthers (Individual) : 18 May 2011 13:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
709. Mr and Mrs CH Carruthers (Individual) : 23 May 2011 15:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
710. Mr and Mrs CH Carruthers (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 16:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
711. Mr and Mrs CH Carruthers (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 16:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
712. Mr Mark Carson (Individual) : 24 Jan 2011 13:04:00
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (4 of 5) Ulverston East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M26 and E30
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Concern about flood risk, which should not be under-estimated.
Concern about the addition of commercial traffic to the already busy flow of retail traffic into Booths and the Glass Centre.
Notes on the map that has been provided
The maps are very clear and seem to have been prepared with good attention to detail.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Pedestrian footpath and cycle lanes are badly needed along the A590 between Ulverston and Greenodd to allow safe use of this major road. Note that it forms a section of the Cumbria Coastal Way!
713. Ms Margaret Carter (Individual) : 8 Apr 2011 20:53:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Oppose
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Why so many houses? Yes to affordable homes and a small number of "market value" houses - no to unnecessary over-development. Why have "industrial" development here? why not have this in Kendal/Ulverston (better transport access) or develop Mile Road in Flookborough (road from the square to the caravan park with plenty of available space). As much green space as possible within MN25M should be preserved, and the road network will need to be carefully planned. There is already an issue with cars using the bridleway along Greaves Wood Road as a cut-through. This could easily become a "rat run" and a danger to horse-riders and the large number of dog-walkers. You should also be aware of the flood problem on Alithwaite Road and the Cardrona Road/Carter Road junction, and the fact that Kents Bank roads have been inaccessible at times during the last two winters.
Notes on the map that has been provided
I hope that the Development Brief will be circulated to local residents in due course, as stated at the public meeting, and that our comments will be taken into account.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Until we have a Development Brief to discuss, it is difficult to comment on the sections headed "Retail" and "Community Use" - it would depend on the extent of development agreed, whether a school was planned, how much affordable housing for young people would be provided - and hence local retail requirements and facilities for young people.
714. Mr MJ Carter (Individual) : 17 May 2011 15:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
715. Mr H N Carter (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
716. Ms Ange Carter (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
717. Mr/s M Carter (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
718. Mr and Mrs Derek and Gillian Cartledge (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
719. Mr /s KW Cartmell (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:15:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
720. Mr William Cason (Individual) : 19 May 2011 12:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
721. Mr Paul Cassel (Individual) : 17 May 2011 13:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
Housing
Oppose
722. Mr D J Cassells and C Henderson (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M38M R489M R664M
Housing
Oppose
723. Mr/s P Casson (Individual) : 25 May 2011 11:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
724. Mr Philip R. Castle (Individual) : 4 May 2011 11:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R127M R118 R679KL
725. Ms Joan Cate (Individual) : 5 May 2011 14:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Employment
Oppose
726. Mr Geoff Cater (Individual) : 19 May 2011 15:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
727. Mr /s Jo Cater (Individual) : 24 May 2011 17:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
728. Mr Simon Catnach (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
729. Mr Simon Catnach (Individual) : 20 May 2011 11:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
730. Mr / Ms V. Cato (Individual) : 17 May 2011 12:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Housing
Oppose
731. Mr/s RH Caton (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
732. Mr and Mrs Geoff and Pauline Causey (Individual) : 20 May 2011 09:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
733. Mr and Mrs James and Sylvia Caveney (Individual) : 17 May 2011 15:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Oppose
734. Mr & Mrs N Cavin (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 14:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Map Number
39 Greenodd and Penny Bridge
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN152
Housing
Oppose
735. Mr & Mrs N Cavin (Individual) : 13 May 2011 10:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Greenodd and Penny Bridge
736. Mr / Ms M. Cawthorn (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
737. Ms Laura Cemlish (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
738. Mrs M.E. Chadwick (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 10:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
739. Mr and Mrs Chadwick (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
740. Ms Mary Chadwick (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 11:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Housing
Oppose
741. Mr and Mrs Frank and Joan Chambers (Individual) : 4 May 2011 14:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R69 R21
Housing
Oppose
742. Mr/s PB Chambers (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
743. Mr John Chandler (Individual) : 13 May 2011 14:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
744. Mr Nigel Channon (Individual) : 20 May 2011 11:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
745. Mr and Mrs Andy and Lisa Chant (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
746. Mr and Mrs Andy and Lisa Chant (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 12:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
747. Ms Jennifer Chaplin (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 11:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Endmoor
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M41M
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
748. Mr & Mrs A Chaplow (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 22:55:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
e4m
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
No view
Please explain your reasons
This is the main entrance into kendal for tourists and visitors first impressions count and industrial units are not what i would like to see and remember of kendal if i were a visitor.I live below this proposed site and the view from my house would be obscured by these proposed industrial units.There is the noise which would also come from these units.Not only would the proposed site be visible from my house but also from all surrounding areas.
749. Mr Terry Chaplow (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 09:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
750. Mr/s M Chaplow (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 15:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
751. Mr Ian Chapman (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 09:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Map Number
32 Cark & Flookburgh (with Ravenstown/Moor Lane)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN20M
Housing
Oppose
752. Mr Glenn Chapman (Individual) : 15 Apr 2011 10:45:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I live on the Crescent which is directly opposite the proposed site of RN34. I'm strongly opposed to this development as I feel that it would not only increase traffic on an already busy road but severely undermine the beauty of this part of the town. I think Grange is simply not the place to be looking to develop in this way; it's a very unique town and the council risks damaging the tourism, natural environment and most importantly the quality of life for existing residents in the name of 'progress'.
753. Mr & Mrs Robert & Elaine Chapman (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 12:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
754. Mr/Ms P.J.R. Chapman (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
755. Ms Carole Chapman (Individual) : 19 May 2011 12:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
756. Ms Ann Chapman (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
757. Mrs Cherie Chapman (Individual) : 31 May 2011 14:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
758. Mr and Mrs P and C Chapman (Individual) : 31 May 2011 14:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
759. Mr and Mrs Alec and Betty Chapman (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
760. Mr and Mrs I & C Charlton (Individual) : 6 May 2011 11:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
761. Mr/s E Charlton Dixon (Individual) : 4 May 2011 09:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M4M R97M E31M
Housing
Oppose
762. Mr Richard Chatterton (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 13:01:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
763. Mr and Mrs Colin and Jane Cheetham (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 14:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
764. JM Cheminais (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
Housing
Oppose
765. JM Cheminais (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M
Housing
Oppose
766. Mr Alan Chester (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 11:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
767. Mr Christopher Chew (Individual) : 3 May 2011 10:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
768. Mr John Chew (Individual) : 16 May 2011 09:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R48M R455
769. Mr Iain Childs (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
770. Mr Brian Chorley (Individual) : 23 Mar 2011 10:12:00
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
R129M Plenty of "brownfield sites available within the town, houses on the proposed site will be too expensive for most locals and will only encourage use of retiral properties for people from outside SLDC area
E33 enough empty sites such as shap road
771. Mrs Shirley Christie (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 13:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
772. Mr Malcolm Churchill (Individual) : 10 May 2011 15:47:00
Settlement
Broughton in Furness
Map Number
37 Broughton in Furness
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R163M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Broughton is and always has been a rural community with a dominant farming interest. The site identified under allocation R163M is an important part of a large field long used for grazing stock - sheep during winter/spring and cattle in the summer/autumn period. If the portion identified in the map is allocated for housing development the remainder of the field will have little viable use since, on its own, the part of the field remaining, comprising a steep rocky outcrop, would not be suitable nor sufficient for grazing or have potential for any other use. As such, the site remaining would be difficult to manage and likely to become derelict.
The text of the plan refers to access to the proposed development being from Foxfield Road via the allocation site R186. This section of Foxfield Road is on a tight chicane bend and would present a very serious traffic hazard. The highways agency have always applied tight restrictions on developments in this area. Foxfield Road is a bus route for both school and public services and is the only means of access for the large pantechnicon vehicles that visit the auction market in the centre of the village to deliver and/or collect animals. On market days farm trailers park along Foxfield Road and the access to R186 would be severely obscured.
The proposed housing development of 16 premises on R163M will add to the urban sprawl of Broughton. The SLDC plan appears to be in direct opposition to the approach taken by the National Parks authority which is responsible for the land to the west of Foxfleld Road where they and the Parish Council have rejected recent proposals for grazing fields to be utilised for development purposes. The National Parks Plan appears to take a much more measured approach to conserving the rural nature of Broughton.
The plan makes passing reference to possible drainage/sewage connection problems and this is likely to be of major concern for such a large development. The existing services were not installed for the quantity of properties now envisaged and are unlikely to be able to cope with the additional capacity. Any necessary major service development work would be very detrimental to the existing residents and cause considerable local opposition to a development proposal.
773. Mr and Mrs Geoff & Jan Clague (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
Housing
Oppose
774. Mr and Mrs Jerry & Pat Clancy (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 12:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R39 R14 R445 R167 RN22 R168E R48 R445 R41 R109 R75 E15
775. Mr Nick Clare (Individual) : 27 Feb 2011 12:59:00
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Map Number
23 Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R41
Housing
Support in part
Employment
Support in part
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
There are a number of reasons why I do not believe it would be appropriate to develop housing on site R41, the land east of the A6 and directly south of Moss Lane.
Public Views into and out of the Conservation Area:
This field directly borders the conservation area in the centre of the village, and development would negatively impact the public views into and out of the conservation area. This would affect views for the vast majority of people who see Heversham from the A6, and also the more panoramic view of the village and Heversham Head from Marsh Road.
Compromise the Character of the Village:
Heversham is a linear settlement, generally set back one field from the A6 main road. Building on R41 would give the impression of urban sprawl and significantly detract from the rural appearance of the village.
Poor Access / Safety Issues:
The proposed access to the R41 site is via Moss Lane. This road is predominantly a one way passage linking the Church with the A6, and cannot support additional traffic. The exit onto the A6 from Moss Lane is dangerous, joining the main road on a fast stretch which is both on a bend and slight rise, thereby reducing visibility and increasing the risk of dangerous accidents. Due to the safety issues, there was a recent proposal for Moss Lane to be one way, leading only in the direction of the Church. The access from Moss Lane onto Church Street is also dangerous, with very limited visibility to the south, given there are almost always parked cars on that immediate stretch of road, and there is no footpath along the village road to the North from that junction. The road also narrows as it passes the Church, so to introduce more traffic to the centre of the village at that point would be dangerous.
We have experienced issues during the winter, when Moss Lane has not been gritted and given the slope, it has on occasions been inaccessible. From Spring through to Autumn, the exit onto the A6 is also increasingly dangerous, due the grasses / vegetation growing either side of the junction, which further reduces the visibility of any oncoming traffic.
In summary, I do not believe that R41 is an appropriate site for any housing development plans, given the issues highlighted above.
Green space and distant views of both countryside and coastline are basic characteristics of Heversham and Leasgill, and any plans for development in the village should take account of this. Building should be on a needs basis only, given there are few brown field sites available, and greater emphasis should be put on reducing the number of largely empty second homes, rather that building on green field sites in rural locations.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
I believe there needs to be greater emphasis on pedestrian and cycle links for the village and surrounding area. It is a concern to me when either walking my children to school or cycling in / around the village, that there is a large amount of traffic and we have had issues with the speed at which some buses and cars travel though the village.
776. SF Clare (Individual) : 6 May 2011 11:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
777. Mr David Clark (Individual) : 3 Mar 2011 14:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Storth and Sandside
Map Number
13 Storth and Sandside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN187
Housing
Support
778. Mr and Mrs Noel and Pauline Clark (Individual) : 19 Mar 2011 12:43:00
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R112
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
We do not agree that there is a need for as many as 47 new homes in Cartmel. If a restriction was put on the number of second homes and holiday homes there would be enough housing available for local needs. It is the large number of second and holiday homes that has caused the price of houses to increse so that they have become unaffordable to local people. A couple who lived in a house they owned in Burnley and had a caravan in Flookburgh for the last 15 years have just been given the tenancy of a council bungalow at Headless Close in Cartmel, If people were not allowed to abuse the system like this the local social housing would be sufficient for local needs.
We object to the proposed site for the following reasons:-
Haggs lane is too narrow to cope with the increase in traffic that new homes here would produce.
There is no footpath on Haggs Lane which would make it dangerous for pedestrians to walk to anf from local shops etc.
Building social housing here woul widen the gap between the haves and have nots and make this a ghotto area in Cartmel as there are already council houses adjoining the proposed site. It would be more in keeping with the village if small groups of less than 10 houses were built in some of the other suggested sites ie. RN690, RN 691, RN6 and RN172.
What looks like a proposed access road ON17 and the area behind it RN173 are next to my house or possibly IN my garden. Any road built so close would devalue my house and destroy my peace, privacy and security.
There would be air and noise pollution which again would have a detrimental effect on the value of my house.
Notes on the map that has been provided
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
I do not think we need any new community facilities.
779. Mr and Mrs Noel and Pauline Clark (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 11:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R112 RN690 RN691 RN6 RN172
780. Mr/s LA Clark (Individual) : 19 May 2011 13:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
781. Mr Simon Clark (Individual) : 24 May 2011 08:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
782. Mr Simon Clark (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 11:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R62
Housing
Oppose
783. Mr & Mrs John Clark & Chad (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 11:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN225
Housing
Oppose
784. Mrs Julia Clarke (Individual) : 19 Apr 2011 11:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
785. Mrs D Clarke (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 13:42:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Map Number
16 Bowston and Cowan Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
786. Mr Austin Clarke (Individual) : 4 May 2011 12:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
787. Mr Brian Clarke (Individual) : 18 May 2011 09:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R612
788. Mr A Clarke (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 13:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
789. Mr A Clarke (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
790. Mr A Clarke (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 16:54:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R107M
Housing
Oppose
791. Mr Austin Clarke (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
792. Mrs Dorothy Clarkson (Individual) : 7 Jun 2011 16:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Pennington
Housing
Oppose
793. Mr/s J.H. Clary (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
794. Ms Barbara Clay (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
795. Ms Wyn Clayton (Individual) : 24 May 2011 17:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
796. Ms Pamela Cleary (Individual) : 13 May 2011 15:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
797. Ms Pamela Cleary (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 16:02:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
798. Ms Jade Cleasby (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
799. Miss Anita Clements (Individual) : 9 Jun 2011 15:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN69 R67 R692
Housing
Oppose
800. Mr Brian Cleobury (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 11:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Map Number
16 Bowston and Cowan Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664M
Housing
Oppose
801. Mr Brian Cleobury (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 11:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M38M
Housing
Oppose
802. Mr Brian Cleobury (Individual) : 4 Apr 2011 08:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Map Number
16 Bowston and Cowan Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
803. Ms Celia Cleobury (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
804. Mr Robin Clinch (Individual) : 13 May 2011 22:39:00
Settlement
Broughton in Furness
Map Number
37 Broughton in Furness
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R163M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Access to the development appears to be via Foxfield road at a point between 2 corners of the road that may be considered unsafe.
Connection to the public sewer and capacity of the same may be prohibitive
Loss of amenity to those properties overlooked by and overlooking the development
Nuisance during build and after occupation
Fulfilment of the real housing needs of the local community cannot be guaranteed
The proposal seems to be in direct opposition to the Nat Park view who control development on the west side of Foxfield road and the majority of the town. Their approach appears to take a more balanced view in the consideration of the amenity of the town. Recent green field agricultural proposals have been refused after consultation.
805. Mr and Mrs Reginald and Susan Coates (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 14:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R681M
Housing
Oppose
806. Mr and Mrs Reginald and Susan Coates (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 14:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R681M
Housing
Oppose
807. Mr Russell Coates (Individual) : 10 May 2011 15:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R681M
808. Dr.and Mrs David and Susan Coates (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
809. Mrs Lesley Coates (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
810. Mr Robin Coates (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 10:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
811. Mr Damian Coates (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 16:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R690ULV
812. Ms Andrea Coburn (Individual) : 18 May 2011 14:39:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
813. Mrs Gillian Cochrane (Individual) : 18 May 2011 16:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
814. Mr J Cocker (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN156M
Housing
Oppose
815. Mr J Cocker (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
816. Mr /s T W Cole (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
817. Mr Gordon Coleclough (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
818. Mr and Mrs Peter & Glenys Coleman (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M PS263
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
819. Mr and Mrs Peter & Glenys Coleman (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M PS263
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
820. Mr Tim Coleman (Individual) : 13 May 2011 15:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
821. Mr /s S and T and L and A Coleman (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 14:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
822. Mr /s S and T and L and A Coleman (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 14:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
823. Mr /s S and T and L and A Coleman (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 14:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
824. Mr /s S and T and L and A Coleman (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 14:49:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Meal Bank
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN7
Housing
Oppose
825. Mr AW Coles (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:44:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R354 R355 R449 R74 R353 R672 MN25M R350M R350 R351 R349 R13 EN24 RN114
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Other (please specify)
Mixed
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
826. Mr & Mrs Malcolm Collar (Individual) : 27 May 2011 15:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
827. Mr Peter Colley (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
828. Mrs M. Colley (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
829. Mr and Mrs John and Joan Collinge (Individual) : 10 Feb 2011 13:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burneside
Map Number
6 Burneside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M38M
Housing
Oppose
830. Mr Danny Collins (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 08:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
831. Dr Jill Collison (Individual) : 1 Apr 2011 12:54:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
SL1B
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Re-siting of Household Waste Recycling from Canal Head to SL1B
Housing
No view
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Other (please specify)
I oppose the siting of all Household Waste Recycling at SL1B
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Currently household waste recycling traffic does not have to pass through a residential area. If the proposed extension of recycling at SL1B goes ahead, including moving all recycling from Canal Head this will significantly increase traffic through the residential areas of Gillinggate and Greenside. This area also includes Ghyllside School: additional traffic will increase road dangers to the school children.
832. Mr Stuart Colvin (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 12:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Map Number
40 Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R189M RN11 R211 RN63
Housing
Oppose
833. Mrs Jean M Colyer (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 12:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
834. Mr D Conchie (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 15:43:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
Housing
Oppose
835. Mr and Mrs Philip & Sheelagh Conlin (Individual) : 26 May 2011 08:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Bowston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R664
Housing
Oppose
836. Mr /s L Connell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
837. Mr Anthony Connor (Individual) : 24 Mar 2011 13:12:00
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Map Number
7 Burton in Kendal (with Clawthorpe)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R681M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Support in part
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
I am not against development in Burton in Kendal but this site (R681M) is entirely innappropriate for a number of reasons. (i)It is a steep site with considerable drainage problems especially during the winter period and at other times of heavy rain. (ii) Morewwood Drive is the only access road which is already busy and congested especially at particular times, morning and evening and at school opening and closing times. Housing on this site would more than double the number of cars using this road thereby making the congestion far worse. (iii)On many occasions the drains on Morewood Drive cannot cope with the amount of ground water flowing down; with 50 plus houses built above the existing properties this could make the situation far worse. (iv) A public footpath exists along the bottom of this site, this is very important route for local people, it's integrity must be preserved. (v) In more general terms there is very little or no local employment in Burton in Kendal or the local area so new homeowners would almost certainly be commuters therefore increasing the traffic in the area. (vi) The Primary School (Morewood) is operating currently at near full capacity therefore potentially increased demand could have a major impact on the school due to a shortage of available places. It may require addtional development to cater for the demand. (vii)There is a lack of Local amenities a PO/Shop, Butchers, One Public house and a Village Hall are all that are available.
If housing development is to go ahead albeit hopefully at a reduced scale the site MN26 seems more appropriate for development as it has much better access, it is not a steep site and as far as I know does not have drainage problems.
The number of houses proposed for all of these sites in Burton in Kendal needs to be reduced considerably, if this is done local people may be inclined to accept and support proposals.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
With the current financial situation it might be difficult to retain our existing community facilities let alone increasing them.
838. Mr /s A Constable (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
839. Mrs P E Constantine (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 14:24:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
840. Ms Kim Convery (Individual) : 6 May 2011 11:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
841. Mr and Mrs RJ Conway (Individual) : 10 May 2011 12:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R462M R151M R656
842. Mrs Celia Cook (Individual) : 15 Apr 2011 11:51:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (3 of 4) Grange South
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
These proposals will increase the built up area of Kents Bank by a very large amount (40%) which seems out of proportion to its current size. Most of the increased traffic resulting from development will have to pass through the narrow centre of Grange in order to access the main transport links and the A590. It does not seem sensible to site commercial development on this side of Grange. The Lindale side of Grange would surely be preferable. Lindale already has a large number of commercial premises which have unfortunately spoiled the rural character of this village. The least damaging choice would be to increase provision there rather than on currently unspoiled greenfield sites.
The Greaves Wood Limestone Pavement and footpath area is an important open space and wildlife corridor between Kirkhead Road and Allithwaite Road. The development of field MN1 and the southern end of MN16 will completely enclose the footpath and destroy the rural character of this area. For the residents of this area of Kents Bank the Consultation documents’ strapline “Room to live, space to breathe” does not appear to apply to us!
At the moment there is a good area of open countryside between Kents Bank and Allithwaite. The proposed developments will effectively reduce this by two thirds. The whole character of the area along Allithwaite Road will change from rural to urban. Allithwaite, Kents Bank and Grange will no longer have any distinct area of separation between the settlements. The area of green space allocated is quite inadequate. Field MN2 should definitely not be developed.
843. Mr and Mrs L Cook (Individual) : 13 May 2011 11:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M E33 SL1B
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
844. Mrs Celia Cook (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
845. Mrs JB Cook (Individual) : 20 May 2011 16:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
R150M
846. Ms Annette Cook (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R552
847. Mr and Mrs Kevin and Christine Cook (Individual) : 26 May 2011 13:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
848. Mrs JB Cook (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 14:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
849. Mr and Mrs John and Rebekah Cooke (Individual) : 15 Apr 2011 15:44:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R129M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
We are long-standing residents of Greenside with 4 children, 3 at Ghyllside School and 1 at Kirkbie Kendal School. We wish to object to the above proposals for the following reasons:
1. We do not consider that the local authority have made out the grounds for further development. In particular we do not accept that there is a need for 5,000 homes in the area - there are insufficient employment opportunities to suggest such a demand; neither do we believe that a large new estate needs to be created in the town in order to absorb any actual demand; there are sufficient small areas suitable for development without the need to make any radical changes to the map of the town;
2. We understand that the commercial units already in use from the top of Greenside (at Boundary Bank and the former quarry) are not in full occupation and there is no prospect of this situation changing in the immediate future; those areas are already remote from other commercial parts of the town and the means of access to them is inadequate and inappropriate to the existing residential character of the area;
3. Site R129M is thoroughly misconceived as a potential residential area for upwards of 98 houses for the following reasons: -
(a) It is beyond the clearly defined boundaries of the town and encroaches into open countryside in an area very close to the current boundaries of the Lake District National Park (where in our view those boundaries should remain);
(b) It is only capable of being accessed from Greenside - there is no through road; this will impose serious pressures on Greenside itself;
(c) Greenside is essentially a country road which simply links Kendal with outlying rural areas and is not suitable as a major arterial route into Kendal;
(d) Road traffic from at least 98 new houses would impose an intolerable burden on the existing bottleneck at the junction of Allhallows Lane/Low Fellside where problems already exist because of traffic into and from Booths Supermarket; the only real alternative route into town from Greenside is down Gillinggate which is already under severe pressure because of cars parking on the northerly side; from Gillinggate, Kirkbarrow would be adversely affected by additional traffic, which would create serious risks to the residents of this important residential area;
(e) Greenside itself is recognised by local residents as a fast road already, with people regularly speeding as they drive into Kendal (invariably as we have observed, using mobile phones at the same time); many young children live on Greenside, as well as elderly residents, all of whom are at huge risk of accidents already; mercifully, accidents are infrequent, though we put that down more to the caution taken by the pedestrians than the care of drivers(though with many near misses);it would be grossly unfair to residents to add significantly to these risks by adding at least 98 car-driving households to the traffic system;
(f) Because of the distance of the proposed development from town and the height of climb, it is fair to assume that anyone who lives on a proposed new development would need to be able to drive in order to live there; no one would walk or cycle there on anything like a regular basis and we simply do not believe that a bus company would want to lay on a service;
(g) 98 homes would represent a massive additional amount of traffic, both in proportion to the existing traffic on Greenside and in itself; each of those homes would have to have at least one car, and in some cases 2 or 3 cars;
4. Insufficient consideration appears to have been given to the impact of a development on the character of the area:
(a) Greenside is mainly a residential area; it is a conservation area with many fine period houses, both large and small; it retains a semi-rural feel with a substantial “village” green which is often used for local events;
(b) It has a close-knit community with a local pub which is well-supported by local residents; the turnover of properties in the area is fairly modest because people who move here like the area and stay for a long time; Greenside has the feeling of a village, which we believe is almost unique in Kendal; people generally feel safe about living here; this is true of families, older people, those who live on their own, and including a sheltered housing scheme for young adults, which is based in one of the larger houses on Greenside;
(c) The main part of Greenside comprises approximately 100 homes; the proposed development would effectively double its size and this would seriously damage the character of the area, both in terms of the types of properties, the impact of traffic and general dilution of the whole feel of Greenside.
5. We are also concerned about the impact of any substantial development on the existing infrastructure of the area, such as surface water drainage. A development would create a lot more hard areas which would impact on this and we would be concerned how this might affect Blind Beck in particular, along the whole of its length, past Ghyllside School and many existing homes, and where it comes into the town at Kirkland;
6. It is fair to assume that a proportion of new homes would have children living in them; Ghyllside School is the main primary school serving the area and it already operates at capacity and regularly has to have a waiting list due to capacity issues;
7. Regard should also be had to the environmental impact of a new development. Having walked up Scout Scar during the past week or so, it seems to us that a new housing estate would easily be seen from there and other parts of the open countryside; driving up a long and continuous hill with a serious incline like Greenside’s will generate more carbon emissions from vehicles (both commercial and private) than driving on the level, or a more modest incline.
We know that views similar to these are held by many of our neighbours and we hope that they will also oppose this proposal strongly.
850. Mrs Susan Coole (Individual) : 31 May 2011 14:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
851. Mr David Cooper (Individual) : 11 Apr 2011 21:05:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Support in part
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
1: The building of more houses would add to what is already a very busy road due to the amount of houses already on Valley Drive and the Heron Hill area. Also Valley drive seems to be used as a bypass to avoid the town centre.
2: The land in question floods very easily after light or heavy rain, which it does on a regular basis. It is still flooded at the moment.
3: The 3 cul-de-sacs in question for opening through on to the site are not wide enough and suitable for the amount of traffic which would go through them every day. Most houses have between 1 and 2 cars parked either on drives or on the road side making access difficult.
852. Mr Martin Cooper (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 10:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (1 of 5) Ulverston Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M26 E30
Employment
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
853. Mr Charles Cooper (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 13:37:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
LE472
Housing
Oppose
854. Mr David Cooper (Individual) : 12 May 2011 13:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN11
Housing
Oppose
855. Mr David Cooper (Individual) : 12 May 2011 13:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby in Furness including Sand Side and Beckside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R211
856. Mr/s M.C. Cooper (Individual) : 25 May 2011 12:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
857. Mrs Barbara Copeland (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 11:50:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R69M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
I would like to make 4 points about the emerging options for building development in Allithwaite.
1) The local need for 80 new homes?
Whilst there is a need for affordable homes in the village I query the need for a total of 80 new houses when there are approximately at present 25 houses for sale in the village. Where is the local need therefore for homes other than those that are affordable? There also needs to be a further discussion on what is meant by ‘affordable’.
2) Why large developments?
To build a development of 40 houses in one area creates a more urbane feel to a village that has grown gradually in keeping with its rural surroundings. Smaller developments spread around the village, as proposed by Allithwaite Steering Group, and in agreement with landowners, would enable the village to continue to grow in harmony with the rural environment. More importantly by encouraging local builders, rather than developers from outside the area, to construct the buildings in the smaller developments, it will support the local economy and ensure sustainability which is one of the main objectives of the South Lakeland Local Development Framework.
3) Use of Green Space outside village?
The two fields in question which are numbered R69M:
• are green space
• are outside the village development boundary
• are typical rural village pastureland
• with dry stone walls
• have a well-used public footpath running through both fields.
All the above points would question why they have been chosen as emerging
options. In addition the fields are at the entrance to the village from the historic village of Cartmel and a substantial development at the entrance to the village would have a detrimental visual impact for the many visitors to the area.
4) Practical issues such as infrastructure
A previous planning application for one of the fields R69 was rejected due to
"The sewerage and sewage disposal arrangements for the village are not adequate to serve additional development" but more importantly "The approach road (Wartbarrow Lane)is inadequate to cater for the increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic which would result from the proposed development."
The three routes out of the village from the site are Wartbarrow Lane, Church Road and Cartmel Road. It can be expected that with 40 houses there will be at the bare minimum 40 extra vehicles attempting to make their way out of the village via Wartbarrow Lane (a single track lane), Cartmel Road (single track in some places) and Church Road (the main road running through the village which takes all the traffic from other developments in the village and on which is sited the village school.) Church Road is also the only place to park for many houses situated on that road.
Further considerations will have to be given to the capacity of the school, public transport, health care and the impact on the environment for example with additional street lighting and exhaust fumes. All of the above practical issues must be taken into account with the impact of the other proposed emerging option, site R343M, approximately 50 metres in distance from R69M and therefore with a similar amount of housing proposed we are looking at doubling the above impact.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Traffic management which will support pedestrian and cycle links.
858. Mrs Barbara Copeland (Individual) : 12 Apr 2011 12:06:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R343M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
No view
Retail
No view
Community uses
No view
Open space
No view
Please explain your reasons
I would like to make 3 points about the emerging options for building development in Allithwaite.
1) The local need for 80 new homes?
Whilst there is a need for affordable homes in the village I query the need for a total of 80 new houses when there are approximately at present 25 houses for sale in the village. Where is the local need therefore for homes other than those that are affordable? There also needs to be a further discussion on what is meant by ‘affordable’.
2) Why large developments?
To build a development of 40 houses in one area creates a more urbane feel to a village that has grown gradually in keeping with its rural surroundings. Smaller developments spread around the village, as proposed by Allithwaite Steering Group, and in agreement with landowners, would enable the village to continue to grow in harmony with the rural environment. More importantly by encouraging local builders, rather than developers from outside the area, to construct the buildings in the smaller developments, it will support the local economy and ensure sustainability which is one of the main objectives of the South Lakeland Local Development Framework.
3) Practical issues such as infrastructure
The three routes out of the village from the site are Wartbarrow Lane, Church Road and Cartmel Road. It can be expected that with 40 houses there will be at the bare minimum 40 extra vehicles attempting to make their way out of the village via Wartbarrow Lane (a single track lane), Cartmel Road (single track in some places) and Church Road (the main road running through the village which takes all the traffic from other developments in the village and on which is sited the village school. Church Road is also the only place to park for many houses situated on that road.
Further considerations will have to be given to the capacity of the school, public transport, health care and the impact on the environment for example with additional street lighting and exhaust fumes. All of the above practical issues must be taken into account with the impact of the other proposed emerging option, site R69M, approximately 50 metres in distance from R343M and therefore with a similar amount of housing proposed we are looking at doubling the above impact.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
Traffic management together with pedestrian and cycle links
859. Mr Robert Copeland (Individual) : 13 Apr 2011 11:34:00
Settlement
Allithwaite
Map Number
31 Allithwaite
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R69M
Housing
Oppose
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
Development on the 2 fields at the north of the village is outside the village boundary and will extend the village into the green gap between Cartmel and Allithwaite.
The village does need affordable homes, it does not need great numbers of full price homes. Developments should also be small, 40 houses built in 2 relatively small fields will not enhance the village but will create an urban style development.
There is inadequate access for traffic from those fields - 3 rural lanes and one road that runs through the village that is almost a single lane with car parking on the road.
860. Mr and Mrs John and Jane Corbett (Individual) : 26 May 2011 15:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M R141 R56 R676KE
861. Mrs Vanessa Cordwell (Individual) : 13 May 2011 23:41:00
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Map Number
23 Heversham and Leasgill
Housing
Support in part
Employment
No view
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
No view
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
I first moved to Heversham in 1977, over 33 years ago and have variously lived at Woodhouse, on Dugg Hill and in the centre of the village. My mother has lived for the same length of time on Woodhouse Lane. I would like to make the following points:
•The village could not support any more than 20 new houses without considerable infrastructure development which would change Heversham from a ‘small’ village to a Service Centre. Do we really want this?
•With the price of fuel steadily increasing, it is unlikely that young families will want to live in villages without services. More available houses will only encourage more holiday homes. Perhaps the planners should reconsider the allocation of housing accordingly. Milnthorpe must be much more appealing for young people.
•Dallam School car park R455 seems to be the best site for new housing.
•R41 is unsuitable for housing as there is no safe access and the Conservation Area would be compromised.
•R48M is also unsuitable as the approach to the village from the south would be spoilt.
•If we really do need further housing (which I doubt), then a small landscaped development on RN118M, with access from Parkhouse Drive would seen to be the most acceptable.
•When we bought our house on Dugg Hill 25 years ago, we were made aware then of possible future development from the hammerheads.
862. Mr D Core (Individual) : 27 Jan 2011 09:55:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R89
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
R89
Housing
Oppose
863. Mr D Core (Individual) : 23 May 2011 12:46:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
864. Mr D Core (Individual) : 20 Jun 2011 11:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R89
Housing
Oppose
865. Mr/s EP Corless (Individual) : 6 May 2011 15:20:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
Housing
Oppose
866. Mr Michael Corrie (Individual) : 31 May 2011 12:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
867. Mr and Mrs Matthew and Elizabeth Corry (Individual) : 12 May 2011 09:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M4M R97M E31M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
868. Mr & Mrs W Corscadden (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 14:29:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
869. Mr Denis James Cosgrave (Individual) : 18 May 2011 15:19:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
870. Mr Cosgrave Cosgrove (Individual) : 24 May 2011 15:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
871. Mr John Cottam (Individual) : 6 May 2011 11:32:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
872. Mr & Mrs David & Linda Cotter (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 14:26:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6M
Housing
Oppose
873. Mr & Mrs David & Linda Cotter (Individual) : 9 Mar 2011 14:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6M
Housing
Oppose
874. Mr Nick Cotton (Individual) : 5 May 2011 15:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kirkby Lonsdale
875. Mr Patrick Coughlan (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 10:06:00
Kendal
Map Number
1 (2 of 6) Kendal North West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
SL1B, R129M, E33
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Other (please specify)
Traffic Congestion, Polution & Noise
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I wish to oppose the use of land on Underbarrow road to relocate the Household Waste Recycling facility (SL1B), to build a housing development (R129M) and an employment area (E33). This is because of the greatly increased volume of traffic generated along Greenside and adjoining roads into Kendal leading to increased hazards for pedestrians, especially children, and car polution and noise that will result from these plans. The proposed sites are all up steep hills outside of Kendal town centre and because of their nature will only be accessed by car and not on foot or public transport increasing the traffic safety problems in a residential area with many children.
876. Mrs M Counsell (Individual) : 4 May 2011 14:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
877. Mr Anthony Cousins (Individual) : 26 May 2011 13:45:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M35KM
878. Mr Anthony Cousins (Individual) : 26 May 2011 14:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN181M
879. Mr John Covill (Individual) : 5 May 2011 11:33:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
880. Mr /s D Cowan (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 12:41:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
881. Mr & Mrs William and Kathleen Coward (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M RN19M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
882. Mr & Mrs William and Kathleen Coward (Individual) : 5 May 2011 09:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN18M RN175M RN19M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
883. Mr and Mrs John and Valerie Coward (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R321M
Housing
Support
884. Mr and Mrs John and Valerie Coward (Individual) : 12 May 2011 08:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Cark & Flookburgh
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R321M
Housing
Support
885. Mrs J Coward (Individual) : 20 May 2011 09:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Housing
Oppose
886. Mr and Mrs A and B Coward (Individual) : 31 May 2011 17:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM
887. Mr and Mrs A and B Coward (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 11:51:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
888. Mr Roger A. Cowgill (Individual) : 18 May 2011 11:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Levens
Map Number
10 Levens
Housing
Oppose
889. Mr Derek Cowie (Individual) : 11 May 2011 11:34:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Levens
890. Mr and Mrs M and S Cowton and Cowton Williams (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 09:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Cark & Flookburgh
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E47
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
891. Mr Alan Cox (Individual) : 21 Apr 2011 12:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
892. Ms E Stephanie Cox (Individual) : 23 May 2011 16:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
893. Ms Caroline Cox (Individual) : 31 May 2011 13:05:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
894. Mr Andrew Cox (Individual) : 31 May 2011 13:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
895. Mrs Seira Crabbe (Individual) : 27 Mar 2011 20:31:00
Settlement
High Carley
Map Number
47 High Carley / Pennington & Rowe Head
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN6M
Housing
Oppose
Community uses
Support
Open space
Support
Please explain your reasons
As this land was not mentioned in the SHLAA, we agree with the view that this is not identified for the development of housing. The site in question is a green field site unlike the current Birkrigg Park development which was built on a brown field site. As the proposed site was for recreational use, we agree that it should remain so, also the proposed development we do not feel would be a rounding off as it was never part of the original design or plan for the site. We see this as extending the development into a greenfield space and as such would impact on both the natural environment and wildlife - bats, birds and other wildlife which nest in the many trees (another issue). Also the proposed access road would bisect the recreational area which would have implications for its use as an open space and would make it unsafe for children to play. The road junction from North Green into East Drive is already busy, and a further junction along from this would cause chaos at busy times.
Do you think that your area needs new or improved community facilities? If so, what sort of facilities and where?
Please explain the types of improved and/or new community facilities your community may need in the next 15 years
The propsed use of the site for a community recreational area and allottments would be more suitable as this would have limited effect on the local environment and wildlife of which there are many species of birds, bats and small rodents in the area - also hedgehogs, frogs etc. Any building on these allottments would have to be as on Birkrigg Park, subject to planning application.
896. Miss K.S.M. Crabtree (Individual) : 18 May 2011 16:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
897. Miss K.S.M. Crabtree (Individual) : 25 May 2011 11:23:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Milnthorpe
Map Number
4 (1 of 2) Milnthorpe (with Ackenthwaite)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN57 R93
898. Mr Tony Cragg (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 08:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
Retail
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
899. Mr and Mrs A. Craig (Individual) : 26 May 2011 12:52:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M R141 R56
Housing
Oppose
900. Mr & Mrs Edward Craker (Individual) : 7 Apr 2011 13:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Storth and Sandside
Map Number
13 Storth and Sandside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
M683SM
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
901. Mr and Mrs Dennis and Simone Crane (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
902. Mr and Mrs Dennis and Simone Crane (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
903. Mr and Mrs R Crane (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 11:21:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
904. Mr and Mrs W. and Patricia Crawford (Individual) : 20 Apr 2011 15:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Map Number
35 (1 of 5) Ulverston Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ulvm
Housing
Oppose
905. Mr M.J. Crawford (Individual) : 3 May 2011 12:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Sedgwick
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN175M RN18M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
To be read in conjunction with response from Stephens Associates, 4 May 2011, on behalf of residents of Sedgwick
Housing
Oppose
906. Mr and Mrs W. and Patricia Crawford (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
907. Mr and Mrs W. and Patricia Crawford (Individual) : 1 Jun 2011 09:58:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Housing
Oppose
908. Dr Roger Crawley (Individual) : 11 May 2011 15:04:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E31M E4M
909. Mr and Mrs D and M Crewdson (Individual) : 8 Jun 2011 10:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
910. Mr and Mrs Trevor and Sylvia Crewe (Individual) : 23 May 2011 10:22:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Headless Cross
911. Mr and Mrs M G and S Crisp (Individual) : 16 May 2011 11:47:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R121M
Housing
Oppose
912. Mr and Mrs Harry and Josie Croasdell (Individual) : 26 May 2011 13:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
913. Mr and Mrs Harry and Josie Croasdell (Individual) : 26 May 2011 13:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
914. Mrs Jane Crocker (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 12:10:00
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN156M
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
United Utilities quite clearly state this land is unsuitable for development. Their expertise should not be ignored.The road which would give access to this site is already very busy, with no pavement facility south,the junction and extra traffic would create additional danger for pedestrians, car users and wildlife.
915. Mrs Jane Crocker (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 14:10:00
Settlement
Cartmel
Map Number
33 Cartmel (with Headless Cross)
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R112
Housing
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Is there the demand for this scale of development which would substantially change Cartmel for the worse? Only 35% of this development can have local occupancy restrictions imposed(rather negating the arguement for providing local housing). There are currently 341 properties for sale on the Rightmove site at or under £100,000 within 10 miles of Cartmel.This scale of development would be totally out of character for Cartmel. Developing into greenbelt has a negative amenity value. Employment opportunities are limited in the village, many are linked to tourism. This scale of development risks a negative impact on tourism, hence reducing the number of jobs.
916. Mrs Janet Crockett (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 12:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M, R90M, E30, M26, M28, R234, RN3, M11M, R268, R270M, R274M, EN22, ON24, EN35M, R283M, EN22, R692ULVM, RN131M
917. Mr J C Crompton (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 14:12:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
918. Mr and Mrs Ronald and Marian Crook (Individual) : 24 Feb 2011 11:50:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Map Number
5 Arnside
Housing
Support in part
919. Mr Matthew Crosher (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 14:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
920. Mr and Mrs O and K Croskell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:07:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
921. Mr and Mrs O and K Croskell (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 10:08:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674K R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
922. Mrs M Cross (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R455
Housing
Oppose
923. Mrs M Cross (Individual) : 6 May 2011 10:17:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Heversham and Leasgill
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R48
Housing
Oppose
924. Mr Derek Cross (Individual) : 23 May 2011 16:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R90M
925. Mr and Mrs Colin and Jean Cross (Individual) : 26 May 2011 11:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM
926. Mr and Mrs Colin and Jean Cross (Individual) : 31 May 2011 15:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M
927. Mr /s A Cross (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 10:11:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R46 R674 R480 E65 RN169M
Housing
Oppose
928. Mr and Mrs Colin and Jean Cross (Individual) : 14 Jun 2011 11:38:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R689ULVM, R690ULV, RN184, R126M, R691ULV, R242, R697M
929. Ms Chloe Crossley (Individual) : 24 May 2011 08:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
SL1B R129M
Housing
Oppose
930. Mr and Mrs Allen and Jennifer Crossley (Individual) : 31 May 2011 14:56:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
931. Mr and Mrs Allen and Jennifer Crossley (Individual) : 31 May 2011 14:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
932. Mr and Mrs Mark and Clare Crossley (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:35:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
933. Mr and Mrs Mark and Clare Crossley (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:36:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
934. Mr Ian Croswell (Individual) : 3 Jun 2011 11:09:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R150M
Housing
Oppose
935. Mr Nigel Crowdy (Individual) : 14 Apr 2011 12:52:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (4 of 6) Kendal South West
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Employment
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
The site breaches the Council's own guidelines on developing outside natural boundaries, and I understand has been turned down for this reason in the past. Once the boundary at Scroggs is breached there is nothing to stop further development to Prizet and beyond. The proposed development will be in full view from both the Helm and the main approach roads to Kendal and the Lakes, effectively industrialising the Gateway to the Lake District. Whilst there is talk of significant structural landscaping being needed along the southern and eastern edges of the site, in sympathy with the landscape, this then mentions the views from the A6 and A591, which are to the West of the site. Any talk of shielding the site from view from the A591, particularly, is fanciful to say the very least because of the road's elevation above the site.
It would be a huge blow if the memorable entrance to Kendal for many of its visitors was lost forever for the financial benefit of a few, and perhaps merely to resite existing Kendal jobs.
936. Mr and Mrs J B Crowe (Individual) : 17 Mar 2011 11:40:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
MN25M
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Oppose
937. Ms Hayley Crowe (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Ulverston
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R242
938. Mr/s A Crowshaw (Individual) : 6 Jun 2011 15:16:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Arnside
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R88M
Housing
Oppose
939. Mr and Mrs James and Margaret Croxford (Individual) : 18 Apr 2011 13:57:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (1 of 6) Kendal Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN133M ON1 M2M
Housing
Oppose
940. Angela Cruickshank (Individual) : 24 Feb 2011 12:06:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34 R70
Housing
Oppose
941. Mr Kevin Cruickshank (Individual) : 3 Mar 2011 15:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34 R70
942. Mrs Angela Cruickshank (Individual) : 6 Mar 2011 18:42:00
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (2 of 4) Grange North
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
Community uses
Oppose
Open space
Oppose
Other (as specified above)
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
I am writing to inform you that I have just returned from walking my dog near to RN34 land today. I saw a family of deer grazing on this land and it was a beautiful experience and one I would very much like to enjoy in the years to come my wife is expecting our first child and I would very much like them to experience this too. I am discusted and shocked to hear that this land has been earmarked for a housing development just what is the council doing even thinking about this! You should be protecting areas like this not just for now but for the future too. Grange is getting to big and losing its small town feel already without even more houses particularly on beautiful green areas that are a haven for wildlife.
Think about any beautiful area or place you have been to and I bet it has been ruint by town planners trying to squeeze every penny out of it they can. Niagra Falls, the Pyramids, Tulum in Mexico (I have recently revisited) have been ruined beyond belief my man in the name of 'progress'. Every inch of land has been built on residential, commercial and for tourism - this is not progress at all it is called raping the land to the point that I would never ever want to revisit these places ever again! I am not saying for one minute this has happened to Grange but it is what could happen. A few hundred houses now a few hundred in another 10 years time so on and so on which is why the residents of Grange are outraged particularly on the subject of RN34. The reasons don't stack up if all of the housing was 'affordable' then at least there would be a glimmer of truth and justification but as I was told by a councillor this would not happen as there is not enough profit in this type of housing so there we are perhaps that is the crux more houses = more money, profit and greed for the privileged few I think it is discusting.
As for the rather smarmy Peter Thornton comments saying that is supply and demand because there will always be demand to live in lovely place like Grange you could fill 5000 homes easily and there would still be another 5000 wanting to live here and the south lakes in general its all about protecting this area from this outcome isn't that obvious and your job in the first place!
Grange roads are already getting busier and busier and I don't think the councils figures stack up whatsoever they are simply numbers plucked up to justify making money from building homes at any cost. I also don't buy the other thing I am told in that if you turn back the clock 40 years or so Grange is very different now to what it was then etc. The plain truth is that if you keep chipping away at it, moving boundaries to suit you (as in the case of RN34) then you will spoil it forever and for everyone. We are all tenants on this earth and what gives us the right to tarmac over the home of wildlife and beauty to grease a few palms. I very much hope that I do not have to to tell my unborn child just what RN34 used to be like or even worse refer to photos showing it in its former glory if the bulldozers move in and you fill it with tacky homes more likely than not that become second homes for the kind of people this council likes to rub shoulders with.
I hope you see sense and listen to the people who actually employ you and that you serve. One thing is for certain, the people of Grange are very angry about this and will go to any lengths to fight you every inch of the way regarding RN34.
Yours hopefully, a discusted resident.
943. Angela Cruickshank (Individual) : 29 Mar 2011 09:31:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
944. Mr Kevin Cruickshank (Individual) : 30 Mar 2011 11:00:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Map Number
30 (1 of 4) Grange Main Proposals
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
Housing
Oppose
945. Mr Kevin Cruickshank (Individual) : 2 Jun 2011 15:59:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Grange over Sands
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN34
946. Mr and Mrs Paul and Polly Cudby (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:27:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
947. Mr and Mrs Paul and Polly Cudby (Individual) : 31 May 2011 16:28:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R170M
948. Mr P Cummings (Individual) : 3 May 2011 10:10:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Burton in Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN226
949. Mrs Sarah Cummings (Individual) : 5 May 2011 14:25:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Kendal
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
E4M
Employment
Oppose
950. Mr David Cummings (Individual) : 19 May 2011 13:03:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Settlement
Natland
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
R679M
Housing
Oppose
951. Mrs Norma Cummins (Individual) : 24 Feb 2011 15:07:00
Settlement
Kendal
Map Number
1 (5 of 6) Kendal South East
Site reference number (e.g. R62) - If your comment is about a specific site you must indicate the correct site reference.
RN117M
If none of the above then please state here what your comment is about
Loss of Public Open Space and Greenfield Site
Housing
Oppose
Employment
Support
Retail
No view
Open space
Support
Other (as specified above)
No view
Please explain your reasons
I would like to oppose the proposed building of 71 dwellings within RN117M.
My concerns are noted below for reference:
1. Total loss of privacy as the area is on a sloping hillside and any new buildings would impact on my property. This would also raise concerns on the surplus water issues which are currently a problem in my garden.
2. The over head power lines would also be an issue for any new developments.
3. Access to the proposed site would be via any of the cul-de-sacs on the Valley Drive estate. This is a concern due to the narrow access within our cul-de-sacs and children play in these areas. Valley Drive is a very fast road due to vehicles using this as a method of bypassing the town centre.
4. With regards
