Response from Mr Peter Wilkinson (Individual)
1. Mr Peter Wilkinson (Individual) : 27 Apr 2011 15:32:00
Which document do you wish to comment on?
Interim Consultation Statement
Do you support, oppose or support in part this section of the document
Oppose
Please explain your reasons
Failure to Directly Consult Residents
The informal process adopted by SLDC has failed to directly consult residents adjacent to the proposed development areas, and in doing so has a flawed engagement process. Our first knowledge of the suggested site for housing R90M was received from another resident who had stumbled across the plans. Talking to other neighbours it is clear that the information has not been communicated effectively. It is insufficient to assume that residents will be informed through local press and passive web sites or parish councils, SLDC has a duty to directly consult residents who may be affected by these processes and this requires a proactive approach in identifying, contacting and consulting.
It is highly probable that the number of responses to this process would be significantly increased had SLDC fulfilled its obligations and directly consulted with residents adjacent to or living in close proximity to the proposals, leading to a more accurate reflection of community views and a realistic impact assessment.