Response from Mr Richard Simpson (Individual)
1. Mr Richard Simpson (Individual) : 10 Apr 2011 09:12:00
Which document do you wish to comment on?
Settlement Factfile: Heversham and Leasgill
Page
10, p26 and Appendix 3
Please explain your reasons
The nature of this form does not invite clear responses from the public, rather it invites responses within very narrow boundaries. Page 10 and page 26 make reference to the view to and from Humphrey Head when presumably the intention is Heversham Head. Appendix 3 indicates a shop and a secondary school in Heversham when neither exists.
It may be that these are typographical errors or they may represent slipshod work on behalf of the council which would be worrying in the context of this document. In either case the on-line forms available do not make it easy to draw this to your attention.
The choices to oppose, support or support in part a proposal fail to elict an individual's view. For example I oppose the proposal to build 99 house in Heversham but I do support the need to build some houses. If I indicate support in part, does that mean that I support in part the need for 99 houses or support the need for part of this proposal, ie to build houses but less than 99 in total? Your form has not helped me to fully express my views.
